Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Ítalo Braz Gonçalves de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFLA
Texto Completo: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55861
Resumo: Integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS) is a management practice that uses the same land area to produce one crop, followed by livestock production, and usually followed by similar crops or not. This system aims to take advantage of the direct and indirect benefits brought by each component to the other in a complementary mutualistic relationship. The main objective of producing a corn crop is to harvest grain (for human or animal food) or to produce silage (exclusively for animal feed). Silage is a process of food conservation through anaerobic fermentation, and there are several types of silage. The choice of the most appropriate type of silage can vary with the objective of the farm, the location, and the time of the year. Snaplage is silage produced using only the corn ear (cob, husk, and grains). However, this process leaves a large quantity of residue consisting of leaf and stem behind, which remains in the area as a ground cover. A different strategy for using this residue would be grazing by animals. However, there are still concerns among producers and researchers if animal grazing would affect the soil positively or negatively, and consequently, the subsequent crop yield. Another question to be evaluated is whether an increase in stocking rate could compromise the performance of the animals. The experimental area was divided into paddocks with high stocking rates (more animals per unit of area), low stocking rates (fewer animals per unit of area), and ungrazed paddocks (no animals). This research demonstrated that the amount of residue decreased over time in all the paddocks, especially the more digestible material such as leaf and sheath. When planting the next crop, the grazed paddocks had less residue than the ungrazed ones. The disappearance is a result of grazing and trampling by the animals and weathering. Grazing by the animals did not compact the soil, one of the indicators of physical characteristics, at either of the stocking rates evaluated. Grazing by animals increased the amount of soil nutrients, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. In both stocking rates, the animals consumed similar amount of residue and feed daily and consequently had similar performance. However, at the higher stocking rate, production per unit of area was double compared to the lower stocking rate. The subsequent crop yield increased when the paddocks were grazed compared to ungrazed ones. Thus, we concluded that it is possible to use the residue for animal finishing in an ICLS, adding cattle production between two crop rotations without affecting the soil’s physical characteristics and the animal’s performance. Putting more animals in the area allows for doubling the productivity per unit area, and adding animals positively affects the subsequent crop yield.
id UFLA_b34fb2ce23bab014705198af9f6784e1
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/55861
network_acronym_str UFLA
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository_id_str
spelling Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yieldPastejo do residuo de snaplage como uma fonte de forragem para terminação do gado de corte: efeitos sobre a produção animal, propriedades do solo e rendimento da lavoura subsequenteBeef cattleIntegrated crop-livestock systemSnaplage residueCorn productionBovinos de corteIntegração lavoura-pecuáriaResíduos de snaplageMilho - ProduçãoPastagem e ForragiculturaIntegrated crop-livestock system (ICLS) is a management practice that uses the same land area to produce one crop, followed by livestock production, and usually followed by similar crops or not. This system aims to take advantage of the direct and indirect benefits brought by each component to the other in a complementary mutualistic relationship. The main objective of producing a corn crop is to harvest grain (for human or animal food) or to produce silage (exclusively for animal feed). Silage is a process of food conservation through anaerobic fermentation, and there are several types of silage. The choice of the most appropriate type of silage can vary with the objective of the farm, the location, and the time of the year. Snaplage is silage produced using only the corn ear (cob, husk, and grains). However, this process leaves a large quantity of residue consisting of leaf and stem behind, which remains in the area as a ground cover. A different strategy for using this residue would be grazing by animals. However, there are still concerns among producers and researchers if animal grazing would affect the soil positively or negatively, and consequently, the subsequent crop yield. Another question to be evaluated is whether an increase in stocking rate could compromise the performance of the animals. The experimental area was divided into paddocks with high stocking rates (more animals per unit of area), low stocking rates (fewer animals per unit of area), and ungrazed paddocks (no animals). This research demonstrated that the amount of residue decreased over time in all the paddocks, especially the more digestible material such as leaf and sheath. When planting the next crop, the grazed paddocks had less residue than the ungrazed ones. The disappearance is a result of grazing and trampling by the animals and