Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Gustavo Rafael de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFLA
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/29294
Resumo: Dairy cattle has great importance in the Brazilian economy, since Brazil is the sixth largest milk producer in the world. However, a productivity/cow/day is still far below the other countries and, in search of highest productions, many farms have been invested in more intensive systems such as: compost barn and free stall. The objective of this research was to analyze, comparatively, a profitability of systems of milk production that use compost barn and free stall. Specifically, it is also intended to: a) Analyze and compare the representativeness of the groups of expenses that compose the total operational cost; b) Analyze and compare the representativeness of mastitis and reproduction expenses; c) Estimate and compare gross and net margins; d) Analyze and compare the representativeness of the items that compose the gross revenue; e) Help producers and technicians to choose the most adequate type of installation for each farm. The data was collected from January to December 2016 from four farms, chosen using non-probabilistic sampling by judgment, two of them use the compost barn and two, the free stall. The milk cost production were estimated according to the methodology of the operating cost, considering the cost center milk production, that involved lactating and dry cows. In addition, were estimated the gross and net margins as profitability indicators. The results were compared by means of descriptive analysis, using MS Excel, grouped in tables, with the purpose of improving the presentation, comparison and discussion. It was concluded that the gross and net margins were not influenced by the type of farm installation, and were positive in all analyzed production systems. Among the components of the effective operational cost, the representativeness of the item drugs was lower in the farms that use compost barn, while the cost with bed of cows was lower in the free stalls farms. Both the depreciation and total operational cost were similar among installation types. Regarding the revenues, milk sales had a higher percentage in free stall farms, despite the high standard deviation and the revenue expectations of manure were similar among the production systems. Thus, since there were no significant differences between types of facilities, it is understood that management facilities, productivity, reproductive performance, animal health (hoof problems and mastitis), environmental issues, besides of water and bed material (sand, sawdust, coffee straw) availability should be the motivators of choosing one over the other.
id UFLA_74657a5672388ba1a102826af48d1590
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/29294
network_acronym_str UFLA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository_id_str
spelling Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativoAnalysis of rentability of milk production systems in compost barn and free stall: a comparativeBovinocultura leiteiraInstalações animaisCompost barnFree stallProdução de leite - CustosDairy cattleAnimal facilityMilk production - CostsMedicina VeterináriaDairy cattle has great importance in the Brazilian economy, since Brazil is the sixth largest milk producer in the world. However, a productivity/cow/day is still far below the other countries and, in search of highest productions, many farms have been invested in more intensive systems such as: compost barn and free stall. The objective of this research was to analyze, comparatively, a profitability of systems of milk production that use compost barn and free stall. Specifically, it is also intended to: a) Analyze and compare the representativeness of the groups of expenses that compose the total operational cost; b) Analyze and compare the representativeness of mastitis and reproduction expenses; c) Estimate and compare gross and net margins; d) Analyze and compare the representativeness of the items that compose the gross revenue; e) Help producers and technicians to choose the most adequate type of installation for each farm. The data was collected from January to December 2016 from four farms, chosen using non-probabilistic sampling by judgment, two of them use the compost barn and two, the free stall. The milk cost production were estimated according to the methodology of the operating cost, considering the cost center milk production, that involved lactating and dry cows. In addition, were estimated the gross and net margins as profitability indicators. The results were compared by means of descriptive analysis, using MS Excel, grouped in tables, with the purpose of improving the presentation, comparison and discussion. It was concluded that the gross and net margins were not influenced by the type of farm installation, and were positive in all analyzed production systems. Among the components of the effective operational cost, the representativeness of the item drugs was lower in the farms that use compost barn, while the cost with bed of cows was lower in the free stalls farms. Both the depreciation and total operational cost were similar among installation types. Regarding the revenues, milk sales had a higher percentage in free stall farms, despite the high standard deviation and the revenue expectations of manure were similar among the production systems. Thus, since there were no significant differences between types of facilities, it is understood that management facilities, productivity, reproductive performance, animal health (hoof problems and mastitis), environmental issues, besides of water and bed material (sand, sawdust, coffee straw) availability should be the motivators of choosing one over the other.A bovinocultura leiteira possui grande importância na economia do Brasil, uma vez que o país é o sexto maior produtor de leite do mundo . Entretanto, a produtividade/vaca/dia ainda está muito abaixo de outros países e, pensando em melhorar esse indicador, muitas fazendas tem investido em sistemas mais intensivos como: compost barn e free stall. Objetivou-se, com esta pesquisa, analisar, comparativamente, a rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite que utilizam compost barn e free stall. Especificamente, pretendeu-se, ainda: a) Analisar e comparar a representatividade dos grupos de despesas que compõem o custo operacional total; b) Analisar e comparar a representatividade das despesas relativas à mastite e reprodução; c) Estimar e comparar as margens bruta e líquida ; d) Analisar e comparar a representatividade dos itens que compõem a receita bruta; e) Auxiliar produtores e técnicos a escolher o tipo de instalação mais adequada para cada fazenda. Foram analisados dados de janeiro a dezembro de 2016 de quatro fazendas, escolhidas utilizando-se amostragem não probabilística por julgamento, sendo duas que utilizam o compost barn e duas, o free stall. O custo de produção do leite foi estimado segundo a metodologia do custo operacional, considerando o centro de custos produção de leite, que envolveu as vacas em lactação e as secas. Adicionalmente, foram estimadas as margens bruta e a líquida, como indicadores de rentabilidade. Os resultados foram comparados por meios de análises descritivas, usando o aplicativo MS Excel, agrupados em tabelas, com objetivo de realizar uma melhor apresentação, comparação e discussão. Concluiu-se que