How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Letícia Duarte de Freitas
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Jener Fernando Leite de Moraes, Adriana Monteiro da Costa, Letícia Lopes Martins, Bruno Montoani Silva, Junior Cesar Avanzi, Alexandre Uezu
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3030042
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/59766
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0299-3005
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-8987
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-3340
Resumo: Water resources are paramount for the maintenance of the Earth’s system equilibrium; however, they face various threats and need increased conservation and better management. To restore water resources, nature-based solutions can be applied. Nevertheless, it is unclear which solution promotes greater water supply resilience: restoring riparian vegetation, improving management practices in key areas for water recharge, or both? In addition, how significant are these results in the face of climate change effects? To answer this, we used the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model to simulate and compare four different land use scenarios under three climate conditions (i.e., observed climate and two of the IPCC’s future climate projections). Focusing on key areas contributed more to increasing water supply resilience than forest restoration. Applying both solutions, however, yielded the greatest increases in resilience and groundwater recharge and the greatest decreases in surface runoff and sediment loads. None of the solutions caused a significant difference in streamflow and water yield. Furthermore, according to both of the IPCC climate projections evaluated, by the end of this century, the average annual streamflow will be lower than the historical mean for the region. Climate adaptation strategies alone will be insufficient to ensure future water access, highlighting the need for implementing drastic mitigation actions.
id UFMG_57ce793d4890abce1acc15d8b30c007a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/59766
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2023-10-19T19:59:41Z2023-10-19T19:59:41Z202233748767https://doi.org/10.3390/earth30300422673-4834http://hdl.handle.net/1843/59766https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0299-3005https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-8987https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-3340Water resources are paramount for the maintenance of the Earth’s system equilibrium; however, they face various threats and need increased conservation and better management. To restore water resources, nature-based solutions can be applied. Nevertheless, it is unclear which solution promotes greater water supply resilience: restoring riparian vegetation, improving management practices in key areas for water recharge, or both? In addition, how significant are these results in the face of climate change effects? To answer this, we used the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model to simulate and compare four different land use scenarios under three climate conditions (i.e., observed climate and two of the IPCC’s future climate projections). Focusing on key areas contributed more to increasing water supply resilience than forest restoration. Applying both solutions, however, yielded the greatest increases in resilience and groundwater recharge and the greatest decreases in surface runoff and sediment loads. None of the solutions caused a significant difference in streamflow and water yield. Furthermore, according to both of the IPCC climate projections evaluated, by the end of this century, the average annual streamflow will be lower than the historical mean for the region. Climate adaptation strategies alone will be insufficient to ensure future water access, highlighting the need for implementing drastic mitigation actions.Os recursos hídricos são fundamentais para a manutenção do equilíbrio do sistema terrestre; no entanto, enfrentam várias ameaças e necessitam de maior conservação e melhor gestão. Para restaurar os recursos hídricos, podem ser aplicadas soluções baseadas na natureza. No entanto, não é claro qual solução promove uma maior resiliência do abastecimento de água: restaurar a vegetação ribeirinha, melhorar as práticas de gestão em áreas-chave para a recarga de água, ou ambas? Além disso, quão significativos são estes resultados face aos efeitos das alterações climáticas? Para responder a isto, utilizámos o modelo SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) para simular e comparar quatro cenários diferentes de uso do solo sob três condições climáticas (ou seja, o clima observado e duas das projeções climáticas futuras do IPCC). A concentração em áreas-chave contribuiu mais para aumentar a resiliência do abastecimento de água do que a restauração florestal. A aplicação de ambas as soluções, no entanto, produziu os maiores aumentos na resiliência e na recarga das águas subterrâneas e as maiores reduções no escoamento superficial e nas cargas de sedimentos. Nenhuma das soluções causou diferença significativa na vazão e na produção de água. Além disso, de acordo com ambas as projeções climáticas do IPCC avaliadas, até ao final deste século, o caudal médio anual será inferior à média histórica para a região. As estratégias de adaptação climática por si só serão insuficientes para garantir o acesso futuro à água, destacando a necessidade de implementar ações drásticas de mitigação.CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFAPESP - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloOutra AgênciaporUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGBrasilIGC - DEPARTAMENTO DE GEOGRAFIAEarthMudança climáticaUsos do soloMeio ambienteAbastecimento de águaRecursos hídricosClimate changeLand useSWATCover changeNature-based solutionsConservative use potentialWater supplyCantareira systemHow far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?Até que ponto as soluções naturais podem aumentar a resiliência do abastecimento de água às mudanças climáticas em uma das mais importantes bacias hidrográficas brasileiras?info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://www.mdpi.com/2673-4834/3/3/42Letícia Duarte de FreitasJener Fernando Leite de MoraesAdriana Monteiro da CostaLetícia Lopes MartinsBruno Montoani SilvaJunior Cesar AvanziAlexandre Uezuapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGLICENSELicense.txtLicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82042https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/59766/1/License.txtfa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22MD51ORIGINALHow far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds_.pdfHow far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds_.pdfapplication/pdf6513050https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/59766/2/How%20far%20can%20nature-based%20solutions%20increase%20water%20supply%20resilience%20to%20climate%20change%20in%20one%20of%20the%20most%20important%20brazilian%20watersheds_.pdf067af05634fe581e3bd61d91d0ef4a5aMD521843/597662023-10-19 16:59:42.025oai:repositorio.ufmg.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2023-10-19T19:59:42Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Até que ponto as soluções naturais podem aumentar a resiliência do abastecimento de água às mudanças climáticas em uma das mais importantes bacias hidrográficas brasileiras?
