SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Araújo, Matheus, Gonçalves, Pollyanna, Gonçalves, Marcos André, Souza, Fabrício Benevenuto de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFOP
dARK ID: ark:/61566/00130000070nn
Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/9265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1
Resumo: In the last few years thousands of scientific papers have investigated sentiment analysis, several startups that measure opinions on real data have emerged and a number of innovative products related to this theme have been developed. There are multiple methods for measuring sentiments, including lexical-based and supervised machine learning methods. Despite the vast interest on the theme and wide popularity of some methods, it is unclear which one is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message. Accordingly, there is a strong need to conduct a thorough apple-to-apple comparison of sentiment analysis methods, as they are used in practice, across multiple datasets originated from different data sources. Such a comparison is key for understanding the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods. This article aims at filling this gap by presenting a benchmark comparison of twenty-four popular sentiment analysis methods (which we call the state-of-the-practice methods). Our evaluation is based on a benchmark of eighteen labeled datasets, covering messages posted on social networks, movie and product reviews, as well as opinions and comments in news articles. Our results highlight the extent to which the prediction performance of these methods varies considerably across datasets. Aiming at boosting the development of this research area, we open the methods’ codes and datasets used in this article, deploying them in a benchmark system, which provides an open API for accessing and comparing sentence-level sentiment analysis methods.
id UFOP_d6a61d290611b4017651c6f23949598f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/9265
network_acronym_str UFOP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
repository_id_str 3233
spelling SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.Sentiment analysisBenchmarkMethods evaluationIn the last few years thousands of scientific papers have investigated sentiment analysis, several startups that measure opinions on real data have emerged and a number of innovative products related to this theme have been developed. There are multiple methods for measuring sentiments, including lexical-based and supervised machine learning methods. Despite the vast interest on the theme and wide popularity of some methods, it is unclear which one is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message. Accordingly, there is a strong need to conduct a thorough apple-to-apple comparison of sentiment analysis methods, as they are used in practice, across multiple datasets originated from different data sources. Such a comparison is key for understanding the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods. This article aims at filling this gap by presenting a benchmark comparison of twenty-four popular sentiment analysis methods (which we call the state-of-the-practice methods). Our evaluation is based on a benchmark of eighteen labeled datasets, covering messages posted on social networks, movie and product reviews, as well as opinions and comments in news articles. Our results highlight the extent to which the prediction performance of these methods varies considerably across datasets. Aiming at boosting the development of this research area, we open the methods’ codes and datasets used in this article, deploying them in a benchmark system, which provides an open API for accessing and comparing sentence-level sentiment analysis methods.2018-01-18T13:32:18Z2018-01-18T13:32:18Z2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfRIBEIRO, F. N. et al. SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Science, v. 5, p. 1-29, 2016. Disponível em: <https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1?site=epjdatascience.springeropen.com>. Acesso em: 02 out. 2017.2193-1127http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/9265http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1ark:/61566/00130000070nnThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Fonte: o próprio artigo.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Filipe NunesAraújo, MatheusGonçalves, PollyannaGonçalves, Marcos AndréSouza, Fabrício Benevenuto deengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOPinstname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)instacron:UFOP2024-11-10T18:14:16Zoai:repositorio.ufop.br:123456789/9265Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/oai/requestrepositorio@ufop.edu.bropendoar:32332024-11-10T18:14:16Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.
title SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.
spellingShingle SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.
Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes
Sentiment analysis
Benchmark
Methods evaluation
title_short SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.
title_full SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.
title_fullStr SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.
title_full_unstemmed SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.
title_sort SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods.
author Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes
author_facet Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes
Araújo, Matheus
Gonçalves, Pollyanna
Gonçalves, Marcos André
Souza, Fabrício Benevenuto de
author_role author
author2 Araújo, Matheus
Gonçalves, Pollyanna
Gonçalves, Marcos André
Souza, Fabrício Benevenuto de
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Filipe Nunes
Araújo, Matheus
Gonçalves, Pollyanna
Gonçalves, Marcos André
Souza, Fabrício Benevenuto de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sentiment analysis
Benchmark
Methods evaluation
topic Sentiment analysis
Benchmark
Methods evaluation
description In the last few years thousands of scientific papers have investigated sentiment analysis, several startups that measure opinions on real data have emerged and a number of innovative products related to this theme have been developed. There are multiple methods for measuring sentiments, including lexical-based and supervised machine learning methods. Despite the vast interest on the theme and wide popularity of some methods, it is unclear which one is better for identifying the polarity (i.e., positive or negative) of a message. Accordingly, there is a strong need to conduct a thorough apple-to-apple comparison of sentiment analysis methods, as they are used in practice, across multiple datasets originated from different data sources. Such a comparison is key for understanding the potential limitations, advantages, and disadvantages of popular methods. This article aims at filling this gap by presenting a benchmark comparison of twenty-four popular sentiment analysis methods (which we call the state-of-the-practice methods). Our evaluation is based on a benchmark of eighteen labeled datasets, covering messages posted on social networks, movie and product reviews, as well as opinions and comments in news articles. Our results highlight the extent to which the prediction performance of these methods varies considerably across datasets. Aiming at boosting the development of this research area, we open the methods’ codes and datasets used in this article, deploying them in a benchmark system, which provides an open API for accessing and comparing sentence-level sentiment analysis methods.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2018-01-18T13:32:18Z
2018-01-18T13:32:18Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv RIBEIRO, F. N. et al. SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Science, v. 5, p. 1-29, 2016. Disponível em: <https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1?site=epjdatascience.springeropen.com>. Acesso em: 02 out. 2017.
2193-1127
http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/9265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/61566/00130000070nn
identifier_str_mv RIBEIRO, F. N. et al. SentiBench - a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Science, v. 5, p. 1-29, 2016. Disponível em: <https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1?site=epjdatascience.springeropen.com>. Acesso em: 02 out. 2017.
2193-1127
ark:/61566/00130000070nn
url http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/9265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFOP
instname:Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron:UFOP
instname_str Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
instacron_str UFOP
institution UFOP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFOP
collection Repositório Institucional da UFOP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFOP - Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@ufop.edu.br
_version_ 1817705769270771712