Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/31344 |
Resumo: | This study investigates the amount of resources applied, through the budget of the Union, in sports and leisure policies from 1995 to 2016, trying to understand the way the theme was treated by the public power and what factors justified the priority of investments in this period. In this sense, the study is characterized as a quantitativequalitative research. Based on a documentary research on the budget execution of the programs and projects developed by the governments, it relates the amount invested with the political and administrative context of the managements carried out during the period and questions whether the federal public investment in sports and leisure contributed to the accomplishment of a policy of guarantee of rights. Through data collection in the Portal of the Chamber of Deputies and SIGA Brasil, it was possible to perceive that the budgetary distribution of the period revealed great oscillations, sometimes with privilege to the sport of participation and educational, or prioritizing the EAR. As a starting point, we highlight the administrative reform undertaken during the FHC period, which reduced the State's participation in the provision of social policies. From then on and during the Lula and Dilma governments, the main limitation observed originated in the practice of contingency of resources and in the low budget execution of the programs. In the first mandate of FHC it was not possible to define, through the collected data, the government's priority. In the second, it was verified that most of the authorized resources were spent in the Solidarity Sport program. As for the Lula government, the actions were directed, in the beginning, primarily, to the sports of participation and educational, through the programs PELC and PST. Since 2007 and during the Dilma government, the Pan American Games was focused on the preparation and accomplishment of major sporting events, with the objective of projecting the image of Brazil on the international scene, a perspective also aspirated by the government FHC. In this sense, even though the CF88 represents an important legal framework, what happens in certain periods is a greater allocation of resources in the EAR, privileging the interests of groups holding the economic power to the detriment of the actions of sport and leisure geared to the needs social rights. This change in trajectory contradicts and disrespects the provisions of the Charter that determines in paragraph II of Article 217 the allocation of public resources primarily for educational sport and only in specific cases for high-performance sport. |
id |
UFMG_fd68aa23464c57ea053a1f6157cff18f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/31344 |
network_acronym_str |
UFMG |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016EsporteFinanciamentoPolítica públicaLazerThis study investigates the amount of resources applied, through the budget of the Union, in sports and leisure policies from 1995 to 2016, trying to understand the way the theme was treated by the public power and what factors justified the priority of investments in this period. In this sense, the study is characterized as a quantitativequalitative research. Based on a documentary research on the budget execution of the programs and projects developed by the governments, it relates the amount invested with the political and administrative context of the managements carried out during the period and questions whether the federal public investment in sports and leisure contributed to the accomplishment of a policy of guarantee of rights. Through data collection in the Portal of the Chamber of Deputies and SIGA Brasil, it was possible to perceive that the budgetary distribution of the period revealed great oscillations, sometimes with privilege to the sport of participation and educational, or prioritizing the EAR. As a starting point, we highlight the administrative reform undertaken during the FHC period, which reduced the State's participation in the provision of social policies. From then on and during the Lula and Dilma governments, the main limitation observed originated in the practice of contingency of resources and in the low budget execution of the programs. In the first mandate of FHC it was not possible to define, through the collected data, the government's priority. In the second, it was verified that most of the authorized resources were spent in the Solidarity Sport program. As for the Lula government, the actions were directed, in the beginning, primarily, to the sports of participation and educational, through the programs PELC and PST. Since 2007 and during the Dilma government, the Pan American Games was focused on the preparation and accomplishment of major sporting events, with the objective of projecting the image of Brazil on the international scene, a perspective also aspirated by the government FHC. In this sense, even though the CF88 represents an important legal framework, what happens in certain periods is a greater allocation of resources in the EAR, privileging the interests of groups holding the economic power to the detriment of the actions of sport and leisure geared to the needs social rights. This change in trajectory contradicts and disrespects the provisions of the Charter that determines in paragraph II of Article 217 the allocation of public resources primarily for educational sport and only in specific cases for high-performance sport.Este trabalho investiga o montante de recursos aplicados, via orçamento da União, em políticas de esporte e lazer no período de 1995 a 2016, procurando compreender a forma como o tema foi tratado pelo poder público e quais fatores justificaram a prioridade dos investimentos nesse período. Nesse sentido, o estudo caracteriza-se como uma pesquisa de cunho quantitativo-qualitativo. Com base em pesquisa documental sobre a execução orçamentária dos programas e projetos desenvolvidos pelos governos, relaciona o montante investido com o contexto político e administrativo das gestões realizadas no período e problematiza se o investimento público federal em esporte e lazer contribuiu para a efetivação de uma política de garantia de direitos. Mediante coleta de dados no Portal da Câmara de Deputados e do SIGA Brasil, foi possível perceber que a distribuição orçamentária do período revelou grandes oscilações, ora com privilégio ao esporte de participação e educacional, ora priorizando o EAR. Como ponto de partida, destaca-se a reforma administrativa empreendida no período FHC que reduziu a participação do Estado no provimento de políticas sociais. A partir daí e durante os governos Lula e Dilma, a principal limitação