Comparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cintia Ferreira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Maristela Silveira Palhares, Ubiratan Pereira de Melo, Helio Chiarini-Garcia, Renata de Pino Albuquerque Maranhão, Valentim Arabicano Gheller, Fabiola de Oliveira Paes Leme
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFMG
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm004521
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/67539
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-1580
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-2720
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-7868
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-672X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1983-3104
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4013-0147
Resumo: To determine the effect of the inclusion method on the histomorphometric evaluation of the gastrointestinal mucosa of horses, jejunum samples were collected using flank laparotomy. Sixteen mixed breed healthy adult horses, including four males and 12 females, aged 4–14 years with an average body weight of 248.40 ± 2.28 kg, were used. Jejunal biopsies were collected and analyzed by light microscopy using two methods: group 1 comprised biopsies fixed using 10% neutral formalin and embedded in paraffin; biopsies in group 2 were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2, followed by inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)-based plastic resin. Intestinal villi height, crypt depth, glandular mucosa thickness, total mucosal thickness, and villus/crypt ratio were then evaluated. For all the variables studied, with exception of the villus/crypt ratio, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between samples in groups 1 and 2. Processing samples for embedding in plastic resin was quicker and easier to perform compared to that for paraffin embedding. In addition, the epithelial lining of tissues in group 2 showed better resolution for conducting cytological studies under a light microscope. The difference between the studied variables can be attributed to tissue retraction caused by conventional processing for inclusion in paraffin. Therefore, the method of inclusion in GMA described in the present study appears to be a more reliable choice for morphometric evaluation of the intestinal mucosa of horses.
id UFMG_dae71374456d1bd98332fe86009538c6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/67539
network_acronym_str UFMG
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
repository_id_str
spelling 2024-04-22T20:57:22Z2024-04-22T20:57:22Z202244https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm0045212527-2179http://hdl.handle.net/1843/67539http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-1580http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-2720https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-7868http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-672Xhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-1983-3104http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4013-0147To determine the effect of the inclusion method on the histomorphometric evaluation of the gastrointestinal mucosa of horses, jejunum samples were collected using flank laparotomy. Sixteen mixed breed healthy adult horses, including four males and 12 females, aged 4–14 years with an average body weight of 248.40 ± 2.28 kg, were used. Jejunal biopsies were collected and analyzed by light microscopy using two methods: group 1 comprised biopsies fixed using 10% neutral formalin and embedded in paraffin; biopsies in group 2 were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2, followed by inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)-based plastic resin. Intestinal villi height, crypt depth, glandular mucosa thickness, total mucosal thickness, and villus/crypt ratio were then evaluated. For all the variables studied, with exception of the villus/crypt ratio, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between samples in groups 1 and 2. Processing samples for embedding in plastic resin was quicker and easier to perform compared to that for paraffin embedding. In addition, the