“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | História da Historiografia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1716 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to investigate the role played by the Revue des Annales in the budding field of studies which would come to be known as Social and Economic History. The ideas proposed by Marc Bloch and Lucien Febvre in 1929 lacked novelty; yet, we argue that both historians were able to formulate a distinct way of enunciating their area of expertise, which would prove to be particularly efficient when compared to other strategies of enunciation, such as those proposed by Henri Sée and Henri Hauser. To prove such hypothesis, we examine these alternative propositions, comparing them to the ways in which the Annales employ the label “social and economic history”. With that, we aim to understand the enunciating strategies used by the annalistes while considering the objective conditions of their formulation, besides evaluating the role of these discursive strategies in the struggle of Social and Economic History for achieving disciplinary prominence. |
id |
UFOP-2_764ab0f8746f77dac8443161b63529b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1716 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOP-2 |
network_name_str |
História da Historiografia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history“Do ponto de vista dos nossos Annales”: a Revista dos Annales e a produção da história econômica e social (1929-1944)AnnalesFrench historiographyIntellectual HistoryAnnalesHistoriografia francesaHistória IntelectualThis paper aims to investigate the role played by the Revue des Annales in the budding field of studies which would come to be known as Social and Economic History. The ideas proposed by Marc Bloch and Lucien Febvre in 1929 lacked novelty; yet, we argue that both historians were able to formulate a distinct way of enunciating their area of expertise, which would prove to be particularly efficient when compared to other strategies of enunciation, such as those proposed by Henri Sée and Henri Hauser. To prove such hypothesis, we examine these alternative propositions, comparing them to the ways in which the Annales employ the label “social and economic history”. With that, we aim to understand the enunciating strategies used by the annalistes while considering the objective conditions of their formulation, besides evaluating the role of these discursive strategies in the struggle of Social and Economic History for achieving disciplinary prominence.Neste artigo, propõe-se investigar a inserção da revista dos Annales, em suas décadas iniciais, na área nascente da história econômica e social, sublinhando-se as especificidades da intervenção do periódico nesse domínio disciplinar em vias de consolidação. Argumenta-se que, apesar de as ideias que veiculam não serem, em 1929, inéditas, Marc Bloch e Lucien Febvre logram, nas páginas da revista, produzir um modo de enunciação distinto de sua especialidade disciplinar, que se demonstraria mais eficaz do que os projetos concorrentes propostos por nomes destacados como Henri Sée e Henri Hauser. Para isso, procede-se tanto à exposição dessas propostas concorrentes quanto à análise verticalizada dos usos feitos, na seção crítica dos Annales d’Histoire Économique et Sociale, do rótulo “histórica econômica e social”. Busca-se, assim, investigar as especificidades desses usos, articulando-as às condições objetivas de sua formulação e avaliando seus efeitos na disputa dessa especialidade por protagonismo no seio da disciplina histórica.Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos pares, dossiêapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/171610.15848/hh.v14i36.1716História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 36 (2021); 435-463História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 36 (2021); 435-463História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 36 (2021); 435-4631983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPporhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1716/957Copyright (c) 2021 Mariana Ladeira Oséshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOsés, Mariana Ladeira2021-08-31T22:23:16Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/1716Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2021-08-31T22:23:16História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history “Do ponto de vista dos nossos Annales”: a Revista dos Annales e a produção da história econômica e social (1929-1944) |
title |
“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history |
spellingShingle |
“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history Osés, Mariana Ladeira Annales French historiography Intellectual History Annales Historiografia francesa História Intelectual |
title_short |
“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history |
title_full |
“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history |
title_fullStr |
“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history |
title_full_unstemmed |
“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history |
title_sort |
“From the Annales’ point of view”: the Revue des Annales and the making of social and economic history |
author |
Osés, Mariana Ladeira |
author_facet |
Osés, Mariana Ladeira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Osés, Mariana Ladeira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Annales French historiography Intellectual History Annales Historiografia francesa História Intelectual |
topic |
Annales French historiography Intellectual History Annales Historiografia francesa História Intelectual |
description |
This paper aims to investigate the role played by the Revue des Annales in the budding field of studies which would come to be known as Social and Economic History. The ideas proposed by Marc Bloch and Lucien Febvre in 1929 lacked novelty; yet, we argue that both historians were able to formulate a distinct way of enunciating their area of expertise, which would prove to be particularly efficient when compared to other strategies of enunciation, such as those proposed by Henri Sée and Henri Hauser. To prove such hypothesis, we examine these alternative propositions, comparing them to the ways in which the Annales employ the label “social and economic history”. With that, we aim to understand the enunciating strategies used by the annalistes while considering the objective conditions of their formulation, besides evaluating the role of these discursive strategies in the struggle of Social and Economic History for achieving disciplinary prominence. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares, dossiê |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1716 10.15848/hh.v14i36.1716 |
url |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1716 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15848/hh.v14i36.1716 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/1716/957 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Mariana Ladeira Osés https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Mariana Ladeira Osés https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 No. 36 (2021); 435-463 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 14 Núm. 36 (2021); 435-463 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 14 n. 36 (2021); 435-463 1983-9928 reponame:História da Historiografia instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
instacron_str |
UFOP |
institution |
UFOP |
reponame_str |
História da Historiografia |
collection |
História da Historiografia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1797220360449425408 |