CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Valério, Kátia Modesto
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Mattos, Andrea Machado de Almeida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/12252
Resumo: The objective of this paper is to foster reflections on the similarities and differences between the Communicative Approach, one of the best-known methods for teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) around the world, and Critical Literacy, a relatively recent trend in the Brazilian EFL scenario, as suggested by the National Guidelines for High School Teaching (BRASIL, 2006). First, we will address the theoretical traditions that give origin to the two teaching approaches, explaining their main concepts. Then, we will discuss the similarities between the two approaches, as well as their main differences. We claim that the two teaching approaches, however different in their epistemological underpinnings, are not incompatible, but complementary. Finally, we suggest an example of an integrated activity that aims to reconcile the objectives of the two approaches.
id UFMG-7_f7e057c4a5432784e0891a267a35d4f3
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.letras.ufmg.br:article/12252
network_acronym_str UFMG-7
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONSCommunicative Approach, Critical Literacy, English as a Foreign LanguageThe objective of this paper is to foster reflections on the similarities and differences between the Communicative Approach, one of the best-known methods for teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) around the world, and Critical Literacy, a relatively recent trend in the Brazilian EFL scenario, as suggested by the National Guidelines for High School Teaching (BRASIL, 2006). First, we will address the theoretical traditions that give origin to the two teaching approaches, explaining their main concepts. Then, we will discuss the similarities between the two approaches, as well as their main differences. We claim that the two teaching approaches, however different in their epistemological underpinnings, are not incompatible, but complementary. Finally, we suggest an example of an integrated activity that aims to reconcile the objectives of the two approaches.Faculdade de Letras - Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisValério, Kátia ModestoMattos, Andrea Machado de Almeida2018-08-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/12252Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 18, No 2 (2018)Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 18, No 2 (2018)Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 18, No 2 (2018)1984-63981676-0786reponame:Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGenghttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/12252/1125611669http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/downloadSuppFile/12252/1612http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/downloadSuppFile/12252/1613Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicadainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-08-24T18:55:29Zoai:periodicos.letras.ufmg.br:article/12252Revistahttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/indexPUBhttp://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/oairblasecretaria@gmail.com||periodicosfaleufmg@gmail.com1984-63981676-0786opendoar:2018-08-24T18:55:29Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONS
title CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONS
spellingShingle CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONS
Valério, Kátia Modesto
Communicative Approach, Critical Literacy, English as a Foreign Language
title_short CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONS
title_full CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONS
title_fullStr CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONS
title_full_unstemmed CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONS
title_sort CRITICAL LITERACY AND THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH: GAPS AND INTERSECTIONS
author Valério, Kátia Modesto
author_facet Valério, Kátia Modesto
Mattos, Andrea Machado de Almeida
author_role author
author2 Mattos, Andrea Machado de Almeida
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Valério, Kátia Modesto
Mattos, Andrea Machado de Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Communicative Approach, Critical Literacy, English as a Foreign Language
topic Communicative Approach, Critical Literacy, English as a Foreign Language
description The objective of this paper is to foster reflections on the similarities and differences between the Communicative Approach, one of the best-known methods for teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) around the world, and Critical Literacy, a relatively recent trend in the Brazilian EFL scenario, as suggested by the National Guidelines for High School Teaching (BRASIL, 2006). First, we will address the theoretical traditions that give origin to the two teaching approaches, explaining their main concepts. Then, we will discuss the similarities between the two approaches, as well as their main differences. We claim that the two teaching approaches, however different in their epistemological underpinnings, are not incompatible, but complementary. Finally, we suggest an example of an integrated activity that aims to reconcile the objectives of the two approaches.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-24
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/12252
url http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/12252
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/view/12252/1125611669
http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/downloadSuppFile/12252/1612
http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/rbla/article/downloadSuppFile/12252/1613
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Letras - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 18, No 2 (2018)
Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 18, No 2 (2018)
Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada; Vol 18, No 2 (2018)
1984-6398
1676-0786
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rblasecretaria@gmail.com||periodicosfaleufmg@gmail.com
_version_ 1799711102097948672