Comparação das respostas do VEMP cervical e ocular em indivíduos com e sem doenças otoneurológicas

• Autor(a) principal: Marlon Bruno Nunes Ribeiro
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Outros Autores: Patrícia Cotta Mancini
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
• Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.23925/2176-2724.2020v32i3p406-413; http://hdl.handle.net/1843/56669; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-5771; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6535-1413
• topic: Orelha interna; Equilíbrio Postural; Tontura; Potencial evocado motor; Sáculo e Utrículo; Fonoaudiologia; Orelha interna; Equilíbrio Postural; Tontura; Potencial Evocado Motor; Sáculo e Utrículo

Introduction: The vestibular assessment is traditionally carried out with the caloric test to evaluate the labyrinth in individuals with dizziness. However, this examination does not evaluate the entire vestibular pathway. The vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) are a quick test, considered a choice method to assess the otolith organs and the vestibular nerve. Purpose: To analyze the responses of the cervical (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) examinations in individuals with vestibular diseases and compare them with the results obtained in individuals of the same age group and gender without previous and current complaints of dizziness. Methods: In this observational, cross-sectional, analytical study, the participants were divided into two groups: the dizziness group (DG), composed of individuals with several vestibular diseases, and the group without complaints of dizziness (CG). Both groups underwent meatoscopy, and cervical and ocular VEMP. Results: The sample comprised 45 individuals aged 23 to 68 years – 27 individuals in the CG and 18 in the DG. In the cVEMP exam, the latencies, amplitudes, asymmetry index, and the corrected asymmetry index were the same in the GT when compared to the GC. In the cVEMP examination, the latencies, amplitudes, asymmetry index, and corrected asymmetry index were equal in the DG when compared with the CG. In the oVEMP examination, the left amplitude was statistically greater and the N10 latency, smaller in the DG when compared with the CG. Of the diseases in the DG, individuals with superior canal dehiscence had higher left amplitude values, which may have interfered with the results. Conclusion: There were no differences in cVEMP responses between the groups in this study. An increase in the left amplitude and the lower value in the right N10 latency were found in the DG in the analysis of the oVEMP examination. It is believed that the heterogeneity of vestibular diseases in the DG and the small number of participants in both groups have contributed to this outcome.