epithelial lining of tissues in group 2 showed better resolution for conducting cytological studies under a light microscope. The difference between the studied variables can be attributed to tissue retraction caused by conventional processing for inclusion in paraffin. Therefore, the method of inclusion in GMA described in the present study appears to be a more reliable choice for morphometric evaluation of the intestinal mucosa of horses.Para determinar o efeito do método de inclusão sobre a avaliação histomorfométrica da mucosa gastrointestinal de equinos foram coletadas amostras do jejuno por laparotomia pelo flanco. Foram utilizados 16 equinos adultos hígidos, sem raça definida, de ambos os sexos, quatro machos e 12 fêmeas, com idade variando entre quatro e 14 anos, e peso corporal médio de 248,40 + 2,28kg. Amostras do jejuno foram coletadas e processadas para biopsia em microscopia de luz sob dois métodos: grupo 1 - fixação em formalina neutra tamponada a 10% e inclusão em parafina, grupo 2 - fixação em glutaraldeído 2,5% em tampão fosfato 0,1M pH 7,2, seguido de inclusão em resina plástica à base de glicol metacrilato. Os seguintes parâmetros foram avaliados: altura das vilosidades intestinais, profundidade de cripta, espessura da mucosa glandular, espessura total da mucosa e relação vilo/cripta. Para todas as variáveis estudadas, exceto relação vilo/cripta, foi encontrada diferença significativa (p<0,05) entre os dois métodos. O processamento para inclusão em resina plástica foi rápido e de fácil execução quando comparado à inclusão em parafina. Além disso, o epitélio de revestimento apresentou melhor resolução das células para estudo histológico ao microscópio de luz. A diferença entre as variáveis pode ser atribuída a retração do tecido provocada pelo processamento convencional por inclusão em parafina. Portanto, o método de inclusão em GMA mostrou-se, no presente estudo, uma escolha mais fidedigna para as avaliações morfométricas da mucosa intestinal de equinos.engUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisUFMGBrasilVET - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA E CIRURGIABrazilian Journal of Veterinary MedicineBiópsiaEquinoMucosa intestinalIntestino delgadoBiopsyEquineIntestinal mucosaSmall intestineVilli heightComparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horsesComparação entre as técnicas de inclusão em resina plástica à base de glicol metacrilato (GMA) e inclusão em parafina para avaliação da morfometria intestinal em equinosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://bjvm.org.br/BJVM/article/view/1226Cintia FerreiraMaristela Silveira PalharesUbiratan Pereira de MeloHelio Chiarini-GarciaRenata de Pino Albuquerque MaranhãoValentim Arabicano GhellerFabiola de Oliveira Paes Lemeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMGLICENSELicense.txtLicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82042https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/67539/1/License.txtfa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22MD51ORIGINALComparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses.pdfComparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses.pdfapplication/pdf514987https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/67539/2/Comparison%20between%20the%20techniques%20of%20inclusion%20in%20glycol%20methacrylate%20%28GMA%29-%20based%20plastic%20resin%20and%20paraffin%20for%20evaluation%20intestinal%20morphometry%20in%20horses.pdf4d774a88e9496a674c2eb3d81277fe61MD521843/675392024-04-22 17:57:23.392oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/67539TElDRU7vv71BIERFIERJU1RSSUJVSe+/ve+/vU8gTu+/vU8tRVhDTFVTSVZBIERPIFJFUE9TSVTvv71SSU8gSU5TVElUVUNJT05BTCBEQSBVRk1HCiAKCkNvbSBhIGFwcmVzZW50Ye+/ve+/vW8gZGVzdGEgbGljZW7vv71hLCB2b2Pvv70gKG8gYXV0b3IgKGVzKSBvdSBvIHRpdHVsYXIgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGRlIGF1dG9yKSBjb25jZWRlIGFvIFJlcG9zaXTvv71yaW8gSW5zdGl0dWNpb25hbCBkYSBVRk1HIChSSS1VRk1HKSBvIGRpcmVpdG8gbu+/vW8gZXhjbHVzaXZvIGUgaXJyZXZvZ++/vXZlbCBkZSByZXByb2R1emlyIGUvb3UgZGlzdHJpYnVpciBhIHN1YSBwdWJsaWNh77+977+9byAoaW5jbHVpbmRvIG8gcmVzdW1vKSBwb3IgdG9kbyBvIG11bmRvIG5vIGZvcm1hdG8gaW1wcmVzc28gZSBlbGV0cu+/vW5pY28gZSBlbSBxdWFscXVlciBtZWlvLCBpbmNsdWluZG8gb3MgZm9ybWF