weathering. Grazing by the animals did not compact the soil, one of the indicators of physical characteristics, at either of the stocking rates evaluated. Grazing by animals increased the amount of soil nutrients, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. In both stocking rates, the animals consumed similar amount of residue and feed daily and consequently had similar performance. However, at the higher stocking rate, production per unit of area was double compared to the lower stocking rate. The subsequent crop yield increased when the paddocks were grazed compared to ungrazed ones. Thus, we concluded that it is possible to use the residue for animal finishing in an ICLS, adding cattle production between two crop rotations without affecting the soil’s physical characteristics and the animal’s performance. Putting more animals in the area allows for doubling the productivity per unit area, and adding animals positively affects the subsequent crop yield.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)O sistema de integração lavoura pecuária (ILPs) permite uma maior rentabilidade com uso eficiente da terra. Com o uso crescente do snaplage no Brasil, o pastejo por animais dos abundantes resíduos pós-colheita pode ser uma excelente opção para uso em um ILPs. Este estudo avalia os efeitos do pastoreio sobre as características dos resíduos, características do solo, desempenho e comportamento dos animais, e o subsequente rendimento da cultura no ILPs. Imediatamente após a colheita do milho, a área foi dividida em vinte e quatro piquetes, e os tratamentos foram atribuídos aleatoriamente. Os tratamentos foram duas taxas de lotação (SR): 1) Baixa Taxa de Lotação (LS; 3,5 UA/ha), e 2) Alta Taxa de Lotação (HS; 7,0 UA/ha) e Controle (CT). Os tratamentos foram obtidos através da modificação do tamanho dos piquetes. As novilhas cruzadas (n = 48, peso inicial do corpo = 275 ± 23 kg) foram distribuídas aleatoriamente em 16 paddocks (3 por piquete). Os dados foram analisados utilizando o procedimento PROC MIXED da SAS. As medias foram estimados usando LSMEANS e comparados usando o teste Tukey. Para as características físicas e químicas do solo e a produção da lavoura subsequente, os contrastes pré-planejados foram CT versus HS+LS e HS versus LS com significância de P ≤ 0,05. A análise multivariada foi realizada utilizando o método de análise de componentes principais. A massa de resíduo inicial foi semelhante para todos os tratamentos (9.600 kg DM/ha). Havia menos massa de resíduo final para HS (P < 0,01) do que para CT. Não houve efeito de SR x tempo (P = 0,88) sobre a massa total. Havia menos massa total para HS (P < 0,01) do que para LS e a massa total diminuiu ao longo do tempo (P < 0,01). Havia menos massa total pré-plantio para HS e LS (P < 0,01) do que para CT. Nenhum efeito de pastejo ou SR (P ≥ 0,22) foi detectado para resistência à penetração. O balanço de nitrogênio aumentou com o pastejo (82% comparado ao não pastejado; P < 0,01). Os macronutrientes fósforo (P) e potássio (K) também foram aumentados pelo pastejo (28 e 42%, respectivamente). Houve um efeito de tempo (P < 0,01) para o pastoreio, ociosidade e visita ao cocho. Não houve diferença entre HS e LS para consumo de resíduos (P = 0,34; 0,434 vs. 0,478 kg/dia, respectivamente), consumo de concentrado (P = 0,84; 7,72 vs. 7,78 kg/dia, respectivamente), e ganho médio diário (GMD; P = 0,94; 0,952 vs. 0,956 kg/dia, respectivamente), O tratamento HS aumentou (P < 0,01) ganho por área (618 vs. 309 kg/ha) em comparação com o LS. O pastejo aumentou o produção da lavoura subsequente (15% em comparação com o não pastoreado; P ≤ 0,04). Em conclusão, o pastejo de resíduo permitiu a adição uma produção animal entre duas lavouras de milho e não afetou o desempenho das novilhas em terminação. Entretanto, a maior taxa de lotação aumentou o ganho por área de terra. O pastejo do resíduo afetou positivamente o rendimento da safra de milho subsequente.Universidade Federal de LavrasPrograma de Pós-graduação em ZootecniaUFLAbrasilDepartamento de ZootecniaCasagrande, Daniel RumeBernardes, Thiago FernandesGionbelli, Mateus PiesLadeira, Márcio MachadoShike, Daniel WilliamLima, Ítalo Braz Gonçalves de2023-01-24T16:10:51Z2023-01-24T16:10:51Z2023-01-242022-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfLIMA, I. B. G. de. Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield. 2022. 97 p. Tese (Doutorado em Zootecnia)–Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2022.http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55861enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLAinstname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)instacron:UFLA2023-01-24T16:10:51Zoai:localhost:1/55861Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufla.br/oai/requestnivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.bropendoar:2023-01-24T16:10:51Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield
Pastejo do residuo de snaplage como uma fonte de forragem para terminação do gado de corte: efeitos sobre a produção animal, propriedades do solo e rendimento da lavoura subsequente
title Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield
spellingShingle Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield
Lima, Ítalo Braz Gonçalves de
Beef cattle
Integrated crop-livestock system
Snaplage residue
Corn production
Bovinos de corte
Integração lavoura-pecuária
Resíduos de snaplage
Milho - Produção
Pastagem e Forragicultura
