The argument from authority in law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alexandre Travessoni Gomes Trivisonno
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp29
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/42208
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-9153-968X
Resumo: This essay investigates the role of the argument from authority in Law. It begins with the way (both formal and informal) Logic approaches it, trying to identify its “correct use”, as well as its legitimacy in everyday and scientific discourses, by separating logical questions from material questions. Then it investigates the use of the argument from authority in Law, distinguishing its two different forms: arguments based on authoritative material (statutes and precedents) as arguments from authority (authoritative or normative arguments) and arguments from authority provided by legal scholars (scientific or intellectual legal arguments from authority). As a conclusion, the essay provides an identification of the core element of both kinds of arguments from authority in Law, which is the figure of the presumption.
id UFMG_3660cebc689f7602c7938bfa8079fbc7
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/42208
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2022-06-03T12:13:27Z2022-06-03T12:13:27Z2017Especial - 2º Conference Brazil-Italy2957https://doi.org/10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp291984-1841http://hdl.handle.net/1843/42208https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-9153-968XThis essay investigates the role of the argument from authority in Law. It begins with the way (both formal and informal) Logic approaches it, trying to identify its “correct use”, as well as its legitimacy in everyday and scientific discourses, by separating logical questions from material questions. Then it investigates the use of the argument from authority in Law, distinguishing its two different forms: arguments based on authoritative material (statutes and precedents) as arguments from authority (authoritative or normative arguments) and arguments from authority provided by legal scholars (scientific or intellectual legal arguments from authority). As a conclusion, the essay provides an identification of the core element of both kinds of arguments from authority in Law, which is the figure of the presumption.Este ensaio investiga o papel do argumento de autoridade no Direito. Começa analisando o modo como a lógica (formal e informal) o aborda, tentando identificar seu “uso correto”, bem como sua legitimidade nos discursos cotidianos e científicos, separando questões lógicas de questões materiais. Em seguida, investiga o uso do argumento de autoridade no Direito, distinguindo duas formas essenciais: argumentos baseados na autoridade da lei e dos precedentes como argumentos de autoridade (argumentos autoritativos ou normativos) e argumentos de autoridade fornecidos por juristas (argumentos jurídicos científicos ou argumentos de autoridade intelectual). Como conclusão, o ensaio fornece uma identificação do elemento central de ambos os tipos de argumentos de autoridade no Direito, que é a figura da presunção.engUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGBrasilDIR - DEPARTAMENTO DE DIREITO DO TRABALHO E INTRODUÇÃO AO ESTUDO DO DIREITORevista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisDireito - FilosofiaArgumentação jurídicaLógicaArgument from authorityAppeal to expert opinionFallaciesLawFormal logicInformal logicLegal argumentationThe argument from authority in lawO argumento de autoridade no direitoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://www.direito.ufmg.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1824Alexandre Travessoni Gomes Trivisonnoapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGLICENSELicense.txtLicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82042https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/42208/1/License.txtfa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22MD51ORIGINALThe argument from authority in law.pdfThe argument from authority in law.pdfapplication/pdf140552https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/42208/2/The%20argument%20from%20authority%20in%20law.pdf6bd2869f7528006a73b3ffe29fa4808aMD521843/422082022-07-12 16:29:46.488oai:repositorio.ufmg.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2022-07-12T19:29:46Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv The argument from authority in law
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv O argumento de autoridade no direito
title The argument from authority in law
spellingShingle The argument from authority in law
Alexandre Travessoni Gomes Trivisonno
Argument from authority
Appeal to expert opinion
Fallacies
Law
Formal logic
Informal logic
Legal argumentation
Direito - Filosofia
Argumentação jurídica
Lógica
title_short The argument from authority in law
title_full The argument from authority in law
title_fullStr The argument from authority in law
title_full_unstemmed The argument from authority in law
title_sort The argument from authority in law
author Alexandre Travessoni Gomes Trivisonno
author_facet Alexandre Travessoni Gomes Trivisonno
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alexandre Travessoni Gomes Trivisonno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Argument from authority
Appeal to expert opinion
Fallacies
Law
Formal logic
Informal logic
Legal argumentation
topic Argument from authority
Appeal to expert opinion
Fallacies
Law
Formal logic
Informal logic
Legal argumentation
Direito - Filosofia
Argumentação jurídica
Lógica
dc.subject.other.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Direito - Filosofia
Argumentação jurídica
Lógica
description This essay investigates the role of the argument from authority in Law. It begins with the way (both formal and informal) Logic approaches it, trying to identify its “correct use”, as well as its legitimacy in everyday and scientific discourses, by separating logical questions from material questions. Then it investigates the use of the argument from authority in Law, distinguishing its two different forms: arguments based on authoritative material (statutes and precedents) as arguments from authority (authoritative or normative arguments) and arguments from authority provided by legal scholars (scientific or intellectual legal arguments from authority). As a conclusion, the essay provides an identification of the core element of both kinds of arguments from authority in Law, which is the figure of the presumption.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-06-03T12:13:27Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-06-03T12:13:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1843/42208
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp29
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1984-1841
dc.identifier.orcid.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-9153-968X
url https://doi.org/10.12818/P.0304-2340.2017vBIp29
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/42208
https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-9153-968X
identifier_str_mv 1984-1841
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv DIR - DEPARTAMENTO DE DIREITO DO TRABALHO E INTRODUÇÃO AO ESTUDO DO DIREITO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/42208/1/License.txt
https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/42208/2/The%20argument%20from%20authority%20in%20law.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv fa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22
6bd2869f7528006a73b3ffe29fa4808a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803589458582306816

Registros relacionados