A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Kriterion (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551
Resumo: In Eric Weil’s Logic of Philosophy, the work appears asa rupture with the absolute, an attitude of pure violence, whose opposition is realized by acting, therefore, it is mute. And yet, this attitude has a language. This paper seeks to understand how this contradiction is possible, characterizing the language that the work makes use of. To this end, we have divided this paper into three sections. In the first section, we present the distinction between language and discourse as understood by Weil. Thus arises the resource through which the loan of a discourse to violence is understood, which allows access to its language. In the second section we propose a division of the language of the work into three levels: phenomenon, formality and form. In this section we also discuss an example of the formality with the condition category. In the last section, we propose six features that constitute the third level of the language of the work: myth, metaphor, feeling, usefulness, proposition and imperative. The paper concludes with a review of the aspects worked in the light of the lie and with the proposal of an imperative that is opposed to the imperative of the work, therefore, to its language.
id UFMG-10_72ef626e52403e1515738b25e6ddfc63
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/40551
network_acronym_str UFMG-10
network_name_str Kriterion (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORYUM ESTUDO SOBRE A LINGUAGEM DA CATEGORIA DA OBRAObra.LinguagemViolênciaEric WeilWorkLanguageViolenceEric WeilIn Eric Weil’s Logic of Philosophy, the work appears asa rupture with the absolute, an attitude of pure violence, whose opposition is realized by acting, therefore, it is mute. And yet, this attitude has a language. This paper seeks to understand how this contradiction is possible, characterizing the language that the work makes use of. To this end, we have divided this paper into three sections. In the first section, we present the distinction between language and discourse as understood by Weil. Thus arises the resource through which the loan of a discourse to violence is understood, which allows access to its language. In the second section we propose a division of the language of the work into three levels: phenomenon, formality and form. In this section we also discuss an example of the formality with the condition category. In the last section, we propose six features that constitute the third level of the language of the work: myth, metaphor, feeling, usefulness, proposition and imperative. The paper concludes with a review of the aspects worked in the light of the lie and with the proposal of an imperative that is opposed to the imperative of the work, therefore, to its language.Na Lógica da filosofia de Eric Weil, a obra aparece como ruptura com o absoluto, atitude da violência pura, cuja oposição se realiza pelo agir, portanto, é muda. E mesmo assim, essa atitude possui uma linguagem. Nosso objetivo é compreender como essa contradição é possível, caracterizando a linguagem da qual a obra faz uso. Para tanto, propomos uma pesquisa dividida em três seções. Na primeira, apresentamos a distinção entre linguagem e discurso conforme entendido por Weil. Assim surge o recurso por meio do qual se entende o empréstimo de um discurso à violência, o que permite acessar sua linguagem.Na segunda seção propomos uma divisão da linguagem da obra em três níveis: do fenômeno, da formalidade e da forma. Nessa seção também discutimos um exemplo da formalidade com a categoria da condição. Na terceira seção, propomos seis traços que constituem o terceiro nível da linguagem da obra: mito, metáfora, sentimento, serventia, proposição e imperativo. Finalizamos com uma revisão dos aspectos trabalhados à luz da mentira e com a proposta de um imperativo que se opõe ao imperativo da obra, portanto, à sua linguagem.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2023-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551/38774Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Daniel2023-10-02T23:32:10Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/40551Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:31.717739Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY
UM ESTUDO SOBRE A LINGUAGEM DA CATEGORIA DA OBRA
title A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY
spellingShingle A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY
Soares, Daniel
Obra.
Linguagem
Violência
Eric Weil
Work
Language
Violence
Eric Weil
title_short A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY
title_full A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY
title_fullStr A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY
title_full_unstemmed A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY
title_sort A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY
author Soares, Daniel
author_facet Soares, Daniel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Obra.
Linguagem
Violência
Eric Weil
Work
Language
Violence
Eric Weil
topic Obra.
Linguagem
Violência
Eric Weil
Work
Language
Violence
Eric Weil
description In Eric Weil’s Logic of Philosophy, the work appears asa rupture with the absolute, an attitude of pure violence, whose opposition is realized by acting, therefore, it is mute. And yet, this attitude has a language. This paper seeks to understand how this contradiction is possible, characterizing the language that the work makes use of. To this end, we have divided this paper into three sections. In the first section, we present the distinction between language and discourse as understood by Weil. Thus arises the resource through which the loan of a discourse to violence is understood, which allows access to its language. In the second section we propose a division of the language of the work into three levels: phenomenon, formality and form. In this section we also discuss an example of the formality with the condition category. In the last section, we propose six features that constitute the third level of the language of the work: myth, metaphor, feeling, usefulness, proposition and imperative. The paper concludes with a review of the aspects worked in the light of the lie and with the proposal of an imperative that is opposed to the imperative of the work, therefore, to its language.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551/38774
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion
Revista Kriterion
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia
Revista Kriterion
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023)
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023)
Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023)
1981-5336
0100-512X
reponame:Kriterion (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Kriterion (Online)
collection Kriterion (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakriterion@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711183437037568