Effects of two different topographic approaches for combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves, guided by ultrasound and neurostimulation

• Autor(a) principal: Marcos Paulo Antunes de Lima
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Renata Andrade Silva, Patrícia de Castro Duarte, Sérgio da Silva Rocha Júnior, Stephanie Elise Muniz Tavares Branco, Cahuê Francisco Rosa Paz, Pablo Ezequiel Otero, Rafael Resende Faleiros, Suzane Lilian Beier
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
• Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2023.100315; http://hdl.handle.net/1843/76876
• topic: Locoregional anaesthesia; Perineural; Regional anaesthesia; Ropivacaine; Medicina Veterinária; Bovinos

To evaluate the sensory and motor effects promoted by a combined sciatic and femoral nerve block in calves using two approaches. Six calves were used, in a crossover study. Ultrasound combined with neurostimulation, was used to perform the following block combinations: the proximal approach (PA), which consisted of the association of the parasacral approach (sciatic nerve block) and ventral to the ilium approach (femoral nerve block); distal approach (DA) consisted of the association of a lateral approach to the pelvic limb approach (sciatic nerve block), and an inguinal approach, underneath the femoral trigone (femoral nerve block). Pressure algometry and motor function of the limb where evaluated. Mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) increase, and ataxia duration means were 9.5 ± 0.7 kg and 10.4 ± 3.9 hr for PA and 10.4 ± 3.9 kg and 12.7 ± 1.9 hr for DA, respectively with no significant difference. There was no significant difference between MNT elevation time andthe duration of ataxia using the same approach. The DA treatment showed significant MNT elevation in 72% of the tested regions, while the PA treatment showed an elevation in 100% regions tested. Topographic approaches closer to where the spinal nerves emerge produced a larger desensitised area.