ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maunu, Ari
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Kriterion (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/25650
Resumo: The purpose of this paper is to bring out, by means of a simple thought experiment involving demonstratives, a discrepancy between what is expressed and what is believed (which contradicts the Theory of Direct Reference), and to consider some consequences of this – most notably, whether we might hold, for example, that the ancients never believed that Hesperus is not Phosphorus.
id UFMG-10_49a2d631d2064c6492a46fe2955ca086
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/25650
network_acronym_str UFMG-10
network_name_str Kriterion (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?Necessary identityBeliefsIndexicalsProper namesDirect Reference TheoryThe purpose of this paper is to bring out, by means of a simple thought experiment involving demonstratives, a discrepancy between what is expressed and what is believed (which contradicts the Theory of Direct Reference), and to consider some consequences of this – most notably, whether we might hold, for example, that the ancients never believed that Hesperus is not Phosphorus.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2020-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/25650Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 No. 145 (2020)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 Núm. 145 (2020)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 61 No 145 (2020)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 61 N. 145 (2020)Revista Kriterion; v. 61 n. 145 (2020)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/25650/20005Copyright (c) 2020 Kriterion: Revista de Filosofiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaunu, Ari2020-10-02T19:43:56Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/25650Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:25.228284Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?
title ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?
spellingShingle ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?
Maunu, Ari
Necessary identity
Beliefs
Indexicals
Proper names
Direct Reference Theory
title_short ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?
title_full ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?
title_fullStr ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?
title_full_unstemmed ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?
title_sort ARE NECESSARY IDENTITIES EVER DISBELIEVED?
author Maunu, Ari
author_facet Maunu, Ari
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maunu, Ari
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Necessary identity
Beliefs
Indexicals
Proper names
Direct Reference Theory
topic Necessary identity
Beliefs
Indexicals
Proper names
Direct Reference Theory
description The purpose of this paper is to bring out, by means of a simple thought experiment involving demonstratives, a discrepancy between what is expressed and what is believed (which contradicts the Theory of Direct Reference), and to consider some consequences of this – most notably, whether we might hold, for example, that the ancients never believed that Hesperus is not Phosphorus.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/25650
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/25650
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/25650/20005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 No. 145 (2020)
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 61 Núm. 145 (2020)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 61 No 145 (2020)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 61 N. 145 (2020)
Revista Kriterion; v. 61 n. 145 (2020)
1981-5336
0100-512X
reponame:Kriterion (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Kriterion (Online)
collection Kriterion (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakriterion@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711183009218560

Registros relacionados