Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Weriq Teodoro da
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
Texto Completo: http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/926
Resumo: The search for phytopathogen control agents that have little impact on the environment and that are viable and efficient in the most diverse agroecosystems has been increasing.This work aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the alternative control of Helicotylenchus multicinctus in banana crop as an alternative to the use of chemical nematicides and its limitations, such as high cost, unsatisfactory control levels and environmental contamination. Tests were carried out under greenhouse and field conditions with soil naturally infested with nematodes and tested the following agents: papaya seed meal (FSM); Pumpkin Seed Meal (FSA); Trichoderma asperellum and Bacillus methylotrophicus (TB); Pochonia chlamydosporia (PC) and Carbofuran. Distilled water was used as a control. All control agents were solubilized in 15L of distilled water and applied to the soil via watering can. The application of each treatment was performed in an area of 16 m², containing 4 bananas trees of approximately 4 years of age. A randomized complete block design (DBC) was used for the field conditions test. In the test under greenhouse conditions, a completely randomized design (DIC). In both trials 6 treatments and 8 replicates were used in total (each plant represented one replicate).The seedlings were obtained from tissue culture in culture medium. These were removed from the culture medium for the assay with 70 days old. On the same day the soil sampling and the evaluation of the initial population of nematodes were carried out. After 75 days of the application of the alternative control agents, soil and roots samples were taken for quantification of the final nematode population and, from the evaluation of the development of the seedlings: dry weight of aerial part, fresh weight of aerial part and roots, height and length of roots. In field conditions, no statistical difference was observed in relation to the control for any control agent tested, in soil and root, for the nematode population. In greenhouse the FSM was superior to the other treatments for fresh weight of the aerial part, fresh weight of the root and dry weight of the aerial part. For the soil nematode population, PC was superior to the combination of TB and the control with 99.2% relative control, while FSA was superior only to the control (88.3%). The other treatments did not present statistical difference for soil and root populations. FSA and TB were able to reduce infestation in roots by 100% in relation to the control, although they did not differ statistically from the other agents.
id UFMT-1_9e2608b53153abea8432c6c7ce44a422
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:1/926
network_acronym_str UFMT-1
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
repository_id_str
spelling Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeiraCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIAControle alternativoNematoidesBananaFitossanidadeHelicotylenchus multicinctusAlternative controlNematodesBananaPhitosanitaryHelicotylenchus multicinctusThe search for phytopathogen control agents that have little impact on the environment and that are viable and efficient in the most diverse agroecosystems has been increasing.This work aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the alternative control of Helicotylenchus multicinctus in banana crop as an alternative to the use of chemical nematicides and its limitations, such as high cost, unsatisfactory control levels and environmental contamination. Tests were carried out under greenhouse and field conditions with soil naturally infested with nematodes and tested the following agents: papaya seed meal (FSM); Pumpkin Seed Meal (FSA); Trichoderma asperellum and Bacillus methylotrophicus (TB); Pochonia chlamydosporia (PC) and Carbofuran. Distilled water was used as a control. All control agents were solubilized in 15L of distilled water and applied to the soil via watering can. The application of each treatment was performed in an area of 16 m², containing 4 bananas trees of approximately 4 years of age. A randomized complete block design (DBC) was used for the field conditions test. In the test under greenhouse conditions, a completely randomized design (DIC). In both trials 6 treatments and 8 replicates were used in total (each plant represented one replicate).The seedlings were obtained from tissue culture in culture medium. These were removed from the culture medium for the assay with 70 days old. On the same day the soil sampling and the evaluation of the initial population of nematodes were carried out. After 75 days of the application of the alternative control agents, soil and roots samples were taken for quantification of the final nematode population and, from the evaluation of the development of the seedlings: dry weight of aerial part, fresh weight of aerial part and roots, height and length of roots. In field conditions, no statistical difference was observed in relation to the control for any control agent tested, in soil and root, for the nematode population. In greenhouse the FSM was superior to the other treatments for fresh weight of the