Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial period
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | História da Historiografia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1707 |
Resumo: | This article analyzes the production of a novelty in writings on history in the 1920s, that is, before the creation of faculties of history in Brazil and professionalization of historians. The objective is to show that the categorization of works in a genealogy of theories, methods and authors normally considered as historians (by profession or not), that today compose a view of the discipline’s “evolution”, is insufficient to encompass the complexities involved in the election of a book as a novelty. In order to show this, Vida e morte do bandeirante, by José de Alcântara Machado (1875-1941), published in 1929, is taken as the guiding thread, as well as its relations with other authors who wrote on the same theme in the same period. By comparing these authors “in competition”, analyzing book reviews and contrasting the work with other books in the past, it can be understood that the novelty was expressed more by the form of writing, by approaching an already existing tendency of reports of curiosities about the past and the establishment of connections with law, rather than the attachment to historiographic methods or the distancing from them. Bringing all this to the debate thus allows a better understanding of the relations established between the author, the work, its readers and the intellectual space of São Paulo in the 1920s. |
id |
UFOP-2_1aa00f625cf14860be1699923afc5552 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1707 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOP-2 |
network_name_str |
História da Historiografia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial periodInovação “historiográfica” antes da história-disciplina: Alcântara Machado e a escrita sobre São Paulo no período colonialHistoriografia brasileiraMétodoHistória regional e localBrazilian historiographyMethodRegional and local historyThis article analyzes the production of a novelty in writings on history in the 1920s, that is, before the creation of faculties of history in Brazil and professionalization of historians. The objective is to show that the categorization of works in a genealogy of theories, methods and authors normally considered as historians (by profession or not), that today compose a view of the discipline’s “evolution”, is insufficient to encompass the complexities involved in the election of a book as a novelty. In order to show this, Vida e morte do bandeirante, by José de Alcântara Machado (1875-1941), published in 1929, is taken as the guiding thread, as well as its relations with other authors who wrote on the same theme in the same period. By comparing these authors “in competition”, analyzing book reviews and contrasting the work with other books in the past, it can be understood that the novelty was expressed more by the form of writing, by approaching an already existing tendency of reports of curiosities about the past and the establishment of connections with law, rather than the attachment to historiographic methods or the distancing from them. Bringing all this to the debate thus allows a better understanding of the relations established between the author, the work, its readers and the intellectual space of São Paulo in the 1920s.Este artigo analisa a produção de uma novidade em escritos sobre a história nos anos 1920, ou seja, antes da criação de faculdades de História no Brasil e posterior profissionalização dos historiadores. O objetivo é mostrar que a categorização das obras em uma genealogia de teorias, métodos e autores normalmente tidos como historiadores (de ofício ou não) e que hoje compõem uma visão de “evolução” da disciplina é insuficiente para abarcar as complexidades envolvidas na eleição de uma obra como novidade. Dessa forma, tomou-se como fio condutor o livro Vida e morte do bandeirante, de José de Alcântara Machado de Oliveira (1875-1941), publicado em 1929, e sua relação com outros autores que escreviam sobre a mesma temática no mesmo período. Ao se cotejar esses autores “em uma concorrência”, analisar as críticas de recepção da obra e relacioná-la com outros livros sobre o passado paulista, pode-se compreender que a novidade se expressou mais pela forma da escrita, pela aproximação a uma tendência já existente de relatos de curiosidades sobre o passado e pela relação com o direito, do que pelo apego a métodos historiográficos ou distanciamento deles. Trazer tudo isso para o debate permite, assim, compreender melhor as relações estabelecidas entre autor, obra, seus leitores e o espaço intelectual paulista dos anos 1920.Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos pares, dossiêapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/170710.15848/hh.v14i36.1707História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 36 (2021); 319-348História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 36 (2021); 319-348História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 36 (2021); 319-3481983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPporhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1707/953Copyright (c) 2021 Franco Della Vallehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDella Valle, Franco2021-08-31T22:25:39Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1707Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2021-08-31T22:25:39História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial period Inovação “historiográfica” antes da história-disciplina: Alcântara Machado e a escrita sobre São Paulo no período colonial |
title |
Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial period |
spellingShingle |
Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial period Della Valle, Franco Historiografia brasileira Método História regional e local Brazilian historiography Method Regional and local history |
title_short |
Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial period |
title_full |
Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial period |
title_fullStr |
Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial period |
title_full_unstemmed |
Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial period |
title_sort |
Historiographic “innovation” before History as discipline: Alcântara Machado and writing about São Paulo in the colonial period |
author |
Della Valle, Franco |
author_facet |
Della Valle, Franco |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Della Valle, Franco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Historiografia brasileira Método História regional e local Brazilian historiography Method Regional and local history |
topic |
Historiografia brasileira Método História regional e local Brazilian historiography Method Regional and local history |
description |
This article analyzes the production of a novelty in writings on history in the 1920s, that is, before the creation of faculties of history in Brazil and professionalization of historians. The objective is to show that the categorization of works in a genealogy of theories, methods and authors normally considered as historians (by profession or not), that today compose a view of the discipline’s “evolution”, is insufficient to encompass the complexities involved in the election of a book as a novelty. In order to show this, Vida e morte do bandeirante, by José de Alcântara Machado (1875-1941), published in 1929, is taken as the guiding thread, as well as its relations with other authors who wrote on the same theme in the same period. By comparing these authors “in competition”, analyzing book reviews and contrasting the work with other books in the past, it can be understood that the novelty was expressed more by the form of writing, by approaching an already existing tendency of reports of curiosities about the past and the establishment of connections with law, rather than the attachment to historiographic methods or the distancing from them. Bringing all this to the debate thus allows a better understanding of the relations established between the author, the work, its readers and the intellectual space of São Paulo in the 1920s. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares, dossiê |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1707 10.15848/hh.v14i36.1707 |
url |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1707 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15848/hh.v14i36.1707 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1707/953 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Franco Della Valle https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Franco Della Valle https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 36 (2021); 319-348 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 36 (2021); 319-348 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 36 (2021); 319-348 1983-9928 reponame:História da Historiografia instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
instacron_str |
UFOP |
institution |
UFOP |
reponame_str |
História da Historiografia |
collection |
História da Historiografia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1797220360439988224 |