A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Kriterion (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551 |
Resumo: | In Eric Weil’s Logic of Philosophy, the work appears asa rupture with the absolute, an attitude of pure violence, whose opposition is realized by acting, therefore, it is mute. And yet, this attitude has a language. This paper seeks to understand how this contradiction is possible, characterizing the language that the work makes use of. To this end, we have divided this paper into three sections. In the first section, we present the distinction between language and discourse as understood by Weil. Thus arises the resource through which the loan of a discourse to violence is understood, which allows access to its language. In the second section we propose a division of the language of the work into three levels: phenomenon, formality and form. In this section we also discuss an example of the formality with the condition category. In the last section, we propose six features that constitute the third level of the language of the work: myth, metaphor, feeling, usefulness, proposition and imperative. The paper concludes with a review of the aspects worked in the light of the lie and with the proposal of an imperative that is opposed to the imperative of the work, therefore, to its language. |
id |
UFMG-10_72ef626e52403e1515738b25e6ddfc63 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/40551 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-10 |
network_name_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORYUM ESTUDO SOBRE A LINGUAGEM DA CATEGORIA DA OBRAObra.LinguagemViolênciaEric WeilWorkLanguageViolenceEric WeilIn Eric Weil’s Logic of Philosophy, the work appears asa rupture with the absolute, an attitude of pure violence, whose opposition is realized by acting, therefore, it is mute. And yet, this attitude has a language. This paper seeks to understand how this contradiction is possible, characterizing the language that the work makes use of. To this end, we have divided this paper into three sections. In the first section, we present the distinction between language and discourse as understood by Weil. Thus arises the resource through which the loan of a discourse to violence is understood, which allows access to its language. In the second section we propose a division of the language of the work into three levels: phenomenon, formality and form. In this section we also discuss an example of the formality with the condition category. In the last section, we propose six features that constitute the third level of the language of the work: myth, metaphor, feeling, usefulness, proposition and imperative. The paper concludes with a review of the aspects worked in the light of the lie and with the proposal of an imperative that is opposed to the imperative of the work, therefore, to its language.Na Lógica da filosofia de Eric Weil, a obra aparece como ruptura com o absoluto, atitude da violência pura, cuja oposição se realiza pelo agir, portanto, é muda. E mesmo assim, essa atitude possui uma linguagem. Nosso objetivo é compreender como essa contradição é possível, caracterizando a linguagem da qual a obra faz uso. Para tanto, propomos uma pesquisa dividida em três seções. Na primeira, apresentamos a distinção entre linguagem e discurso conforme entendido por Weil. Assim surge o recurso por meio do qual se entende o empréstimo de um discurso à violência, o que permite acessar sua linguagem.Na segunda seção propomos uma divisão da linguagem da obra em três níveis: do fenômeno, da formalidade e da forma. Nessa seção também discutimos um exemplo da formalidade com a categoria da condição. Na terceira seção, propomos seis traços que constituem o terceiro nível da linguagem da obra: mito, metáfora, sentimento, serventia, proposição e imperativo. Finalizamos com uma revisão dos aspectos trabalhados à luz da mentira e com a proposta de um imperativo que se opõe ao imperativo da obra, portanto, à sua linguagem.Revista KriterionRevista KriterionKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaKriterion: Revista de FilosofiaRevista Kriterion2023-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023)Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023)Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023)1981-53360100-512Xreponame:Kriterion (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551/38774Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterionhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Daniel2023-10-02T23:32:10Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/40551Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterionPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/oairevistakriterion@gmail.com1981-53360100-512Xopendoar:2024-01-24T12:41:31.717739Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY UM ESTUDO SOBRE A LINGUAGEM DA CATEGORIA DA OBRA |
title |
A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY |
spellingShingle |
A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY Soares, Daniel Obra. Linguagem Violência Eric Weil Work Language Violence Eric Weil |
title_short |
A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY |
title_full |
A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY |
title_fullStr |
A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY |
title_full_unstemmed |
A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY |
title_sort |
A STUDY ON THE LANGUAGE OF THE WORK CATEGORY |
author |
Soares, Daniel |
author_facet |
Soares, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Obra. Linguagem Violência Eric Weil Work Language Violence Eric Weil |
topic |
Obra. Linguagem Violência Eric Weil Work Language Violence Eric Weil |
description |
In Eric Weil’s Logic of Philosophy, the work appears asa rupture with the absolute, an attitude of pure violence, whose opposition is realized by acting, therefore, it is mute. And yet, this attitude has a language. This paper seeks to understand how this contradiction is possible, characterizing the language that the work makes use of. To this end, we have divided this paper into three sections. In the first section, we present the distinction between language and discourse as understood by Weil. Thus arises the resource through which the loan of a discourse to violence is understood, which allows access to its language. In the second section we propose a division of the language of the work into three levels: phenomenon, formality and form. In this section we also discuss an example of the formality with the condition category. In the last section, we propose six features that constitute the third level of the language of the work: myth, metaphor, feeling, usefulness, proposition and imperative. The paper concludes with a review of the aspects worked in the light of the lie and with the proposal of an imperative that is opposed to the imperative of the work, therefore, to its language. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/kriterion/article/view/40551/38774 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Kriterion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion Revista Kriterion Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia Revista Kriterion |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 No. 155 (2023) Revista Kriterion; Vol. 64 Núm. 155 (2023) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 64 No 155 (2023) Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia; V. 64 N. 155 (2023) Revista Kriterion; v. 64 n. 155 (2023) 1981-5336 0100-512X reponame:Kriterion (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Kriterion (Online) |
collection |
Kriterion (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Kriterion (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakriterion@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799711183437037568 |