THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Liakopoulos, Dimitris
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Direito UFMS
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufms.br/index.php/revdir/article/view/7430
Resumo: The judges in Strasbourg claim to reason. Our scope will now try to illustrate their position in relation to the two different areas. First, the probative limits that, in some national contexts, seem to be aimed primarily at making the search for truth in the process more efficient; after that, the attention will be shifted to the rules of proof placed to protect the interests of the endoprocessual or extraprocessual other than the ascertainment of the facts.
id UFMS-3_b2a68db2492eb1bbe0b0365c6191f654
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufms.br:article/7430
network_acronym_str UFMS-3
network_name_str Revista Direito UFMS
repository_id_str
spelling THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTSThe judges in Strasbourg claim to reason. Our scope will now try to illustrate their position in relation to the two different areas. First, the probative limits that, in some national contexts, seem to be aimed primarily at making the search for truth in the process more efficient; after that, the attention will be shifted to the rules of proof placed to protect the interests of the endoprocessual or extraprocessual other than the ascertainment of the facts.UFMS2019-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufms.br/index.php/revdir/article/view/743010.21671/rdufms.v5i1.7430UFMS Law Review; Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Revista Direito UFMSRevista Direito UFMS; v. 5 n. 1 (2019): Revista Direito UFMS2447-2336reponame:Revista Direito UFMSinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)instacron:UFMSenghttps://periodicos.ufms.br/index.php/revdir/article/view/7430/6097Liakopoulos, Dimitrisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-05-08T22:26:13Zoai:periodicos.ufms.br:article/7430Revistahttp://seer.ufms.br/index.php/revdir/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufms.br/index.php/revdir/oai||revistadireitoufms1@gmail.com2447-23362447-2336opendoar:2020-05-08T22:26:13Revista Direito UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
spellingShingle THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Liakopoulos, Dimitris
title_short THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_full THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_fullStr THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_full_unstemmed THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
title_sort THE TREATMENT OF HEARSAY, BAD CHARACTER AND OPINION EVIDENCE IN THE CONVENTIONAL FIELD. THE ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
author Liakopoulos, Dimitris
author_facet Liakopoulos, Dimitris
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Liakopoulos, Dimitris
description The judges in Strasbourg claim to reason. Our scope will now try to illustrate their position in relation to the two different areas. First, the probative limits that, in some national contexts, seem to be aimed primarily at making the search for truth in the process more efficient; after that, the attention will be shifted to the rules of proof placed to protect the interests of the endoprocessual or extraprocessual other than the ascertainment of the facts.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufms.br/index.php/revdir/article/view/7430
10.21671/rdufms.v5i1.7430
url https://periodicos.ufms.br/index.php/revdir/article/view/7430
identifier_str_mv 10.21671/rdufms.v5i1.7430
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufms.br/index.php/revdir/article/view/7430/6097
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFMS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFMS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv UFMS Law Review; Vol 5 No 1 (2019): Revista Direito UFMS
Revista Direito UFMS; v. 5 n. 1 (2019): Revista Direito UFMS
2447-2336
reponame:Revista Direito UFMS
instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron:UFMS
instname_str Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
instacron_str UFMS
institution UFMS
reponame_str Revista Direito UFMS
collection Revista Direito UFMS
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito UFMS - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitoufms1@gmail.com
_version_ 1798329663577128960

Registros relacionados