Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of Rationality

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maia, Carlos Alvarez
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15008
Resumo:   The historiography of scientific studies has suffered from a great impact, that is rarely referred to, from anthropological analyses of magic in so-called primitive societies. The emphasis brought by criticism during the 1950/1960’s of Evans-Pritchard’s 1937 classic, Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande, brought a fresh look at certainties already consolidated in Western thought, especially those relating to rational human characteristics and science. For the history, these criticisms were interesting because they were presented science as a historically situated activity, in the same way as magic. It favours, therefore, the proximity of historians tout court with the history of the sciences that resists its absences even today. This renewal helped to create a scenario that would enable David Bloor to develop the strong program of Sociology of Knowledge in the 1970s. Such a program indicates the analogous process that involves both the social production of beliefs and that of scientific truths. In this paper I evaluate the proximity of magic-science from the point of view of contemporary studies about scientific activity, questioning the concepts of rationality and logic as if they were exclusive qualities of scientific activity.
id UFMG-26_c8962ef67ea60769bebb46d45e9ca41a
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/15008
network_acronym_str UFMG-26
network_name_str Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
repository_id_str
spelling Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of RationalityScience and MagicRationalityLogicHistoriography of Science  The historiography of scientific studies has suffered from a great impact, that is rarely referred to, from anthropological analyses of magic in so-called primitive societies. The emphasis brought by criticism during the 1950/1960’s of Evans-Pritchard’s 1937 classic, Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande, brought a fresh look at certainties already consolidated in Western thought, especially those relating to rational human characteristics and science. For the history, these criticisms were interesting because they were presented science as a historically situated activity, in the same way as magic. It favours, therefore, the proximity of historians tout court with the history of the sciences that resists its absences even today. This renewal helped to create a scenario that would enable David Bloor to develop the strong program of Sociology of Knowledge in the 1970s. Such a program indicates the analogous process that involves both the social production of beliefs and that of scientific truths. In this paper I evaluate the proximity of magic-science from the point of view of contemporary studies about scientific activity, questioning the concepts of rationality and logic as if they were exclusive qualities of scientific activity.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2017-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/1500810.24117/2526-2270.2017.i3.02Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No. 3 (2017): For the Diversity of the Historiography of ScienceTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; Núm. 3 (2017): For the Diversity of the Historiography of ScienceTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No 3 (2017): For the Diversity of the Historiography of ScienceTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; n. 3 (2017): For the Diversity of the Historiography of Science2526-2270reponame:Transversal (Belo Horizonte)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15008/11968Copyright (c) 2017 Carlos Alvarez Maiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaia, Carlos Alvarez2021-07-26T19:45:39Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/15008Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/oaimauroconde@ufmg.br2526-22702526-2270opendoar:2021-07-26T19:45:39Transversal (Belo Horizonte) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of Rationality
title Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of Rationality
spellingShingle Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of Rationality
Maia, Carlos Alvarez
Science and Magic
Rationality
Logic
Historiography of Science
title_short Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of Rationality
title_full Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of Rationality
title_fullStr Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of Rationality
title_full_unstemmed Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of Rationality
title_sort Magic vs. Science in the Historiography of Science: The Social-Historical Construction of Rationality
author Maia, Carlos Alvarez
author_facet Maia, Carlos Alvarez
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maia, Carlos Alvarez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Science and Magic
Rationality
Logic
Historiography of Science
topic Science and Magic
Rationality
Logic
Historiography of Science
description   The historiography of scientific studies has suffered from a great impact, that is rarely referred to, from anthropological analyses of magic in so-called primitive societies. The emphasis brought by criticism during the 1950/1960’s of Evans-Pritchard’s 1937 classic, Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande, brought a fresh look at certainties already consolidated in Western thought, especially those relating to rational human characteristics and science. For the history, these criticisms were interesting because they were presented science as a historically situated activity, in the same way as magic. It favours, therefore, the proximity of historians tout court with the history of the sciences that resists its absences even today. This renewal helped to create a scenario that would enable David Bloor to develop the strong program of Sociology of Knowledge in the 1970s. Such a program indicates the analogous process that involves both the social production of beliefs and that of scientific truths. In this paper I evaluate the proximity of magic-science from the point of view of contemporary studies about scientific activity, questioning the concepts of rationality and logic as if they were exclusive qualities of scientific activity.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15008
10.24117/2526-2270.2017.i3.02
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15008
identifier_str_mv 10.24117/2526-2270.2017.i3.02
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15008/11968
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Carlos Alvarez Maia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Carlos Alvarez Maia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No. 3 (2017): For the Diversity of the Historiography of Science
Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; Núm. 3 (2017): For the Diversity of the Historiography of Science
Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No 3 (2017): For the Diversity of the Historiography of Science
Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; n. 3 (2017): For the Diversity of the Historiography of Science
2526-2270
reponame:Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
collection Transversal (Belo Horizonte)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Transversal (Belo Horizonte) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mauroconde@ufmg.br
_version_ 1754913651024723968