aerial part, fresh weight of the root and dry weight of the aerial part. For the soil nematode population, PC was superior to the combination of TB and the control with 99.2% relative control, while FSA was superior only to the control (88.3%). The other treatments did not present statistical difference for soil and root populations. FSA and TB were able to reduce infestation in roots by 100% in relation to the control, although they did not differ statistically from the other agents.Tem sido crescente a busca por agentes de controle de fitopatógenos pouco impactantes ao meio ambiente e que sejam viáveis e eficientes nos mais diversos agroecossistemas. Este trabalho visou avaliar a eficácia do controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira, como alternativa ao uso de nematicidas químicos e às suas limitações, tais como o custo elevado, níveis de controle não satisfatórios e contaminação ambiental. Foram realizados testes em condições de casa-de-vegetação e a campo com solo naturalmente infestado com nematoides e testados os seguintes agentes:farinha de semente de mamão (FSM); farinha de semente de abóbora (FSA); Trichoderma asperellum e Bacillus methylotrophicus (TB); Pochonia chlamydosporia (PC) e Carbofurano. Como testemunha foi utilizado água destilada. Todos os agentes de controle foram solubilizados em 15L de água destilada e aplicados ao solo via regador. A aplicação de cada tratamento foi realizada em uma área de 16m², contendo 4 bananeiras de aproximadamente 4 anos de idade. No ensaio em condições de campo foi adotado um delineamento experimental em blocos casualizados (DBC). No teste em condições de casa-de-vegetação, um delineamento inteiramente casualizados (DIC). Em ambos os ensaios se totalizaram 6 tratamentos e 8 repetições (cada planta representou uma repetição). As mudas foram obtidas a partir de cultura de tecido em meio de cultura. Estas foram retiradas do meio de cultura para o ensaio aos 70 dias de idade. No mesmo dia realizou-se a amostragem do solo e a avaliação da população inicial de nematoides. Após 75 dias da aplicação dos agentes de controle alternativo, foram retiradas amostras de solo e raízes a campo para a quantificação da população final de nematoides e, da avaliação do desenvolvimento das mudas: peso seco da parte aérea, peso fresco da parte aérea e raízes, altura e comprimento de raízes. Nos testes em condições de campo, não se observou diferença estatística em relação à testemunha para qualquer agente de controle testado, tanto em solo quanto em raiz, para população de nematoide. Em casa-de-vegetação a FSM se mostrou superior aos demais tratamentos para peso fresco da parte aérea, peso fresco da raiz e peso seco da parte aérea. Para população de nematoides no solo, PC se mostrou superior à combinação de TB e à testemunha com controle relativo de 99,2%, enquanto FSA foi superior apenas à testemunha (88,3%). Os demais tratamentos não apresentaram diferença estatística para população no solo e nas raízes. PC e FSA foram capazes de reduzir em 100% a infestação nas raízes em relação à testemunha, apesar de não diferirem estatisticamente dos demais agentes.Universidade Federal de Mato GrossoBrasilInstituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais (ICAA) – SinopUFMT CUS - SinopAgronomia - CUSShiomi, Humberto Francohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3182071624701837Ferrari, Elisangelahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2596802826097068Shiomi, Humberto Francohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3182071624701837Ferrari, Elisangelahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2596802826097068Vieira, Carlos Viniciohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1551752433631653Silva, Weriq Teodoro da2019-04-17T13:45:12Z2018-03-022019-04-17T13:45:12Z2018-03-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/datasetSILVA, Weriq Teodoro da. Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira. 2018. 29f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Agronomia) – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, Sinop, 2018.http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/926porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMTinstname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)instacron:UFMT2019-04-18T07:01:15Zoai:localhost:1/926Biblioteca Digital de Monografiahttps://bdm.ufmt.br/PUBhttp://200.129.241.122/oai/requestopendoar:2019-04-18T07:01:15falseBiblioteca Digital de Monografiahttps://bdm.ufmt.br/PUBhttp://200.129.241.122/oai/requestbibliotecacentral@ufmt.br||opendoar:2019-04-18T07:01:15Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira
title Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira
spellingShingle Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira
Silva, Weriq Teodoro da
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
Controle alternativo
Nematoides
Banana
Fitossanidade
Helicotylenchus multicinctus
Alternative control
Nematodes
Banana
Phitosanitary
Helicotylenchus multicinctus
title_short Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira
title_full Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira
title_fullStr Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira
title_full_unstemmed Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira
title_sort Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira
