Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseed
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352016000401069 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Sensory and instrumental analyses evaluated the meat and fat characteristics of feedlot-finished steers fed a diet containing cottonseed. Global impression, texture, meat color, and fat color were assessed. Thirty Nellore bulls with an average age of 30 ± 6 months and initial body weight of 382.7 ± 28.4kg were kept in feedlot stalls and fed the following cottonseed levels: 0; 2.22 %; 4.44 %; 6.66 %; 8.88 %; 11.11 % of the dietary dry matter. The cottonseed used in this experiment had an average free gossypol content of 4.5g/kg of cottonseed. The overall impression of the samples, assessed by the triangle test for difference, did not differ for more than 62 % of the panelists (P>0.01). The shear strength of roasted meat varied from 6.00 to 6.54kg. According to texture profile analysis (TPA), the hardness, springiness, and chewiness of roast meat ranged from 24.15 to 28.01 N, 0.52 to 0.56, 8.42 to 11.01 N, respectively; of raw meat, 9.51 to 13.86 N, 0.26 to 0.29, and 1.38 to 1.81 N, respectively. The different treatments did not affect meat texture, meat color, or fat color (P>0.05). Meat color, luminosity, and red intensity ranged from 37.71 to 42.85, 20.68 to 25.25, and 6.74 to 8.61, respectively; fat color, luminosity, and yellow intensity ranged from 62.26 to 63.78, 11.13 to 11.62, and 10.53 to 10.86, respectively. Cottonseed intake of up to 1.13kg/animal/day, equivalent to a free gossypol intake of 5.05g/animal/day, in place of soybean meal and ground corn, did not significantly change the global sensory impression, texture, and color of the meat and fat. |
id |
UFMG-8_6b43b26f9b9490ceeaf351802a70335e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-09352016000401069 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG-8 |
network_name_str |
Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseedmeattexturegossypolwhole cottonseedABSTRACT Sensory and instrumental analyses evaluated the meat and fat characteristics of feedlot-finished steers fed a diet containing cottonseed. Global impression, texture, meat color, and fat color were assessed. Thirty Nellore bulls with an average age of 30 ± 6 months and initial body weight of 382.7 ± 28.4kg were kept in feedlot stalls and fed the following cottonseed levels: 0; 2.22 %; 4.44 %; 6.66 %; 8.88 %; 11.11 % of the dietary dry matter. The cottonseed used in this experiment had an average free gossypol content of 4.5g/kg of cottonseed. The overall impression of the samples, assessed by the triangle test for difference, did not differ for more than 62 % of the panelists (P>0.01). The shear strength of roasted meat varied from 6.00 to 6.54kg. According to texture profile analysis (TPA), the hardness, springiness, and chewiness of roast meat ranged from 24.15 to 28.01 N, 0.52 to 0.56, 8.42 to 11.01 N, respectively; of raw meat, 9.51 to 13.86 N, 0.26 to 0.29, and 1.38 to 1.81 N, respectively. The different treatments did not affect meat texture, meat color, or fat color (P>0.05). Meat color, luminosity, and red intensity ranged from 37.71 to 42.85, 20.68 to 25.25, and 6.74 to 8.61, respectively; fat color, luminosity, and yellow intensity ranged from 62.26 to 63.78, 11.13 to 11.62, and 10.53 to 10.86, respectively. Cottonseed intake of up to 1.13kg/animal/day, equivalent to a free gossypol intake of 5.05g/animal/day, in place of soybean meal and ground corn, did not significantly change the global sensory impression, texture, and color of the meat and fat.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352016000401069Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.68 n.4 2016reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG10.1590/1678-4162-8636info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGomes,V.S.Mano,S.B.Freitas,M.Q.Santos,M.D.Conte Júnior,C.A.Silva,J.M.Santos,E.B.eng2016-08-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-09352016000401069Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/abmvz/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpjournal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br1678-41620102-0935opendoar:2016-08-18T00:00Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseed |
title |
Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseed |
spellingShingle |
Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseed Gomes,V.S. meat texture gossypol whole cottonseed |
title_short |
Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseed |
title_full |
Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseed |
title_fullStr |
Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseed |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseed |
title_sort |
Meat characteristics of cattle fed diets containing whole cottonseed |
author |
Gomes,V.S. |
author_facet |
Gomes,V.S. Mano,S.B. Freitas,M.Q. Santos,M.D. Conte Júnior,C.A. Silva,J.M. Santos,E.B. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mano,S.B. Freitas,M.Q. Santos,M.D. Conte Júnior,C.A. Silva,J.M. Santos,E.B. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gomes,V.S. Mano,S.B. Freitas,M.Q. Santos,M.D. Conte Júnior,C.A. Silva,J.M. Santos,E.B. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
meat texture gossypol whole cottonseed |
topic |
meat texture gossypol whole cottonseed |
description |
ABSTRACT Sensory and instrumental analyses evaluated the meat and fat characteristics of feedlot-finished steers fed a diet containing cottonseed. Global impression, texture, meat color, and fat color were assessed. Thirty Nellore bulls with an average age of 30 ± 6 months and initial body weight of 382.7 ± 28.4kg were kept in feedlot stalls and fed the following cottonseed levels: 0; 2.22 %; 4.44 %; 6.66 %; 8.88 %; 11.11 % of the dietary dry matter. The cottonseed used in this experiment had an average free gossypol content of 4.5g/kg of cottonseed. The overall impression of the samples, assessed by the triangle test for difference, did not differ for more than 62 % of the panelists (P>0.01). The shear strength of roasted meat varied from 6.00 to 6.54kg. According to texture profile analysis (TPA), the hardness, springiness, and chewiness of roast meat ranged from 24.15 to 28.01 N, 0.52 to 0.56, 8.42 to 11.01 N, respectively; of raw meat, 9.51 to 13.86 N, 0.26 to 0.29, and 1.38 to 1.81 N, respectively. The different treatments did not affect meat texture, meat color, or fat color (P>0.05). Meat color, luminosity, and red intensity ranged from 37.71 to 42.85, 20.68 to 25.25, and 6.74 to 8.61, respectively; fat color, luminosity, and yellow intensity ranged from 62.26 to 63.78, 11.13 to 11.62, and 10.53 to 10.86, respectively. Cottonseed intake of up to 1.13kg/animal/day, equivalent to a free gossypol intake of 5.05g/animal/day, in place of soybean meal and ground corn, did not significantly change the global sensory impression, texture, and color of the meat and fat. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352016000401069 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352016000401069 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-4162-8636 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.68 n.4 2016 reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) |
collection |
Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
journal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br |
_version_ |
1750220889970966528 |