Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius de
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Leitão, Carla Faria, Prates, Raquel Oliveira, Bim, Silvia Amélia, Silva, Elton José da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFOP
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/4410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.006
Resumo: HCI evaluation methods tend to be proposed and used to verify the interactive qualities of specific systems and design strategies. A discussion about the scientific merits of such methods to advance knowledge in HCI as a field is very rare, although much needed. This paper shows that, under certain conditions, inspection methods can be safely used in scientific research in HCI and extend their advantages beyond the territory of professional practice. Taking the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) as an example, we argue that its interpretive results are objective, can be validated, and produce scientific knowledge comparable to that generated by more widely accepted methods.
id UFOP_d0f093e99b82efe5c9c15e9a762ef572
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:123456789/4410
network_acronym_str UFOP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
repository_id_str 3233
spelling Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius deLeitão, Carla FariaPrates, Raquel OliveiraBim, Silvia AméliaSilva, Elton José da2015-01-28T19:47:21Z2015-01-28T19:47:21Z2006SOUZA, C. S. de et al. Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI?: The case of semiotic inspection. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 68, n. 1-2, p. 22-40, jan./fev. 2009. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581909001128?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2019.1071-5819http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/4410https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.006HCI evaluation methods tend to be proposed and used to verify the interactive qualities of specific systems and design strategies. A discussion about the scientific merits of such methods to advance knowledge in HCI as a field is very rare, although much needed. This paper shows that, under certain conditions, inspection methods can be safely used in scientific research in HCI and extend their advantages beyond the territory of professional practice. Taking the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) as an example, we argue that its interpretive results are objective, can be validated, and produce scientific knowledge comparable to that generated by more widely accepted methods.Semiotic engineeringEvaluation methodSemiotic inspection methodScientific applicationTechnical applicationCan inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleO periódico International Journal of Human-Computer Studies concede permissão para depósito do artigo no Repositório Institucional da UFOP. Número da licença: 3552530280713.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOPinstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOPLICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82636http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/bitstream/123456789/4410/2/license.txtc2ffdd99e58acf69202dff00d361f23aMD52ORIGINALARTIGO_CanInspectionMethods.pdfARTIGO_CanInspectionMethods.pdfapplication/pdf529183http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/bitstream/123456789/4410/1/ARTIGO_CanInspectionMethods.pdfe7d2c30e80277d56d2f47787a1b56c81MD51123456789/44102019-06-13 14:09:24.052oai:localhost: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/oai/requestrepositorio@ufop.edu.bropendoar:32332019-06-13T18:09:24Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.
title Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.
spellingShingle Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.
Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius de
Semiotic engineering
Evaluation method
Semiotic inspection method
Scientific application
Technical application
title_short Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.
title_full Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.
title_fullStr Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.
title_full_unstemmed Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.
title_sort Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? : The case of semiotic inspection.
author Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius de
author_facet Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius de
Leitão, Carla Faria
Prates, Raquel Oliveira
Bim, Silvia Amélia
Silva, Elton José da
author_role author
author2 Leitão, Carla Faria
Prates, Raquel Oliveira
Bim, Silvia Amélia
Silva, Elton José da
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Clarisse Sieckenius de
Leitão, Carla Faria
Prates, Raquel Oliveira
Bim, Silvia Amélia
Silva, Elton José da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Semiotic engineering
Evaluation method
Semiotic inspection method
Scientific application
Technical application
topic Semiotic engineering
Evaluation method
Semiotic inspection method
Scientific application
Technical application
description HCI evaluation methods tend to be proposed and used to verify the interactive qualities of specific systems and design strategies. A discussion about the scientific merits of such methods to advance knowledge in HCI as a field is very rare, although much needed. This paper shows that, under certain conditions, inspection methods can be safely used in scientific research in HCI and extend their advantages beyond the territory of professional practice. Taking the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM) as an example, we argue that its interpretive results are objective, can be validated, and produce scientific knowledge comparable to that generated by more widely accepted methods.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2006
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-01-28T19:47:21Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2015-01-28T19:47:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SOUZA, C. S. de et al. Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI?: The case of semiotic inspection. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 68, n. 1-2, p. 22-40, jan./fev. 2009. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581909001128?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2019.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/4410
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1071-5819
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.006
identifier_str_mv SOUZA, C. S. de et al. Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI?: The case of semiotic inspection. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v. 68, n. 1-2, p. 22-40, jan./fev. 2009. Disponível em: <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581909001128?via%3Dihub>. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2019.
1071-5819
url http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/4410
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOP
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
collection Repositório Institucional da UFOP
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/bitstream/123456789/4410/2/license.txt
http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/bitstream/123456789/4410/1/ARTIGO_CanInspectionMethods.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c2ffdd99e58acf69202dff00d361f23a
e7d2c30e80277d56d2f47787a1b56c81
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufop.edu.br
_version_ 1801685716398243840