Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estética

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arthur Eduardo Grupillo Chagas
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-967FUA
Resumo: The critique of reason is as old as herself, because reason is just that: the ability to put things on hold, to snatch away from them the obviousness, and to require them to plea, as required of an owner your title. Around the middle of the twentieth century, this criticism seems to have exhausted the possbilities of renewal, what stimulated thinkers such as Jürgen Habermas to formulate a broadened or enriched concept of reason, which would essentially have two advantages over the outdated model. The first one concerns the aptitude of this renewed figure of reason to include the other of the subject-centered reason, namely the aesthetic experience. The second one focuses on how this inclusion is accomplished by an incorporation of reason into language, therefore through a linguistification of aesthetic experience. The present thesis proposes to investigate how this conceptual strategy, although justified, comes up against limits, which, striclty speaking, should notbe imputed to rationality itself. Communicative reason should therefore not be susceptible to an autophagic critique, something like a negative dialectics. However, insofar asit must take into account the cognitive potential of these limits imposed by a world-disclosing language, it internalizes dissonant normative assumptions. Since the experience with art offersthe clearest example of this potencial, while raising a specific rational claim, it has the methodological prerogative to allow a critique of communicative reason which does not become self-referential, but which has been put from a problem: the problem of aesthetics.
id UFMG_60585ac0e7b0a388e92c4eebc5fb5d26
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/BUOS-967FUA
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estéticaHeideggerAbertura de mundoHabermasRazão comunicativaEstéticaHabermas, Jurgen, 1929-FilosofiaHeidegger, Martin, 1889-1976EstéticaThe critique of reason is as old as herself, because reason is just that: the ability to put things on hold, to snatch away from them the obviousness, and to require them to plea, as required of an owner your title. Around the middle of the twentieth century, this criticism seems to have exhausted the possbilities of renewal, what stimulated thinkers such as Jürgen Habermas to formulate a broadened or enriched concept of reason, which would essentially have two advantages over the outdated model. The first one concerns the aptitude of this renewed figure of reason to include the other of the subject-centered reason, namely the aesthetic experience. The second one focuses on how this inclusion is accomplished by an incorporation of reason into language, therefore through a linguistification of aesthetic experience. The present thesis proposes to investigate how this conceptual strategy, although justified, comes up against limits, which, striclty speaking, should notbe imputed to rationality itself. Communicative reason should therefore not be susceptible to an autophagic critique, something like a negative dialectics. However, insofar asit must take into account the cognitive potential of these limits imposed by a world-disclosing language, it internalizes dissonant normative assumptions. Since the experience with art offersthe clearest example of this potencial, while raising a specific rational claim, it has the methodological prerogative to allow a critique of communicative reason which does not become self-referential, but which has been put from a problem: the problem of aesthetics.A crítica da razão é tão antiga quanto ela mesma, pois a razão não passa disso: a capacidade de pôr as coisas em suspenso, subtrair-lhes a obviedade, exigir-lhes fundamento, como se exige de um proprietário o seu título de propriedade. Em torno da metade do século XX, esta crítica parece ter esgotado as possibilidades de serenovar, o que estimulou pensadores como Jürgen Habermas à formulação de um conceito ampliado ou enriquecido de razão, que teria essencialmente duas vantagens sobre o modelo ultrapassado. A primeira diz respeito à aptidão desta figura renovada da razão para incluir o outro excluído da razão centrada na subjetividade, a saber, a experiência estética. A segunda incide sobre o modo como esta inclusão é realizada a partir de uma incorporação da razão à linguagem, conseqüentemente através de uma lingüistificação da experiência estética. A presente tese propõe-se a investigar como esta estratégia conceitual, embora justificada, esbarra em limites que, a rigor, não deveriam ser imputados à própria racionalidade. Arazão comunicativa, portanto, não deveria ser passível de uma crítica autofágica, algo assim como uma dialética negativa. Porém, na medida em que ela precisa levar em consideração o potencial cognitivo destes limites impostos pela linguagem que abre o mundo, ela interioriza pressupostos normativos dissonantes consigo mesma. Uma vez que a experiência coma arte oferece o exemplo mais claro deste potencial, sem deixar de levantar uma pretensão racional específica, ela tem a prerrogativa metodológica de permitir uma crítica à razão comunicativa que não se torna auto-referente, mas que se coloca a partir de um problema: o problema da estética.Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGVirginia de Araujo FigueiredoEduardo Soares Neves SilvaGiorgia CecchinatoRicardo José Corrêa BarbosaAmós NascimentoArthur Eduardo Grupillo Chagas2019-08-10T11:44:03Z2019-08-10T11:44:03Z2012-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-967FUAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2019-11-14T11:34:17Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/BUOS-967FUARepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2019-11-14T11:34:17Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estética
title Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estética
spellingShingle Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estética
Arthur Eduardo Grupillo Chagas
Heidegger
Abertura de mundo
Habermas
Razão comunicativa
Estética
Habermas, Jurgen, 1929-
Filosofia
Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976
Estética
title_short Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estética
title_full Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estética
title_fullStr Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estética
title_full_unstemmed Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estética
title_sort Limites e dissonâncias da razão comunicativa: uma crítica a partir do Problema da estética
author Arthur Eduardo Grupillo Chagas
author_facet Arthur Eduardo Grupillo Chagas
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Virginia de Araujo Figueiredo
Eduardo Soares Neves Silva
Giorgia Cecchinato
Ricardo José Corrêa Barbosa
Amós Nascimento
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arthur Eduardo Grupillo Chagas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Heidegger
Abertura de mundo
Habermas
Razão comunicativa
Estética
Habermas, Jurgen, 1929-
Filosofia
Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976
Estética
topic Heidegger
Abertura de mundo
Habermas
Razão comunicativa
Estética
Habermas, Jurgen, 1929-
Filosofia
Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976
Estética
description The critique of reason is as old as herself, because reason is just that: the ability to put things on hold, to snatch away from them the obviousness, and to require them to plea, as required of an owner your title. Around the middle of the twentieth century, this criticism seems to have exhausted the possbilities of renewal, what stimulated thinkers such as Jürgen Habermas to formulate a broadened or enriched concept of reason, which would essentially have two advantages over the outdated model. The first one concerns the aptitude of this renewed figure of reason to include the other of the subject-centered reason, namely the aesthetic experience. The second one focuses on how this inclusion is accomplished by an incorporation of reason into language, therefore through a linguistification of aesthetic experience. The present thesis proposes to investigate how this conceptual strategy, although justified, comes up against limits, which, striclty speaking, should notbe imputed to rationality itself. Communicative reason should therefore not be susceptible to an autophagic critique, something like a negative dialectics. However, insofar asit must take into account the cognitive potential of these limits imposed by a world-disclosing language, it internalizes dissonant normative assumptions. Since the experience with art offersthe clearest example of this potencial, while raising a specific rational claim, it has the methodological prerogative to allow a critique of communicative reason which does not become self-referential, but which has been put from a problem: the problem of aesthetics.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-06-25
2019-08-10T11:44:03Z
2019-08-10T11:44:03Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-967FUA
url http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUOS-967FUA
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
UFMG
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufmg.br
_version_ 1816829907124092928