Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Laura J. Sonter
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Victoria F. Griffiths, Kendall Jones, Kei Sochi, Philippe Puydarrieux, Fabien Quétier, Helga Rainer, Hugo Rainey, Dilys Roe, Musnanda Satar, Britaldo Silveira Soares Filho, Jeremy S. Simmonds, Malcolm Starkey, Kerry Ten Kate, Ray Victurine, Amrei Von Hase, Jessie A. Wells, Martine Maron, James E. M. Watson, Julia P. G. Jones, Joseph M. Kiesecker, Hugo M. Costa, Leon Bennun, Stephen Edwards, Hedley S. Grantham
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52343
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3986
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-5908
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9402
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-4628
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-594X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-0353
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-3299
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-946X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-7388
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-5108
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-5789
Resumo: Many nations use ecological compensation policies to address negative impacts of development projects and achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, failures are widely reported. We use spatial simulation models to quantify potential net impacts of alternative compensation policies on biodiversity (indicated by native vegetation) and two ecosystem services (carbon storage, sediment retention) across four case studies (in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mozambique). No policy achieves NNL of biodiversity in any case study. Two factors limit their potential success: the land available for compensation (existing vegetation to protect or cleared land to restore), and expected counterfactual biodiversity losses (unregulated vegetation clearing). Compensation also fails to slow regional biodiversity declines because policies regulate only a subset of sectors, and expanding policy scope requires more land than is available for compensation activities. Avoidance of impacts remains essential in achieving NNL goals, particularly once opportunities for compensation are exhausted.
id UFMG_12c20c882c1e09323aaa9b329865a5ea
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/52343
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2023-04-20T21:18:48Z2023-04-20T21:18:48Z2020-04-29111207211https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15861-12041-1723http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52343http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3986http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-5908http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9402http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-4628http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-594Xhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-0353http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-3299http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-946Xhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-7388http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-5108http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-5789Many nations use ecological compensation policies to address negative impacts of development projects and achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, failures are widely reported. We use spatial simulation models to quantify potential net impacts of alternative compensation policies on biodiversity (indicated by native vegetation) and two ecosystem services (carbon storage, sediment retention) across four case studies (in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mozambique). No policy achieves NNL of biodiversity in any case study. Two factors limit their potential success: the land available for compensation (existing vegetation to protect or cleared land to restore), and expected counterfactual biodiversity losses (unregulated vegetation clearing). Compensation also fails to slow regional biodiversity declines because policies regulate only a subset of sectors, and expanding policy scope requires more land than is available for compensation activities. Avoidance of impacts remains essential in achieving NNL goals, particularly once opportunities for compensation are exhausted.engUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGBrasilIGC - DEPARTAMENTO DE CARTOGRAFIANature CommunicationsEcologiaBiodiversidadeBiodiversidade - LegislaçãoBiodiversity offsetsCompensationDINAMICA EGOLocal conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goalsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15861-1#rightslinkLaura J. SonterVictoria F. GriffithsKendall JonesKei SochiPhilippe PuydarrieuxFabien QuétierHelga RainerHugo RaineyDilys RoeMusnanda SatarBritaldo Silveira Soares FilhoJeremy S. SimmondsMalcolm StarkeyKerry Ten KateRay VicturineAmrei Von HaseJessie A. WellsMartine MaronJames E. M. WatsonJulia P. G. JonesJoseph M. KieseckerHugo M. CostaLeon BennunStephen EdwardsHedley S. Granthamapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGLICENSELicense.txtLicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82042https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/52343/1/License.txtfa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22MD51ORIGINALlocalconditionsandpolicy.pdflocalconditionsandpolicy.pdfapplication/pdf613440https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/52343/2/localconditionsandpolicy.pdfca976ce746c044e0497c0db430b0cc2cMD521843/523432023-04-20 18:18:48.952oai:repositorio.ufmg.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2023-04-20T21:18:48Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
title Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
spellingShingle Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
Laura J. Sonter
Biodiversity offsets
Compensation
DINAMICA EGO
Ecologia
Biodiversidade
Biodiversidade - Legislação
title_short Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
title_full Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
title_fullStr Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
title_full_unstemmed Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
title_sort Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
author Laura J. Sonter
author_facet Laura J. Sonter
Victoria F. Griffiths
Kendall Jones
Kei Sochi
Philippe Puydarrieux
Fabien Quétier
Helga Rainer
Hugo Rainey
Dilys Roe
Musnanda Satar
Britaldo Silveira Soares Filho
Jeremy S. Simmonds
Malcolm Starkey
Kerry Ten Kate
Ray Victurine
Amrei Von Hase
Jessie A. Wells
Martine Maron
James E. M. Watson
Julia P. G. Jones
Joseph M. Kiesecker
Hugo M. Costa
Leon Bennun
Stephen Edwards
Hedley S. Grantham
author_role author
author2 Victoria F. Griffiths
Kendall Jones
Kei Sochi
Philippe Puydarrieux
Fabien Quétier
Helga Rainer
Hugo Rainey
Dilys Roe
Musnanda Satar
Britaldo Silveira Soares Filho
Jeremy S. Simmonds
Malcolm Starkey
Kerry Ten Kate
Ray Victurine
Amrei Von Hase
Jessie A. Wells
Martine Maron
James E. M. Watson
Julia P. G. Jones
Joseph M. Kiesecker
Hugo M. Costa
Leon Bennun
Stephen Edwards
Hedley S. Grantham
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Laura J. Sonter
Victoria F. Griffiths
Kendall Jones
Kei Sochi
Philippe Puydarrieux
Fabien Quétier
Helga Rainer
Hugo Rainey
Dilys Roe
Musnanda Satar
Britaldo Silveira Soares Filho
Jeremy S. Simmonds
Malcolm Starkey
Kerry Ten Kate
Ray Victurine
Amrei Von Hase
Jessie A. Wells
Martine Maron
James E. M. Watson
Julia P. G. Jones
Joseph M. Kiesecker
Hugo M. Costa
Leon Bennun
Stephen Edwards
Hedley S. Grantham
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biodiversity offsets
Compensation
DINAMICA EGO
topic Biodiversity offsets
Compensation
DINAMICA EGO
Ecologia
Biodiversidade
Biodiversidade - Legislação
dc.subject.other.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Ecologia
Biodiversidade
Biodiversidade - Legislação
description Many nations use ecological compensation policies to address negative impacts of development projects and achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, failures are widely reported. We use spatial simulation models to quantify potential net impacts of alternative compensation policies on biodiversity (indicated by native vegetation) and two ecosystem services (carbon storage, sediment retention) across four case studies (in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mozambique). No policy achieves NNL of biodiversity in any case study. Two factors limit their potential success: the land available for compensation (existing vegetation to protect or cleared land to restore), and expected counterfactual biodiversity losses (unregulated vegetation clearing). Compensation also fails to slow regional biodiversity declines because policies regulate only a subset of sectors, and expanding policy scope requires more land than is available for compensation activities. Avoidance of impacts remains essential in achieving NNL goals, particularly once opportunities for compensation are exhausted.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-04-29
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-04-20T21:18:48Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-04-20T21:18:48Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52343
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2041-1723
dc.identifier.orcid.pt_BR.fl_str_mv http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3986
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-5908
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9402
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-4628
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-594X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-0353
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-3299
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-946X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-7388
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-5108
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-5789
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52343
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3986
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-5908
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9402
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-4628
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-594X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-0353
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-3299
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-946X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-7388
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-5108
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-5789
identifier_str_mv 2041-1723
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Nature Communications
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv IGC - DEPARTAMENTO DE CARTOGRAFIA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/52343/1/License.txt
https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/52343/2/localconditionsandpolicy.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv fa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22
ca976ce746c044e0497c0db430b0cc2c
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803589571904012288