observada originou-se na prática de contingenciamento de recursos e na baixa execução orçamentária dos programas. No primeiro mandato de FHC não foi possível definir, por meio dos dados coletados, a prioridade do governo. Já no segundo, verificou-se que a maior parte dos recursos autorizados foi gasto no programa Esporte Solidário. Quanto ao governo Lula, as ações foram direcionadas, a princípio, prioritariamente, ao esporte de participação e ao educacional, por meio dos programas PELC e PST. A partir de 2007 e durante o governo Dilma, tendo realizado os Jogos Pan-americanos, o foco passou a ser a preparação e realização dos grandes eventos esportivos, com o objetivo de projetar a imagem do Brasil no cenário internacional, perspectiva também aspirada pelo governo FHC. Nesse sentido, ainda que a CF88 represente um marco legal importante, o que se verifica em determinados períodos é uma maior alocação de recursos no EAR, privilegiando os interesses de grupos detentores do poder econômico em detrimento das ações de esporte e lazer voltadas para as necessidades sociais. Essa mudança de trajetória, contraria e desrespeita os preceitos da Carta Magna que determina no parágrafo II do Art. 217 a destinação de recursos públicos prioritariamente para o desporto educacional e apenas em casos específicos, para o desporto de alto rendimento.Universidade Federal de Minas GeraisBrasilEEFFTO - ESCOLA DE EDUCAÇÃO FISICA, FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONALPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Estudos do LazerUFMGLuciano Pereira da Silvahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4935803105467960Helder Ferreira IsayamaPedro Fernando Avalone de AthaydeRosângela Gomes Pinali2019-11-29T15:48:04Z2019-11-29T15:48:04Z2019-07-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/31344porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMGinstname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)instacron:UFMG2019-11-30T06:36:46Zoai:repositorio.ufmg.br:1843/31344Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufmg.br/oairepositorio@ufmg.bropendoar:2019-11-30T06:36:46Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016 |
title |
Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016 |
spellingShingle |
Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016 Rosângela Gomes Pinali Esporte Financiamento Política pública Lazer |
title_short |
Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016 |
title_full |
Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016 |
title_fullStr |
Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016 |
title_sort |
Financiamento dos programas federais de esporte e lazer no Brasil: 1995 - 2016 |
author |
Rosângela Gomes Pinali |
author_facet |
Rosângela Gomes Pinali |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Luciano Pereira da Silva http://lattes.cnpq.br/4935803105467960 Helder Ferreira Isayama Pedro Fernando Avalone de Athayde |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rosângela Gomes Pinali |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Esporte Financiamento Política pública Lazer |
topic |
Esporte Financiamento Política pública Lazer |
description |
This study investigates the amount of resources applied, through the budget of the Union, in sports and leisure policies from 1995 to 2016, trying to understand the way the theme was treated by the public power and what factors justified the priority of investments in this period. In this sense, the study is characterized as a quantitativequalitative research. Based on a documentary research on the budget execution of the programs and projects developed by the governments, it relates the amount invested with the political and administrative context of the managements carried out during the period and questions whether the federal public investment in sports and leisure contributed to the accomplishment of a policy of guarantee of rights. Through data collection in the Portal of the Chamber of Deputies and SIGA Brasil, it was possible to perceive that the budgetary distribution of the period revealed great oscillations, sometimes with privilege to the sport of participation and educational, or prioritizing the EAR. As a starting point, we highlight the administrative reform undertaken during the FHC period, which reduced the State's participation in the provision of social policies. From then on and during the Lula and Dilma governments, the main limitation observed originated in the practice of contingency of resources and in the low budget execution of the programs. In the first mandate of FHC it was not possible to define, through the collected data, the government's priority. In the second, it was verified that most of the authorized resources were spent in the Solidarity Sport program. As for the Lula government, the actions were directed, in the beginning, primarily, to the sports of participation and educational, through the programs PELC and PST. Since 2007 and during the Dilma government, the Pan American Games was focused on the preparation and accomplishment of major sporting events, with the objective of projecting the image of Brazil on the international scene, a perspective also aspirated by the government FHC. In this sense, even though the CF88 represents an important legal framework, what happens in certain periods is a greater allocation of resources in the EAR, privileging the interests of groups holding the economic power to the detriment of the actions of sport and leisure geared to the needs social rights. This change in trajectory contradicts and disrespects the provisions of the Charter that determines in paragraph II of Article 217 the allocation of public resources primarily for educational sport and only in specific cases for high-performance sport. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-29T15:48:04Z 2019-11-29T15:48:04Z 2019-07-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/31344 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/31344 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brasil EEFFTO - ESCOLA DE EDUCAÇÃO FISICA, FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos do Lazer UFMG |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Brasil EEFFTO - ESCOLA DE EDUCAÇÃO FISICA, FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONAL Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos do Lazer UFMG |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFMG instname:Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) instacron:UFMG |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
instacron_str |
UFMG |
institution |
UFMG |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ufmg.br |
_version_ |
1816829857258012672 |