Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libel

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Petiz, Martin Magnus
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e42552
Resumo: Hate speech is an important problem for the Brazilian legal debate. Its reverberation can be seen as a reflection of our past, full of injustices against minority groups. It is a famous argument in American political theory that hate speech is covered by freedom of speech. It would only be necessary to repair afterwards any psychic damage, a thesis that has been accepted by the labor jurisprudence in Brazil in cases of indirect discrimination in the workplace. This article seeks to problematize this thesis based on Jeremy Waldron's arguments in the book “The harm in the hate speech” (2012), in order to promote a criticism based on principles of justice to this line of thought in Brazil. The hypothesis of this article is that tolerance is a diffuse right that is part of what is called in the labor law doctrine “the right to an adequate work environment.” This is because tolerance ensures the conditions for the exercise of autonomy that accompanies the moral status of dignity. Unlike cases of offenses, it will be argued that, for cases of hate speech, not only the filing of a class action for the defense of a diffuse right, but also the prior regulation of this type of speech, which, if it circulates freely, may have the effect of compromising the conditions for the exercise of autonomy inherent to the dignity of the agents of a certain minority group, affecting, for example, their chances of obtaining promotions and social esteem for their work.
id UFMG-28_5b76c7687fdcd8366443e28a43978eb6
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42552
network_acronym_str UFMG-28
network_name_str Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libelDerecho a la tolerancia, a un entorno de trabajo adecuado y a restricciones a la incitación al odio como la difamación colectivaDireito à tolerância, ao meio ambiente de trabalho adequado e a restrições ao discurso de ódio como difamação de grupoFreedom of expressionToleranceJeremy WaldronLabour lawWork enviornmentLiberdade de expressãoTolerânciaJeremy WaldronDireito do trabalhoMeio ambiente do trabalhoLibertad de expressionToleranciaJeremy WaldronDerecho del trabajoEntorno laboralHate speech is an important problem for the Brazilian legal debate. Its reverberation can be seen as a reflection of our past, full of injustices against minority groups. It is a famous argument in American political theory that hate speech is covered by freedom of speech. It would only be necessary to repair afterwards any psychic damage, a thesis that has been accepted by the labor jurisprudence in Brazil in cases of indirect discrimination in the workplace. This article seeks to problematize this thesis based on Jeremy Waldron's arguments in the book “The harm in the hate speech” (2012), in order to promote a criticism based on principles of justice to this line of thought in Brazil. The hypothesis of this article is that tolerance is a diffuse right that is part of what is called in the labor law doctrine “the right to an adequate work environment.” This is because tolerance ensures the conditions for the exercise of autonomy that accompanies the moral status of dignity. Unlike cases of offenses, it will be argued that, for cases of hate speech, not only the filing of a class action for the defense of a diffuse right, but also the prior regulation of this type of speech, which, if it circulates freely, may have the effect of compromising the conditions for the exercise of autonomy inherent to the dignity of the agents of a certain minority group, affecting, for example, their chances of obtaining promotions and social esteem for their work.El discurso odio es un problema importante para el debate jurídico brasileño. Su reverberación puede verse como un reflejo de nuestro pasado, lleno de injusticias contra los grupos minoritarios. Es un famoso argumento de la teoría política estadounidense que el discurso del odio está amparado por la libertad de expresión. Sólo sería necesario reparar posteriormente cualquier daño psíquico, tesis que ha sido aceptada por la jurisprudencia laboral en Brasil en casos de discriminación indirecta en el ambiente de trabajo. Este artículo busca problematizar esta tesis a partir de los argumentos de Jeremy Waldron en el libro "The harm in the hate speech" (2012), con el fin de promover una crítica basada en principios de justicia a esta corriente en Brasil. La hipótesis de este artículo es que la tolerancia es un derecho difuso que forma parte de lo que en la doctrina jurídico-laboral se denomina “derecho a un entorno de trabajo adecuado.” Esto se debe a que la tolerancia garantiza las condiciones para el ejercicio de la autonomía que acompaña al estatus moral de la dignidad. A diferencia de los casos de ofensas, se argumentará que, en los casos de discursos de odio, no sólo procede la interposición de una acción colectiva para la defensa de un derecho difuso, sino también la regulación previa de este tipo de discursos que, si circulan libremente, pueden tener el efecto de comprometer las condiciones de ejercicio de la autonomía inherente a la dignidad de los agentes de un determinado grupo minoritario, afectando, por ejemplo, a sus posibilidades de obtener ascensos y a la valoración social de su trabajo.O discurso de ódio é um problema importante para o debate jurídico brasileiro. A sua reverberação pode ser vista como reflexo do nosso passado, recheado de injustiças contra grupos minoritários. Ocorre que é um argumento famoso na teoria política estadunidense a ideia de que o discurso de ódio estaria abarcado pela liberdade de expressão. Caberia apenas a reparação posterior a eventual dano psíquico, tese que vem sendo recepcionada pela jurisprudência trabalhista no Brasil em casos de discriminação indireta no ambiente de trabalho. Este artigo busca problematizar essa tese a partir dos argumentos de Jeremy Waldron no livro “The harm in the hate speech” (2012), para fins de promover uma crítica fundada em princípios de justiça a essa corrente no Brasil. A hipótese deste artigo é a de que a tolerância é um direito difuso integrante do que se chama na doutrina justrabalhista de “direito a um meio ambiente do trabalho adequado.” Isso porque a tolerância assegura as condições para o exercício da autonomia que acompanha o status moral da dignidade. Diferentemente de casos de ofensas, se defenderá que, para os casos de discurso de ódio, caberá não só o ajuizamento de ação coletiva para a defesa de direito difuso, como também a regulação prévia desse tipo de discurso, que, caso circule livremente, poderá ter o efeito de comprometer as condições de exercício da autonomia inerente à dignidade dos agentes de certo grupo minoritário, afetando, por exemplo, as suas chances de obter promoções e estima social pelo seu trabalho.