Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th Century
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | História da Historiografia |
Texto Completo: | https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/432 |
Resumo: | This text has the aim of discussing aspects of the intellectual process that resulted in Lucien Febvre’s classical book Le problem de l’incroyance au XVIe siècle: la religion de Rabelais. It makes a supplementary discussion of the answers presented by the author (in terms of pointing out to flaws and weaknesses) and the alternatives that he offered (in terms of creation and usage of concepts) as the established ways of conceiving and writing history in the mid-twentieth century. The book is particularly revealing in relation to these aspects, especially when it comes to the specificities of language in the sixteenth-century literature. Beyond analyzing the principles of Febvre’s interpretative theory and the book’s impact on contemporary historical thought, this text intends to demonstrate that the work not only is not dead, but it is still extremely up-to-date. |
id |
UFOP-2_ddddfa3b62166d339b1d05cccdc018e0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/432 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOP-2 |
network_name_str |
História da Historiografia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th CenturyLucien Febvre reformador: notas em torno de O problema da descrença no século XVIAnachronism20th century historiographyLanguageAnacronismoHistoriografía del siglo XXLenguajeAnacronismoHistoriografia do século XXLinguagemThis text has the aim of discussing aspects of the intellectual process that resulted in Lucien Febvre’s classical book Le problem de l’incroyance au XVIe siècle: la religion de Rabelais. It makes a supplementary discussion of the answers presented by the author (in terms of pointing out to flaws and weaknesses) and the alternatives that he offered (in terms of creation and usage of concepts) as the established ways of conceiving and writing history in the mid-twentieth century. The book is particularly revealing in relation to these aspects, especially when it comes to the specificities of language in the sixteenth-century literature. Beyond analyzing the principles of Febvre’s interpretative theory and the book’s impact on contemporary historical thought, this text intends to demonstrate that the work not only is not dead, but it is still extremely up-to-date.O presente texto tem por propósito apresentar aspectos do processo de produção do clássico Le problème de l’incroyance au XVIe siècle: la religion de Rabelais, de autoria de Lucien Febvre. Em sentido complementar, discutem-se as respostas que o autor deu (em termos de apontar falhas e deficiências) e as alternativas que ofereceu (em termos de criação e utilização de conceitos), as maneiras consagradas de se conceber e de se escrever a história nos meados do século XX. São aspectos em relação aos quais o livro em tela é especialmente revelador, mormente quando se trata das especificidades linguísticas da literatura quinhentista. Para além da análise dos princípios da teoria interpretativa firmada por Febvre, e dos efeitos de renovação exercidos por sua obra, no plano do pensamento histórico contemporâneo, pretende-se demonstrar que o livro não está morto, e que continua a alimentar o interesse de leitores na atualidade.Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2012-08-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/43210.15848/hh.v0i10.432História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 5 No. 10 (2012); 229-246História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 5 Núm. 10 (2012); 229-246História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 5 n. 10 (2012); 229-2461983-9928reponame:História da Historiografiainstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPporhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/432/321Lopes, Marcos Antônioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-05-02T02:40:43Zoai:ojs.www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br:article/432Revistahttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revistaPUBhttps://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/oaivaldei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com1983-99281983-9928opendoar:2020-05-02T02:40:43História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th Century Lucien Febvre reformador: notas em torno de O problema da descrença no século XVI |
title |
Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th Century |
spellingShingle |
Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th Century Lopes, Marcos Antônio Anachronism 20th century historiography Language Anacronismo Historiografía del siglo XX Lenguaje Anacronismo Historiografia do século XX Linguagem |
title_short |
Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th Century |
title_full |
Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th Century |
title_fullStr |
Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th Century |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th Century |
title_sort |
Lucien Febvre as a Reformer: notes on The Problem of Unbelief in the 16th Century |
author |
Lopes, Marcos Antônio |
author_facet |
Lopes, Marcos Antônio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes, Marcos Antônio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anachronism 20th century historiography Language Anacronismo Historiografía del siglo XX Lenguaje Anacronismo Historiografia do século XX Linguagem |
topic |
Anachronism 20th century historiography Language Anacronismo Historiografía del siglo XX Lenguaje Anacronismo Historiografia do século XX Linguagem |
description |
This text has the aim of discussing aspects of the intellectual process that resulted in Lucien Febvre’s classical book Le problem de l’incroyance au XVIe siècle: la religion de Rabelais. It makes a supplementary discussion of the answers presented by the author (in terms of pointing out to flaws and weaknesses) and the alternatives that he offered (in terms of creation and usage of concepts) as the established ways of conceiving and writing history in the mid-twentieth century. The book is particularly revealing in relation to these aspects, especially when it comes to the specificities of language in the sixteenth-century literature. Beyond analyzing the principles of Febvre’s interpretative theory and the book’s impact on contemporary historical thought, this text intends to demonstrate that the work not only is not dead, but it is still extremely up-to-date. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-08-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/432 10.15848/hh.v0i10.432 |
url |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/432 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15848/hh.v0i10.432 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.historiadahistoriografia.com.br/revista/article/view/432/321 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Teoria e História da Historiografia, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 5 No. 10 (2012); 229-246 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; Vol. 5 Núm. 10 (2012); 229-246 História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography; v. 5 n. 10 (2012); 229-246 1983-9928 reponame:História da Historiografia instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
instacron_str |
UFOP |
institution |
UFOP |
reponame_str |
História da Historiografia |
collection |
História da Historiografia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
História da Historiografia - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
valdei354@gmail.com || historiadahistoriografia@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1797220357391777793 |