title How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?
spellingShingle How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?
Letícia Duarte de Freitas
Climate change
Land use
SWAT
Cover change
Nature-based solutions
Conservative use potential
Water supply
Cantareira system
Mudança climática
Usos do solo
Meio ambiente
Abastecimento de água
Recursos hídricos
title_short How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?
title_full How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?
title_fullStr How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?
title_full_unstemmed How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?
title_sort How far can nature-based solutions increase water supply resilience to climate change in one of the most important brazilian watersheds?
author Letícia Duarte de Freitas
author_facet Letícia Duarte de Freitas
Jener Fernando Leite de Moraes
Adriana Monteiro da Costa
Letícia Lopes Martins
Bruno Montoani Silva
Junior Cesar Avanzi
Alexandre Uezu
author_role author
author2 Jener Fernando Leite de Moraes
Adriana Monteiro da Costa
Letícia Lopes Martins
Bruno Montoani Silva
Junior Cesar Avanzi
Alexandre Uezu
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Letícia Duarte de Freitas
Jener Fernando Leite de Moraes
Adriana Monteiro da Costa
Letícia Lopes Martins
Bruno Montoani Silva
Junior Cesar Avanzi
Alexandre Uezu
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Climate change
Land use
SWAT
Cover change
Nature-based solutions
Conservative use potential
Water supply
Cantareira system
topic Climate change
Land use
SWAT
Cover change
Nature-based solutions
Conservative use potential
Water supply
Cantareira system
Mudança climática
Usos do solo
Meio ambiente
Abastecimento de água
Recursos hídricos
dc.subject.other.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Mudança climática
Usos do solo
Meio ambiente
Abastecimento de água
Recursos hídricos
description Water resources are paramount for the maintenance of the Earth’s system equilibrium; however, they face various threats and need increased conservation and better management. To restore water resources, nature-based solutions can be applied. Nevertheless, it is unclear which solution promotes greater water supply resilience: restoring riparian vegetation, improving management practices in key areas for water recharge, or both? In addition, how significant are these results in the face of climate change effects? To answer this, we used the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model to simulate and compare four different land use scenarios under three climate conditions (i.e., observed climate and two of the IPCC’s future climate projections). Focusing on key areas contributed more to increasing water supply resilience than forest restoration. Applying both solutions, however, yielded the greatest increases in resilience and groundwater recharge and the greatest decreases in surface runoff and sediment loads. None of the solutions caused a significant difference in streamflow and water yield. Furthermore, according to both of the IPCC climate projections evaluated, by the end of this century, the average annual streamflow will be lower than the historical mean for the region. Climate adaptation strategies alone will be insufficient to ensure future water access, highlighting the need for implementing drastic mitigation actions.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-10-19T19:59:41Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-10-19T19:59:41Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1843/59766
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3030042
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2673-4834
dc.identifier.orcid.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0299-3005
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-8987
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-3340
url https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3030042
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/59766
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0299-3005
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-8987
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3972-3340
identifier_str_mv 2673-4834
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Earth
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv IGC - DEPARTAMENTO DE GEOGRAFIA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/59766/1/License.txt
https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/59766/2/How%20far%20can%20nature-based%20solutions%20increase%20water%20supply%20resilience%20to%20climate%20change%20in%20one%20of%20the%20most%20important%20brazilian%20watersheds_.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv fa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22
067af05634fe581e3bd61d91d0ef4a5a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803589224721547264