0b3Mg77+9dWRpbyBvdSB277+9ZGVvLgoKVm9j77+9IGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIGNvbmhlY2UgYSBwb2zvv710aWNhIGRlIGNvcHlyaWdodCBkYSBlZGl0b3JhIGRvIHNldSBkb2N1bWVudG8gZSBxdWUgY29uaGVjZSBlIGFjZWl0YSBhcyBEaXJldHJpemVzIGRvIFJJLVVGTUcuCgpWb2Pvv70gY29uY29yZGEgcXVlIG8gUmVwb3NpdO+/vXJpbyBJbnN0aXR1Y2lvbmFsIGRhIFVGTUcgcG9kZSwgc2VtIGFsdGVyYXIgbyBjb250Ze+/vWRvLCB0cmFuc3BvciBhIHN1YSBwdWJsaWNh77+977+9byBwYXJhIHF1YWxxdWVyIG1laW8gb3UgZm9ybWF0byBwYXJhIGZpbnMgZGUgcHJlc2VydmHvv73vv71vLgoKVm9j77+9IHRhbWLvv71tIGNvbmNvcmRhIHF1ZSBvIFJlcG9zaXTvv71yaW8gSW5zdGl0dWNpb25hbCBkYSBVRk1HIHBvZGUgbWFudGVyIG1haXMgZGUgdW1hIGPvv71waWEgZGUgc3VhIHB1YmxpY2Hvv73vv71vIHBhcmEgZmlucyBkZSBzZWd1cmFu77+9YSwgYmFjay11cCBlIHByZXNlcnZh77+977+9by4KClZvY++/vSBkZWNsYXJhIHF1ZSBhIHN1YSBwdWJsaWNh77+977+9byDvv70gb3JpZ2luYWwgZSBxdWUgdm9j77+9IHRlbSBvIHBvZGVyIGRlIGNvbmNlZGVyIG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGNvbnRpZG9zIG5lc3RhIGxpY2Vu77+9YS4gVm9j77+9IHRhbWLvv71tIGRlY2xhcmEgcXVlIG8gZGVw77+9c2l0byBkZSBzdWEgcHVibGljYe+/ve+/vW8gbu+/vW8sIHF1ZSBzZWphIGRlIHNldSBjb25oZWNpbWVudG8sIGluZnJpbmdlIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzIGRlIG5pbmd177+9bS4KCkNhc28gYSBzdWEgcHVibGljYe+/ve+/vW8gY29udGVuaGEgbWF0ZXJpYWwgcXVlIHZvY++/vSBu77+9byBwb3NzdWkgYSB0aXR1bGFyaWRhZGUgZG9zIGRpcmVpdG9zIGF1dG9yYWlzLCB2b2Pvv70gZGVjbGFyYSBxdWUgb2J0ZXZlIGEgcGVybWlzc++/vW8gaXJyZXN0cml0YSBkbyBkZXRlbnRvciBkb3MgZGlyZWl0b3MgYXV0b3JhaXMgcGFyYSBjb25jZWRlciBhbyBSZXBvc2l077+9cmlvIEluc3RpdHVjaW9uYWwgZGEgVUZNRyBvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhcHJlc2VudGFkb3MgbmVzdGEgbGljZW7vv71hLCBlIHF1ZSBlc3NlIG1hdGVyaWFsIGRlIHByb3ByaWVkYWRlIGRlIHRlcmNlaXJvcyBlc3Tvv70gY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBpZGVudGlmaWNhZG8gZSByZWNvbmhlY2lkbyBubyB0ZXh0byBvdSBubyBjb250Ze+/vWRvIGRhIHB1YmxpY2Hvv73vv71vIG9yYSBkZXBvc2l0YWRhLgoKQ0FTTyBBIFBVQkxJQ0Hvv73vv71PIE9SQSBERVBPU0lUQURBIFRFTkhBIFNJRE8gUkVTVUxUQURPIERFIFVNIFBBVFJPQ++/vU5JTyBPVSBBUE9JTyBERSBVTUEgQUfvv71OQ0lBIERFIEZPTUVOVE8gT1UgT1VUUk8gT1JHQU5JU01PLCBWT0Pvv70gREVDTEFSQSBRVUUgUkVTUEVJVE9VIFRPRE9TIEUgUVVBSVNRVUVSIERJUkVJVE9TIERFIFJFVklT77+9TyBDT01PIFRBTULvv71NIEFTIERFTUFJUyBPQlJJR0Hvv73vv71FUyBFWElHSURBUyBQT1IgQ09OVFJBVE8gT1UgQUNPUkRPLgoKTyBSZXBvc2l077+9cmlvIEluc3RpdHVjaW9uYWwgZGEgVUZNRyBzZSBjb21wcm9tZXRlIGEgaWRlbnRpZmljYXIgY2xhcmFtZW50ZSBvIHNldSBub21lKHMpIG91IG8ocykgbm9tZXMocykgZG8ocykgZGV0ZW50b3IoZXMpIGRvcyBkaXJlaXRvcyBhdXRvcmFpcyBkYSBwdWJsaWNh77+977+9bywgZSBu77+9byBmYXLvv70gcXVhbHF1ZXIgYWx0ZXJh77+977+9bywgYWzvv71tIGRhcXVlbGFzIGNvbmNlZGlkYXMgcG9yIGVzdGEgbGljZW7vv71hLgo=Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oaiopendoar:2024-04-22T20:57:23Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses
dc.title.alternative.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparação entre as técnicas de inclusão em resina plástica à base de glicol metacrilato (GMA) e inclusão em parafina para avaliação da morfometria intestinal em equinos
title Comparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses
spellingShingle Comparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses
Cintia Ferreira
Biopsy
Equine
Intestinal mucosa
Small intestine
Villi height
Biópsia
Equino
Mucosa intestinal
Intestino delgado
title_short Comparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses
title_full Comparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses
title_fullStr Comparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses
title_sort Comparison between the techniques of inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)- based plastic resin and paraffin for evaluation intestinal morphometry in horses
author Cintia Ferreira
author_facet Cintia Ferreira
Maristela Silveira Palhares
Ubiratan Pereira de Melo
Helio Chiarini-Garcia
Renata de Pino Albuquerque Maranhão
Valentim Arabicano Gheller
Fabiola de Oliveira Paes Leme
author_role author
author2 Maristela Silveira Palhares
Ubiratan Pereira de Melo
Helio Chiarini-Garcia
Renata de Pino Albuquerque Maranhão
Valentim Arabicano Gheller
Fabiola de Oliveira Paes Leme
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cintia Ferreira
Maristela Silveira Palhares
Ubiratan Pereira de Melo
Helio Chiarini-Garcia
Renata de Pino Albuquerque Maranhão
Valentim Arabicano Gheller
Fabiola de Oliveira Paes Leme
