SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFOP |
dARK ID: | ark:/61566/00130000070nn |
Texto Completo: | http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/9265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1 |
Resumo: | In the last few years thousands of scientific papers have investigated sentiment analysis, several startups that measure opinions on real data have emerged and a number of innovative products related to this theme have been developed. There are multiple methods for measuring sentiments, including lexical-based and supervised machine learning methods. Despite the vast interest on the theme and wide popularity of some methods, it is unclear which one is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message. Accordingly, there is a strong need to conduct a thorough apple-to-apple comparison of sentiment analysis methods, as they are used in practice, across multiple datasets originated from different data sources. Such a comparison is key for understanding the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods. This article aims at filling this gap by presenting a benchmark comparison of twenty-four popular sentiment analysis methods (which we call the state-of-the-practice methods). Our evaluation is based on a benchmark of eighteen labeled datasets, covering messages posted on social networks, movie and product reviews, as well as opinions and comments in news articles. Our results highlight the extent to which the prediction performance of these methods varies considerably across datasets. Aiming at boosting the development of this research area, we open the methods’ codes and datasets used in this article, deploying them in a benchmark system, which provides an open API for accessing and comparing sentence-level sentiment analysis methods. |
id |
UFOP_d6a61d290611b4017651c6f23949598f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/9265 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFOP |
repository_id_str |
3233 |
spelling |
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.Sentiment analysisBenchmarkMethods evaluationIn the last few years thousands of scientific papers have investigated sentiment analysis, several startups that measure opinions on real data have emerged and a number of innovative products related to this theme have been developed. There are multiple methods for measuring sentiments, including lexical-based and supervised machine learning methods. Despite the vast interest on the theme and wide popularity of some methods, it is unclear which one is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message. Accordingly, there is a strong need to conduct a thorough apple-to-apple comparison of sentiment analysis methods, as they are used in practice, across multiple datasets originated from different data sources. Such a comparison is key for understanding the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods. This article aims at filling this gap by presenting a benchmark comparison of twenty-four popular sentiment analysis methods (which we call the state-of-the-practice methods). Our evaluation is based on a benchmark of eighteen labeled datasets, covering messages posted on social networks, movie and product reviews, as well as opinions and comments in news articles. Our results highlight the extent to which the prediction performance of these methods varies considerably across datasets. Aiming at boosting the development of this research area, we open the methods’ codes and datasets used in this article, deploying them in a benchmark system, which provides an open API for accessing and comparing sentence-level sentiment analysis methods.2018-01-18T13:32:18Z2018-01-18T13:32:18Z2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfRIBEIRO, F. N. et al. SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Science, v. 5, p. 1-29, 2016. Disponível em: <https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1?site=epjdatascience.springeropen.com>. Acesso em: 02 out. 2017.2193-1127http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/9265http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1ark:/61566/00130000070nnThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Fonte: o próprio artigo.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Filipe NunesAraújo, MatheusGonçalves, PollyannaGonçalves, Marcos AndréSouza, Fabrício Benevenuto deengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOPinstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOP2024-11-10T18:14:16Zoai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/9265Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/oai/requestrepositorio@ufop.edu.bropendoar:32332024-11-10T18:14:16Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. |
title |
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. |
spellingShingle |
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes Sentiment analysis Benchmark Methods evaluation |
title_short |
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. |
title_full |
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. |
title_fullStr |
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. |
title_full_unstemmed |
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. |
title_sort |
SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. |
author |
Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes Araújo, Matheus Gonçalves, Pollyanna Gonçalves, Marcos André Souza, Fabrício Benevenuto de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Araújo, Matheus Gonçalves, Pollyanna Gonçalves, Marcos André Souza, Fabrício Benevenuto de |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes Araújo, Matheus Gonçalves, Pollyanna Gonçalves, Marcos André Souza, Fabrício Benevenuto de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sentiment analysis Benchmark Methods evaluation |
topic |
Sentiment analysis Benchmark Methods evaluation |
description |
In the last few years thousands of scientific papers have investigated sentiment analysis, several startups that measure opinions on real data have emerged and a number of innovative products related to this theme have been developed. There are multiple methods for measuring sentiments, including lexical-based and supervised machine learning methods. Despite the vast interest on the theme and wide popularity of some methods, it is unclear which one is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message. Accordingly, there is a strong need to conduct a thorough apple-to-apple comparison of sentiment analysis methods, as they are used in practice, across multiple datasets originated from different data sources. Such a comparison is key for understanding the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods. This article aims at filling this gap by presenting a benchmark comparison of twenty-four popular sentiment analysis methods (which we call the state-of-the-practice methods). Our evaluation is based on a benchmark of eighteen labeled datasets, covering messages posted on social networks, movie and product reviews, as well as opinions and comments in news articles. Our results highlight the extent to which the prediction performance of these methods varies considerably across datasets. Aiming at boosting the development of this research area, we open the methods’ codes and datasets used in this article, deploying them in a benchmark system, which provides an open API for accessing and comparing sentence-level sentiment analysis methods. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 2018-01-18T13:32:18Z 2018-01-18T13:32:18Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
RIBEIRO, F. N. et al. SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Science, v. 5, p. 1-29, 2016. Disponível em: <https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1?site=epjdatascience.springeropen.com>. Acesso em: 02 out. 2017. 2193-1127 http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/9265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/61566/00130000070nn |
identifier_str_mv |
RIBEIRO, F. N. et al. SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Science, v. 5, p. 1-29, 2016. Disponível em: <https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1?site=epjdatascience.springeropen.com>. Acesso em: 02 out. 2017. 2193-1127 ark:/61566/00130000070nn |
url |
http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/9265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOP instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) instacron:UFOP |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
instacron_str |
UFOP |
institution |
UFOP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFOP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFOP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@ufop.edu.br |
_version_ |
1817705769270771712 |