title_short Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield
title_full Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield
title_fullStr Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield
title_full_unstemmed Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield
title_sort Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield
author Lima, Ítalo Braz Gonçalves de
author_facet Lima, Ítalo Braz Gonçalves de
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Casagrande, Daniel Rume
Bernardes, Thiago Fernandes
Gionbelli, Mateus Pies
Ladeira, Márcio Machado
Shike, Daniel William
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Ítalo Braz Gonçalves de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Beef cattle
Integrated crop-livestock system
Snaplage residue
Corn production
Bovinos de corte
Integração lavoura-pecuária
Resíduos de snaplage
Milho - Produção
Pastagem e Forragicultura
topic Beef cattle
Integrated crop-livestock system
Snaplage residue
Corn production
Bovinos de corte
Integração lavoura-pecuária
Resíduos de snaplage
Milho - Produção
Pastagem e Forragicultura
description Integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS) is a management practice that uses the same land area to produce one crop, followed by livestock production, and usually followed by similar crops or not. This system aims to take advantage of the direct and indirect benefits brought by each component to the other in a complementary mutualistic relationship. The main objective of producing a corn crop is to harvest grain (for human or animal food) or to produce silage (exclusively for animal feed). Silage is a process of food conservation through anaerobic fermentation, and there are several types of silage. The choice of the most appropriate type of silage can vary with the objective of the farm, the location, and the time of the year. Snaplage is silage produced using only the corn ear (cob, husk, and grains). However, this process leaves a large quantity of residue consisting of leaf and stem behind, which remains in the area as a ground cover. A different strategy for using this residue would be grazing by animals. However, there are still concerns among producers and researchers if animal grazing would affect the soil positively or negatively, and consequently, the subsequent crop yield. Another question to be evaluated is whether an increase in stocking rate could compromise the performance of the animals. The experimental area was divided into paddocks with high stocking rates (more animals per unit of area), low stocking rates (fewer animals per unit of area), and ungrazed paddocks (no animals). This research demonstrated that the amount of residue decreased over time in all the paddocks, especially the more digestible material such as leaf and sheath. When planting the next crop, the grazed paddocks had less residue than the ungrazed ones. The disappearance is a result of grazing and trampling by the animals and weathering. Grazing by the animals did not compact the soil, one of the indicators of physical characteristics, at either of the stocking rates evaluated. Grazing by animals increased the amount of soil nutrients, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. In both stocking rates, the animals consumed similar amount of residue and feed daily and consequently had similar performance. However, at the higher stocking rate, production per unit of area was double compared to the lower stocking rate. The subsequent crop yield increased when the paddocks were grazed compared to ungrazed ones. Thus, we concluded that it is possible to use the residue for animal finishing in an ICLS, adding cattle production between two crop rotations without affecting the soil’s physical characteristics and the animal’s performance. Putting more animals in the area allows for doubling the productivity per unit area, and adding animals positively affects the subsequent crop yield.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-26
2023-01-24T16:10:51Z
2023-01-24T16:10:51Z
2023-01-24
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv LIMA, I. B. G. de. Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield. 2022. 97 p. Tese (Doutorado em Zootecnia)–Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2022.
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55861
identifier_str_mv LIMA, I. B. G. de. Grazing snaplage residue as a roughage source for finishing beef cattle: effects on beef production, soil property, and subsequent crop yield. 2022. 97 p. Tese (Doutorado em Zootecnia)–Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2022.
url http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55861
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Lavras
Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia
UFLA
brasil
Departamento de Zootecnia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Lavras
Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia
UFLA
brasil
Departamento de Zootecnia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFLA
instname:Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron:UFLA
instname_str Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
instacron_str UFLA
institution UFLA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFLA
collection Repositório Institucional da UFLA
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFLA - Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nivaldo@ufla.br || repositorio.biblioteca@ufla.br
_version_ 1815439263310807040