Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1 http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52343 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3986 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-5908 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9402 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-4628 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-594X http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-0353 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-3299 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-946X http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-7388 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-5108 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-5789 |
Resumo: | Many nations use ecological compensation policies to address negative impacts of development projects and achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, failures are widely reported. We use spatial simulation models to quantify potential net impacts of alternative compensation policies on biodiversity (indicated by native vegetation) and two ecosystem services (carbon storage, sediment retention) across four case studies (in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mozambique). No policy achieves NNL of biodiversity in any case study. Two factors limit their potential success: the land available for compensation (existing vegetation to protect or cleared land to restore), and expected counterfactual biodiversity losses (unregulated vegetation clearing). Compensation also fails to slow regional biodiversity declines because policies regulate only a subset of sectors, and expanding policy scope requires more land than is available for compensation activities. Avoidance of impacts remains essential in achieving NNL goals, particularly once opportunities for compensation are exhausted. |
id |
UFMG_12c20c882c1e09323aaa9b329865a5ea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/52343 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2023-04-20T21:18:48Z2023-04-20T21:18:48Z2020-04-29111207211https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15861-12041-1723http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52343http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3986http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-5908http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9402http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-4628http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-594Xhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-0353http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-3299http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-946Xhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-7388http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-5108http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-5789Many nations use ecological compensation policies to address negative impacts of development projects and achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, failures are widely reported. We use spatial simulation models to quantify potential net impacts of alternative compensation policies on biodiversity (indicated by native vegetation) and two ecosystem services (carbon storage, sediment retention) across four case studies (in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mozambique). No policy achieves NNL of biodiversity in any case study. Two factors limit their potential success: the land available for compensation (existing vegetation to protect or cleared land to restore), and expected counterfactual biodiversity losses (unregulated vegetation clearing). Compensation also fails to slow regional biodiversity declines because policies regulate only a subset of sectors, and expanding policy scope requires more land than is available for compensation activities. Avoidance of impacts remains essential in achieving NNL goals, particularly once opportunities for compensation are exhausted.engUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGBrasilIGC - DEPARTAMENTO DE CARTOGRAFIANature CommunicationsEcologiaBiodiversidadeBiodiversidade - LegislaçãoBiodiversity offsetsCompensationDINAMICA EGOLocal conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goalsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15861-1#rightslinkLaura J. SonterVictoria F. GriffithsKendall JonesKei SochiPhilippe PuydarrieuxFabien QuétierHelga RainerHugo RaineyDilys RoeMusnanda SatarBritaldo Silveira Soares FilhoJeremy S. SimmondsMalcolm StarkeyKerry Ten KateRay VicturineAmrei Von HaseJessie A. WellsMartine MaronJames E. M. WatsonJulia P. G. JonesJoseph M. KieseckerHugo M. CostaLeon BennunStephen EdwardsHedley S. Granthamapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGLICENSELicense.txtLicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82042https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/52343/1/License.txtfa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22MD51ORIGINALlocalconditionsandpolicy.pdflocalconditionsandpolicy.pdfapplication/pdf613440https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/52343/2/localconditionsandpolicy.pdfca976ce746c044e0497c0db430b0cc2cMD521843/523432023-04-20 18:18:48.952oai:repositorio.ufmg.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2023-04-20T21:18:48Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals |
title |
Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals |
spellingShingle |
Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals Laura J. Sonter Biodiversity offsets Compensation DINAMICA EGO Ecologia Biodiversidade Biodiversidade - Legislação |
title_short |
Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals |
title_full |
Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals |
title_fullStr |
Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals |
title_sort |
Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals |
author |
Laura J. Sonter |
author_facet |
Laura J. Sonter Victoria F. Griffiths Kendall Jones Kei Sochi Philippe Puydarrieux Fabien Quétier Helga Rainer Hugo Rainey Dilys Roe Musnanda Satar Britaldo Silveira Soares Filho Jeremy S. Simmonds Malcolm Starkey Kerry Ten Kate Ray Victurine Amrei Von Hase Jessie A. Wells Martine Maron James E. M. Watson Julia P. G. Jones Joseph M. Kiesecker Hugo M. Costa Leon Bennun Stephen Edwards Hedley S. Grantham |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Victoria F. Griffiths Kendall Jones Kei Sochi Philippe Puydarrieux Fabien Quétier Helga Rainer Hugo Rainey Dilys Roe Musnanda Satar Britaldo Silveira Soares Filho Jeremy S. Simmonds Malcolm Starkey Kerry Ten Kate Ray Victurine Amrei Von Hase Jessie A. Wells Martine Maron James E. M. Watson Julia P. G. Jones Joseph M. Kiesecker Hugo M. Costa Leon Bennun Stephen Edwards Hedley S. Grantham |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Laura J. Sonter Victoria F. Griffiths Kendall Jones Kei Sochi Philippe Puydarrieux Fabien Quétier Helga Rainer Hugo Rainey Dilys Roe Musnanda Satar Britaldo Silveira Soares Filho Jeremy S. Simmonds Malcolm Starkey Kerry Ten Kate Ray Victurine Amrei Von Hase Jessie A. Wells Martine Maron James E. M. Watson Julia P. G. Jones Joseph M. Kiesecker Hugo M. Costa Leon Bennun Stephen Edwards Hedley S. Grantham |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biodiversity offsets Compensation DINAMICA EGO |
topic |
Biodiversity offsets Compensation DINAMICA EGO Ecologia Biodiversidade Biodiversidade - Legislação |
dc.subject.other.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Ecologia Biodiversidade Biodiversidade - Legislação |
description |
Many nations use ecological compensation policies to address negative impacts of development projects and achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, failures are widely reported. We use spatial simulation models to quantify potential net impacts of alternative compensation policies on biodiversity (indicated by native vegetation) and two ecosystem services (carbon storage, sediment retention) across four case studies (in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mozambique). No policy achieves NNL of biodiversity in any case study. Two factors limit their potential success: the land available for compensation (existing vegetation to protect or cleared land to restore), and expected counterfactual biodiversity losses (unregulated vegetation clearing). Compensation also fails to slow regional biodiversity declines because policies regulate only a subset of sectors, and expanding policy scope requires more land than is available for compensation activities. Avoidance of impacts remains essential in achieving NNL goals, particularly once opportunities for compensation are exhausted. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-29 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-04-20T21:18:48Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2023-04-20T21:18:48Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52343 |
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2041-1723 |
dc.identifier.orcid.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3986 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-5908 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9402 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-4628 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-594X http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-0353 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-3299 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-946X http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-7388 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-5108 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-5789 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1 http://hdl.handle.net/1843/52343 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-3986 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-5908 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-1984 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5199-3335 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-9402 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-4628 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6832-594X http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3767-0353 http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-3299 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-946X http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-7388 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3555-5108 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5563-5789 |
identifier_str_mv |
2041-1723 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Nature Communications |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFMG |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
IGC - DEPARTAMENTO DE CARTOGRAFIA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/52343/1/License.txt https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/52343/2/localconditionsandpolicy.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
fa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22 ca976ce746c044e0497c0db430b0cc2c |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1803589571904012288 |