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biopsy
Equine
Intestinal mucosa
Small intestine
Villi height
topic Biopsy
Equine
Intestinal mucosa
Small intestine
Villi height
Biópsia
Equino
Mucosa intestinal
Intestino delgado
dc.subject.other.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Biópsia
Equino
Mucosa intestinal
Intestino delgado
description To determine the effect of the inclusion method on the histomorphometric evaluation of the gastrointestinal mucosa of horses, jejunum samples were collected using flank laparotomy. Sixteen mixed breed healthy adult horses, including four males and 12 females, aged 4–14 years with an average body weight of 248.40 ± 2.28 kg, were used. Jejunal biopsies were collected and analyzed by light microscopy using two methods: group 1 comprised biopsies fixed using 10% neutral formalin and embedded in paraffin; biopsies in group 2 were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 7.2, followed by inclusion in glycol methacrylate (GMA)-based plastic resin. Intestinal villi height, crypt depth, glandular mucosa thickness, total mucosal thickness, and villus/crypt ratio were then evaluated. For all the variables studied, with exception of the villus/crypt ratio, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between samples in groups 1 and 2. Processing samples for embedding in plastic resin was quicker and easier to perform compared to that for paraffin embedding. In addition, the epithelial lining of tissues in group 2 showed better resolution for conducting cytological studies under a light microscope. The difference between the studied variables can be attributed to tissue retraction caused by conventional processing for inclusion in paraffin. Therefore, the method of inclusion in GMA described in the present study appears to be a more reliable choice for morphometric evaluation of the intestinal mucosa of horses.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-04-22T20:57:22Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2024-04-22T20:57:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1843/67539
dc.identifier.doi.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm004521
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2527-2179
dc.identifier.orcid.pt_BR.fl_str_mv http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-1580
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-2720
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-7868
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-672X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1983-3104
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4013-0147
url https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm004521
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/67539
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2473-1580
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-2720
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-7868
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-672X
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1983-3104
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4013-0147
identifier_str_mv 2527-2179
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Medicine
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFMG
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv VET - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA E CIRURGIA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG
instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron:UFMG
instname_str Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
instacron_str UFMG
institution UFMG
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFMG
collection Repositório Institucional da UFMG
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/67539/1/License.txt
https://repositorio.ufmg.br/bitstream/1843/67539/2/Comparison%20between%20the%20techniques%20of%20inclusion%20in%20glycol%20methacrylate%20%28GMA%29-%20based%20plastic%20resin%20and%20paraffin%20for%20evaluation%20intestinal%20morphometry%20in%20horses.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv fa505098d172de0bc8864fc1287ffe22
4d774a88e9496a674c2eb3d81277fe61
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1803589410973810688