Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2130 |
Resumo: | Evaluating the performance of dentistry students is essential to motivate learning. This article presents a review of the literature on the main clinical performance evaluation methods available. Based on that review, this work develops a method of clinical evaluation to be applied in the Faculty of Dentistry - UFMG. The Clinical Assessment Protocol (CAP) was developed considering OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) and SCOT (Structured Clinical Operative Test) methodologies. CAP’s purpose is to objectively assess students’ learning on topics related to medical history investigation, diagnosis, treatment planning, infection control, techniques, skills, communication and professionalism. Students’ self-assessment is also part of this protocol and may be interesting to identify their own weaknesses and strengths, motivating their learning process. CAP can be an alternative to conventional evaluation methods, reducing subjectivity and providing more reliability and equity to the evaluation process. |
id |
UFMG-24_cbd03b6d8d4cc89d18308eebdc215d5c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/2130 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-24 |
network_name_str |
Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performanceEstratégias para avaliação do desempenho clínico de estudantes de OdontologiaAvaliação educacionalEducação em OdontologiaAutoavaliaçãoEstudantesCompetência clínicaEducational assessmentDentistry educationSelf-assessmentStudentsClinical competenceEvaluating the performance of dentistry students is essential to motivate learning. This article presents a review of the literature on the main clinical performance evaluation methods available. Based on that review, this work develops a method of clinical evaluation to be applied in the Faculty of Dentistry - UFMG. The Clinical Assessment Protocol (CAP) was developed considering OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) and SCOT (Structured Clinical Operative Test) methodologies. CAP’s purpose is to objectively assess students’ learning on topics related to medical history investigation, diagnosis, treatment planning, infection control, techniques, skills, communication and professionalism. Students’ self-assessment is also part of this protocol and may be interesting to identify their own weaknesses and strengths, motivating their learning process. CAP can be an alternative to conventional evaluation methods, reducing subjectivity and providing more reliability and equity to the evaluation process.A avaliação do desempenho clínico de estudantes de Odontologia é muito importante para motivar o aprendizado. Este artigo propõe-se a apresentar uma revisão de literatura sobre métodos de avaliação de desempenho clínico e a desenvolver um protocolo para ser aplicado nas disciplinas do curso de Odontologia da UFMG. O Protocolo de Avaliação Clínica (PAC) foi elaborado a partir do Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) e do Structured Clinical Operative Test (SCOT), métodos de avaliação mais encontrados na literatura, com a finalidade de realizar uma avaliação objetiva do aprendizado do aluno em pontos relacionados a anamnese, diagnóstico, plano de tratamento, controle de infecção, técnicas, habilidade, comunicação e profissionalismo. A autoavaliação realizada pelos alunos também faz parte desse protocolo, sendo interessante para se diagnosticarem pontos fracos e virtudes dos estudantes. O PAC pode ser uma alternativa aos métodos convencionais de avaliação, reduzindo a subjetividade e tornando o processo avaliativo mais confiável e homogêneo.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2016-10-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/213010.35699/2237-5864.2016.2130Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2016); 223-246Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2016); 223-246Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; v. 6 n. 2 (2016); 223-2462237-58642358-6338reponame:Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2130/1394Copyright (c) 2016 Rogéli Tibúrcio Ribeiro da Cunha Peixoto, Patrícia Valente Araujo, Allyson Nogueira Moreira, Cláudia Silami Magalhãesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, Patricia Valente Araújo JacquesPretti, HenriqueTeixeira, Karina I. R.Magalhães, Cláudia S.Moreira, Allyson NogueiraPeixoto, Rogéli T. R. C.2020-05-19T18:07:26Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/2130Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/oairevistadocenciaensinosuperior@ufmg.br||2237-58642237-5864opendoar:2020-05-19T18:07:26Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performance Estratégias para avaliação do desempenho clínico de estudantes de Odontologia |
title |
Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performance |
spellingShingle |
Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performance Gonçalves, Patricia Valente Araújo Jacques Avaliação educacional Educação em Odontologia Autoavaliação Estudantes Competência clínica Educational assessment Dentistry education Self-assessment Students Clinical competence |
title_short |
Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performance |
title_full |
Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performance |
title_fullStr |
Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performance |
title_sort |
Strategies for evaluating Dentistry students’ clinical performance |
author |
Gonçalves, Patricia Valente Araújo Jacques |
author_facet |
Gonçalves, Patricia Valente Araújo Jacques Pretti, Henrique Teixeira, Karina I. R. Magalhães, Cláudia S. Moreira, Allyson Nogueira Peixoto, Rogéli T. R. C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pretti, Henrique Teixeira, Karina I. R. Magalhães, Cláudia S. Moreira, Allyson Nogueira Peixoto, Rogéli T. R. C. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves, Patricia Valente Araújo Jacques Pretti, Henrique Teixeira, Karina I. R. Magalhães, Cláudia S. Moreira, Allyson Nogueira Peixoto, Rogéli T. R. C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação educacional Educação em Odontologia Autoavaliação Estudantes Competência clínica Educational assessment Dentistry education Self-assessment Students Clinical competence |
topic |
Avaliação educacional Educação em Odontologia Autoavaliação Estudantes Competência clínica Educational assessment Dentistry education Self-assessment Students Clinical competence |
description |
Evaluating the performance of dentistry students is essential to motivate learning. This article presents a review of the literature on the main clinical performance evaluation methods available. Based on that review, this work develops a method of clinical evaluation to be applied in the Faculty of Dentistry - UFMG. The Clinical Assessment Protocol (CAP) was developed considering OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) and SCOT (Structured Clinical Operative Test) methodologies. CAP’s purpose is to objectively assess students’ learning on topics related to medical history investigation, diagnosis, treatment planning, infection control, techniques, skills, communication and professionalism. Students’ self-assessment is also part of this protocol and may be interesting to identify their own weaknesses and strengths, motivating their learning process. CAP can be an alternative to conventional evaluation methods, reducing subjectivity and providing more reliability and equity to the evaluation process. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2130 10.35699/2237-5864.2016.2130 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2130 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35699/2237-5864.2016.2130 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rdes/article/view/2130/1394 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; Vol. 6 No. 2 (2016); 223-246 Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; Vol. 6 Núm. 2 (2016); 223-246 Revista Docência do Ensino Superior; v. 6 n. 2 (2016); 223-246 2237-5864 2358-6338 reponame:Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online) |
collection |
Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Docência do Ensino Superior (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadocenciaensinosuperior@ufmg.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174636973129728 |