as médias das margens bruta e líquida não foram influenciadas pelo tipo de instalação utilizada pela fazenda, sendo positivas em todos os sistemas de produção analisados. Dentre os componentes do custo operacional efetivo, a representatividade do item medicamentos foi menor nas propriedades com compost barn, enquanto o custo com cama para vacas foi menor nas fazendas de free stall. Tanto a depreciação, quanto o custo operacional total, foram semelhantes entre os tipos de instalação. Em relação às receitas, a venda de leite teve maior percentual nas fazendas de free stall, apesar do alto desvio padrão e as expectativas de receita de dejetos foram semelhantes entre os sistemas de produção . Dessa forma, visto que não houve diferenças expressivas entre os tipos de instalações, entende-se que as facilidades de manejo, produtividade, desempenho reprodutivo, saúde do s animais (lesões de casco e mastite), questões ambientais, além de disponibilidade de água e material de cama (areia, serragem, palha de café) devem ser os motivadores da escolha de uma em detrimento da outra.Universidade Federal de LavrasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências VeterináriasUFLAbrasilDepartamento de Medicina VeterináriaLopes, Marcos AurélioCosta, Geraldo Márcio daLima, André Luís RibeiroLopes, Marcos AurélioBarbari, MatteoCosta, Geraldo Márcio daDamasceno, Flávio AlvesSilva, Gustavo Rafael de Oliveira2018-05-22T12:46:35Z2018-05-22T12:46:35Z2018-05-212018-05-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfSILVA, G. R. de O. Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo. 2018. 57 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias)-Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2018.http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/29294porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLAinstname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLA2018-05-22T12:46:36Zoai:localhost:1/29294Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufla.br/oai/requestnivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.bropendoar:2018-05-22T12:46:36Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo
Analysis of rentability of milk production systems in compost barn and free stall: a comparative
title Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo
spellingShingle Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo
Silva, Gustavo Rafael de Oliveira
Bovinocultura leiteira
Instalações animais
Compost barn
Free stall
Produção de leite - Custos
Dairy cattle
Animal facility
Milk production - Costs
Medicina Veterinária
title_short Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo
title_full Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo
title_fullStr Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo
title_full_unstemmed Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo
title_sort Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo
author Silva, Gustavo Rafael de Oliveira
author_facet Silva, Gustavo Rafael de Oliveira
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Lopes, Marcos Aurélio
Costa, Geraldo Márcio da
Lima, André Luís Ribeiro
Lopes, Marcos Aurélio
Barbari, Matteo
Costa, Geraldo Márcio da
Damasceno, Flávio Alves
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Gustavo Rafael de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bovinocultura leiteira
Instalações animais
Compost barn
Free stall
Produção de leite - Custos
Dairy cattle
Animal facility
Milk production - Costs
Medicina Veterinária
topic Bovinocultura leiteira
Instalações animais
Compost barn
Free stall
Produção de leite - Custos
Dairy cattle
Animal facility
Milk production - Costs
Medicina Veterinária
description Dairy cattle has great importance in the Brazilian economy, since Brazil is the sixth largest milk producer in the world. However, a productivity/cow/day is still far below the other countries and, in search of highest productions, many farms have been invested in more intensive systems such as: compost barn and free stall. The objective of this research was to analyze, comparatively, a profitability of systems of milk production that use compost barn and free stall. Specifically, it is also intended to: a) Analyze and compare the representativeness of the groups of expenses that compose the total operational cost; b) Analyze and compare the representativeness of mastitis and reproduction expenses; c) Estimate and compare gross and net margins; d) Analyze and compare the representativeness of the items that compose the gross revenue; e) Help producers and technicians to choose the most adequate type of installation for each farm. The data was collected from January to December 2016 from four farms, chosen using non-probabilistic sampling by judgment, two of them use the compost barn and two, the free stall. The milk cost production were estimated according to the methodology of the operating cost, considering the cost center milk production, that involved lactating and dry cows. In addition, were estimated the gross and net margins as profitability indicators. The results were compared by means of descriptive analysis, using MS Excel, grouped in tables, with the purpose of improving the presentation, comparison and discussion. It was concluded that the gross and net margins were not influenced by the type of farm installation, and were positive in all analyzed production systems. Among the components of the effective operational cost, the representativeness of the item drugs was lower in the farms that use compost barn, while the cost with bed of cows was lower in the free stalls farms. Both the depreciation and total operational cost were similar among installation types. Regarding the revenues, milk sales had a higher percentage in free stall farms, despite the high standard deviation and the revenue expectations of manure were similar among the production systems. Thus, since there were no significant differences between types of facilities, it is understood that management facilities, productivity, reproductive performance, animal health (hoof problems and mastitis), environmental issues, besides of water and bed material (sand, sawdust, coffee straw) availability should be the motivators of choosing one over the other.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-05-22T12:46:35Z
2018-05-22T12:46:35Z
2018-05-21
2018-05-04
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv SILVA, G. R. de O. Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo. 2018. 57 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias)-Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2018.
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/29294
identifier_str_mv SILVA, G. R. de O. Análise de rentabilidade de sistemas de produção de leite em compost barn e free stall: um comparativo. 2018. 57 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Veterinárias)-Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2018.
url http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/29294
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Lavras
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias
UFLA
brasil
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Lavras
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias
UFLA
brasil
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLA
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
collection Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.br
_version_ 1784550015527550976