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais2023-09-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e4255210.35699/2525-8036.2023.42552Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): International Studies: from European Union to the world; 1 - 30Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2023): Estudios Internacionales: desde la Unión Europea para el mundo; 1 - 30Revista de Ciências do Estado; v. 8 n. 2 (2023): Estudos Internacionais: da União Europeia para o mundo; 1 - 302525-80362595-6051reponame:Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGporhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e42552/e42552Copyright (c) 2023 Martin Magnus Petizhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPetiz, Martin Magnus2023-12-22T15:27:33Zoai:periodicos.ufmg.br:article/42552Revistahttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revicePUBhttps://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/oairevistadece@gmail.com || Gabriel.afns1@gmail.com2525-80362525-8036opendoar:2023-12-22T15:27:33Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libel
Derecho a la tolerancia, a un entorno de trabajo adecuado y a restricciones a la incitación al odio como la difamación colectiva
Direito à tolerância, ao meio ambiente de trabalho adequado e a restrições ao discurso de ódio como difamação de grupo
title Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libel
spellingShingle Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libel
Petiz, Martin Magnus
Freedom of expression
Tolerance
Jeremy Waldron
Labour law
Work enviornment
Liberdade de expressão
Tolerância
Jeremy Waldron
Direito do trabalho
Meio ambiente do trabalho
Libertad de expression
Tolerancia
Jeremy Waldron
Derecho del trabajo
Entorno laboral
title_short Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libel
title_full Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libel
title_fullStr Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libel
title_full_unstemmed Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libel
title_sort Right to tolerance, to a proper work environment and to restrictions to hate speech as group libel
author Petiz, Martin Magnus
author_facet Petiz, Martin Magnus
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Petiz, Martin Magnus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Freedom of expression
Tolerance
Jeremy Waldron
Labour law
Work enviornment
Liberdade de expressão
Tolerância
Jeremy Waldron
Direito do trabalho
Meio ambiente do trabalho
Libertad de expression
Tolerancia
Jeremy Waldron
Derecho del trabajo
Entorno laboral
topic Freedom of expression
Tolerance
Jeremy Waldron
Labour law
Work enviornment
Liberdade de expressão
Tolerância
Jeremy Waldron
Direito do trabalho
Meio ambiente do trabalho
Libertad de expression
Tolerancia
Jeremy Waldron
Derecho del trabajo
Entorno laboral
description Hate speech is an important problem for the Brazilian legal debate. Its reverberation can be seen as a reflection of our past, full of injustices against minority groups. It is a famous argument in American political theory that hate speech is covered by freedom of speech. It would only be necessary to repair afterwards any psychic damage, a thesis that has been accepted by the labor jurisprudence in Brazil in cases of indirect discrimination in the workplace. This article seeks to problematize this thesis based on Jeremy Waldron's arguments in the book “The harm in the hate speech” (2012), in order to promote a criticism based on principles of justice to this line of thought in Brazil. The hypothesis of this article is that tolerance is a diffuse right that is part of what is called in the labor law doctrine “the right to an adequate work environment.” This is because tolerance ensures the conditions for the exercise of autonomy that accompanies the moral status of dignity. Unlike cases of offenses, it will be argued that, for cases of hate speech, not only the filing of a class action for the defense of a diffuse right, but also the prior regulation of this type of speech, which, if it circulates freely, may have the effect of compromising the conditions for the exercise of autonomy inherent to the dignity of the agents of a certain minority group, affecting, for example, their chances of obtaining promotions and social esteem for their work.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e42552
10.35699/2525-8036.2023.42552
url https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e42552
identifier_str_mv 10.35699/2525-8036.2023.42552
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/revice/article/view/e42552/e42552
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Martin Magnus Petiz
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Martin Magnus Petiz
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): International Studies: from European Union to the world; 1 - 30
Revista de Ciências do Estado; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2023): Estudios Internacionales: desde la Unión Europea para el mundo; 1 - 30
Revista de Ciências do Estado; v. 8 n. 2 (2023): Estudos Internacionais: da União Europeia para o mundo; 1 - 30
2525-8036
2595-6051
reponame:Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
collection Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências do Estado (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadece@gmail.com || Gabriel.afns1@gmail.com
_version_ 1796798282277584896

Registros relacionados