author Silva, Weriq Teodoro da
author_facet Silva, Weriq Teodoro da
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Shiomi, Humberto Franco
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3182071624701837
Ferrari, Elisangela
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2596802826097068
Shiomi, Humberto Franco
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3182071624701837
Ferrari, Elisangela
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2596802826097068
Vieira, Carlos Vinicio
http://lattes.cnpq.br/1551752433631653
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Weriq Teodoro da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
Controle alternativo
Nematoides
Banana
Fitossanidade
Helicotylenchus multicinctus
Alternative control
Nematodes
Banana
Phitosanitary
Helicotylenchus multicinctus
topic CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
Controle alternativo
Nematoides
Banana
Fitossanidade
Helicotylenchus multicinctus
Alternative control
Nematodes
Banana
Phitosanitary
Helicotylenchus multicinctus
description The search for phytopathogen control agents that have little impact on the environment and that are viable and efficient in the most diverse agroecosystems has been increasing.This work aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the alternative control of Helicotylenchus multicinctus in banana crop as an alternative to the use of chemical nematicides and its limitations, such as high cost, unsatisfactory control levels and environmental contamination. Tests were carried out under greenhouse and field conditions with soil naturally infested with nematodes and tested the following agents: papaya seed meal (FSM); Pumpkin Seed Meal (FSA); Trichoderma asperellum and Bacillus methylotrophicus (TB); Pochonia chlamydosporia (PC) and Carbofuran. Distilled water was used as a control. All control agents were solubilized in 15L of distilled water and applied to the soil via watering can. The application of each treatment was performed in an area of 16 m², containing 4 bananas trees of approximately 4 years of age. A randomized complete block design (DBC) was used for the field conditions test. In the test under greenhouse conditions, a completely randomized design (DIC). In both trials 6 treatments and 8 replicates were used in total (each plant represented one replicate).The seedlings were obtained from tissue culture in culture medium. These were removed from the culture medium for the assay with 70 days old. On the same day the soil sampling and the evaluation of the initial population of nematodes were carried out. After 75 days of the application of the alternative control agents, soil and roots samples were taken for quantification of the final nematode population and, from the evaluation of the development of the seedlings: dry weight of aerial part, fresh weight of aerial part and roots, height and length of roots. In field conditions, no statistical difference was observed in relation to the control for any control agent tested, in soil and root, for the nematode population. In greenhouse the FSM was superior to the other treatments for fresh weight of the aerial part, fresh weight of the root and dry weight of the aerial part. For the soil nematode population, PC was superior to the combination of TB and the control with 99.2% relative control, while FSA was superior only to the control (88.3%). The other treatments did not present statistical difference for soil and root populations. FSA and TB were able to reduce infestation in roots by 100% in relation to the control, although they did not differ statistically from the other agents.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-02
2018-03-02
2019-04-17T13:45:12Z
2019-04-17T13:45:12Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/dataset
format bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv SILVA, Weriq Teodoro da. Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira. 2018. 29f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Agronomia) – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, Sinop, 2018.
http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/926
identifier_str_mv SILVA, Weriq Teodoro da. Controle alternativo de Helicotylenchus multicinctus na cultura da bananeira. 2018. 29f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Agronomia) – Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, Sinop, 2018.
url http://bdm.ufmt.br/handle/1/926
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Brasil
Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais (ICAA) – Sinop
UFMT CUS - Sinop
Agronomia - CUS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
Brasil
Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais (ICAA) – Sinop
UFMT CUS - Sinop
Agronomia - CUS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
instname:Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
instacron:UFMT
instname_str Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
instacron_str UFMT
institution UFMT
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
collection Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Monografias da UFMT - Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (UFMT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bibliotecacentral@ufmt.br||
_version_ 1813012948675723264