Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of Sciences
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Transversal (Belo Horizonte) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15029 |
Resumo: | The metaphor is used in the construction process of scientific knowledge. There are, however, metaphors that do not suit the objects they should represent, which thus impacts the accuracy of the knowledge which derives from these objects. It is the case of the machine metaphor, when resorted to in the study of living organisms. Canguilhem has tackled problems it created in twentieth-century life sciences head on. In his criticism, he links the analysis of Descartes’ work to his own philosophical thesis on “biological normativity”. By doing so, he so sheds a light on the pitfalls, both historical and biological, over which the machine metaphor stumbles. He thereby orders sciences to periodically make sure of the relevance of their metaphors and explanatory models to their objects. |
id |
UFMG-26_f8a290683b156841eb6d01cb48f8d00b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/15029 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-26 |
network_name_str |
Transversal (Belo Horizonte) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of SciencesMetaphorHistory of sciencePhilosophy of biologyDescartesScientific practicesThe metaphor is used in the construction process of scientific knowledge. There are, however, metaphors that do not suit the objects they should represent, which thus impacts the accuracy of the knowledge which derives from these objects. It is the case of the machine metaphor, when resorted to in the study of living organisms. Canguilhem has tackled problems it created in twentieth-century life sciences head on. In his criticism, he links the analysis of Descartes’ work to his own philosophical thesis on “biological normativity”. By doing so, he so sheds a light on the pitfalls, both historical and biological, over which the machine metaphor stumbles. He thereby orders sciences to periodically make sure of the relevance of their metaphors and explanatory models to their objects.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2018-06-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/1502910.24117/2526-2270.2018.i4.13Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No. 4 (2018): Dossier Georges CanguilhemTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; Núm. 4 (2018): Dossier Georges CanguilhemTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No 4 (2018): Dossier Georges CanguilhemTransversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; n. 4 (2018): Dossier Georges Canguilhem2526-2270reponame:Transversal (Belo Horizonte)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15029/11989Copyright (c) 2018 Océane Fianthttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFiant, Océane2021-07-26T19:45:51Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/15029Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/oaimauroconde@ufmg.br2526-22702526-2270opendoar:2021-07-26T19:45:51Transversal (Belo Horizonte) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of Sciences |
title |
Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of Sciences Fiant, Océane Metaphor History of science Philosophy of biology Descartes Scientific practices |
title_short |
Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of Sciences |
title_full |
Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of Sciences |
title_fullStr |
Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of Sciences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of Sciences |
title_sort |
Canguilhem and the Machine Metaphor in Life Sciences: History of Science and Philosophy of Biology at the Service of Sciences |
author |
Fiant, Océane |
author_facet |
Fiant, Océane |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fiant, Océane |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Metaphor History of science Philosophy of biology Descartes Scientific practices |
topic |
Metaphor History of science Philosophy of biology Descartes Scientific practices |
description |
The metaphor is used in the construction process of scientific knowledge. There are, however, metaphors that do not suit the objects they should represent, which thus impacts the accuracy of the knowledge which derives from these objects. It is the case of the machine metaphor, when resorted to in the study of living organisms. Canguilhem has tackled problems it created in twentieth-century life sciences head on. In his criticism, he links the analysis of Descartes’ work to his own philosophical thesis on “biological normativity”. By doing so, he so sheds a light on the pitfalls, both historical and biological, over which the machine metaphor stumbles. He thereby orders sciences to periodically make sure of the relevance of their metaphors and explanatory models to their objects. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15029 10.24117/2526-2270.2018.i4.13 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15029 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.24117/2526-2270.2018.i4.13 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/15029/11989 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Océane Fiant https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Océane Fiant https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No. 4 (2018): Dossier Georges Canguilhem Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; Núm. 4 (2018): Dossier Georges Canguilhem Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; No 4 (2018): Dossier Georges Canguilhem Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; n. 4 (2018): Dossier Georges Canguilhem 2526-2270 reponame:Transversal (Belo Horizonte) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Transversal (Belo Horizonte) |
collection |
Transversal (Belo Horizonte) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Transversal (Belo Horizonte) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mauroconde@ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1754913651051986944 |