Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Azevedo,M.S.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Côrte,F.D.D.L., Brass,K.E., Gallio,M., Dau,S.L, Pozzobon,R., Lopes,M.A.F, Lopes,L.F.D
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352015000601475
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the track surface on which horses are examined, regarding the phase of lameness presentation. Ten horses with lameness in at least one limb were evaluated with wireless inertial sensors on three track surfaces (concrete, loose sand and grass). Six crossover track sequences were established. The variables vector sum, maximum and minimum height of the head and pelvis, variation coefficient of the maximum and minimum height of the head and pelvis were analyzed using ANOVA, followed by Tukey test to compare means between track surface and sequence, at 5% significance level. The lameness phase (impact or pushoff) was analyzed considering the proportion of affected animals. There were no differences on vector sum, maximum and minimum height or variation coefficient of head and pelvis. Difference was observed on the number of strides registered on sand compared to grass and concrete (p <0.0001) for fore and hindlimbs. Impact lameness on forelimbs was presented by a larger number of animals on the concrete surface; pushoff lameness was more evident on the grass surface. In the hindlimbs, impact lameness was more evident on the grass surface, while pushoff lameness was in greater number of animals on concrete surfaces. The track sequence on which horses were trotted during evaluation does not seem to be a factor, but the number of lame horses and the phase of lameness manifestation can vary between track surfaces, as some horses showed impact lameness on soft ground and elevation lameness on hard ground.
id UFMG-8_ca72f94879b07a2196c6f063d5c30af5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-09352015000601475
network_acronym_str UFMG-8
network_name_str Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trottedhorseimpact lamenesslameness locatorobjective evaluationpush-off lamenessThis study aimed to evaluate the influence of the track surface on which horses are examined, regarding the phase of lameness presentation. Ten horses with lameness in at least one limb were evaluated with wireless inertial sensors on three track surfaces (concrete, loose sand and grass). Six crossover track sequences were established. The variables vector sum, maximum and minimum height of the head and pelvis, variation coefficient of the maximum and minimum height of the head and pelvis were analyzed using ANOVA, followed by Tukey test to compare means between track surface and sequence, at 5% significance level. The lameness phase (impact or pushoff) was analyzed considering the proportion of affected animals. There were no differences on vector sum, maximum and minimum height or variation coefficient of head and pelvis. Difference was observed on the number of strides registered on sand compared to grass and concrete (p <0.0001) for fore and hindlimbs. Impact lameness on forelimbs was presented by a larger number of animals on the concrete surface; pushoff lameness was more evident on the grass surface. In the hindlimbs, impact lameness was more evident on the grass surface, while pushoff lameness was in greater number of animals on concrete surfaces. The track sequence on which horses were trotted during evaluation does not seem to be a factor, but the number of lame horses and the phase of lameness manifestation can vary between track surfaces, as some horses showed impact lameness on soft ground and elevation lameness on hard ground.Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352015000601475Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.67 n.6 2015reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG10.1590/1678-4162-8454info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAzevedo,M.S.Côrte,F.D.D.L.Brass,K.E.Gallio,M.Dau,S.LPozzobon,R.Lopes,M.A.FLopes,L.F.Deng2015-12-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-09352015000601475Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/abmvz/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpjournal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br1678-41620102-0935opendoar:2015-12-09T00:00Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted
title Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted
spellingShingle Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted
Azevedo,M.S.
horse
impact lameness
lameness locator
objective evaluation
push-off lameness
title_short Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted
title_full Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted
title_fullStr Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted
title_full_unstemmed Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted
title_sort Impact or push-off lameness presentation is not altered by the type of track surface where horses are trotted
author Azevedo,M.S.
author_facet Azevedo,M.S.
Côrte,F.D.D.L.
Brass,K.E.
Gallio,M.
Dau,S.L
Pozzobon,R.
Lopes,M.A.F
Lopes,L.F.D
author_role author
author2 Côrte,F.D.D.L.
Brass,K.E.
Gallio,M.
Dau,S.L
Pozzobon,R.
Lopes,M.A.F
Lopes,L.F.D
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Azevedo,M.S.
Côrte,F.D.D.L.
Brass,K.E.
Gallio,M.
Dau,S.L
Pozzobon,R.
Lopes,M.A.F
Lopes,L.F.D
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv horse
impact lameness
lameness locator
objective evaluation
push-off lameness
topic horse
impact lameness
lameness locator
objective evaluation
push-off lameness
description This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the track surface on which horses are examined, regarding the phase of lameness presentation. Ten horses with lameness in at least one limb were evaluated with wireless inertial sensors on three track surfaces (concrete, loose sand and grass). Six crossover track sequences were established. The variables vector sum, maximum and minimum height of the head and pelvis, variation coefficient of the maximum and minimum height of the head and pelvis were analyzed using ANOVA, followed by Tukey test to compare means between track surface and sequence, at 5% significance level. The lameness phase (impact or pushoff) was analyzed considering the proportion of affected animals. There were no differences on vector sum, maximum and minimum height or variation coefficient of head and pelvis. Difference was observed on the number of strides registered on sand compared to grass and concrete (p <0.0001) for fore and hindlimbs. Impact lameness on forelimbs was presented by a larger number of animals on the concrete surface; pushoff lameness was more evident on the grass surface. In the hindlimbs, impact lameness was more evident on the grass surface, while pushoff lameness was in greater number of animals on concrete surfaces. The track sequence on which horses were trotted during evaluation does not seem to be a factor, but the number of lame horses and the phase of lameness manifestation can vary between track surfaces, as some horses showed impact lameness on soft ground and elevation lameness on hard ground.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352015000601475
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-09352015000601475
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-4162-8454
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia v.67 n.6 2015
reponame:Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
collection Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivo brasileiro de medicina veterinária e zootecnia (Online) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv journal@vet.ufmg.br||abmvz.artigo@abmvz.org.br
_version_ 1750220889094356992