Culture of research integrity: we are promoters

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abdon, Ana Paula
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
Texto Completo: https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/4007
Resumo: The Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion, compelled by the need of a culture which encourages integrity in research, wants to emphasize its concern, not only with the content of its publications, but also with the ethical aspects involving the submission and publication of manuscripts. By doing so, it intends to raise the discussion of best practices in scientific research, highlighting the importance of such reinforcement since the early stages of the researchers’ career. Bad ethical conducts occur as a result of growing demands of intellectual production and, consequently, the pressure upon researchers affiliated to graduate programs that use the indicators, mainly the international ones(1). The proliferation of such unethical conducts is also influenced by the existing “reward system”, in which the researcher is evaluated for its productivity. The first global event on integrity in research took place in 2007 in Lisbon(2) and sought to sensitize the scientific community and editors to the importance of promoting responsible conduct in research. In 2010, the second world conference was held in Singapore(3). From that conference emerged the “Singapore Statement on integrity in research”, bringing as integrity principles: honesty, responsibility, respect and professional impartiality, and good research management(3). In 2013, the third edition took place in Montreal, having as big thematic line the investigations that cross boundaries and the international partnerships(4). Following the example of those international movements, Brazil was also mobilized. This concern, however, is recent, and took shape after series of publications on this subject prepared by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)(5) and the publication of the Report of the Research Integrity Committee of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)(6). In parallel to those publications, two important events took place in the years 2011 and 2012 in Brazil, which addressed actions for the promotion of scientific integrity, guiding researchers and Brazilian institutions, the I and II BRISPE (Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publication Ethics)(7). In 2015, Brazil will host the “4th Annual Conference on Research Integrity” (4thWorld Conference on Research Integrity) in Rio de Janeiro, that will explore the“excellence in scientific research in its different systems”. In addition to these national movements, we highlight the importance of having scientific journals discuss their editorial policies with the scientific community, thus exercising the role of educator regarding the good practices in research and preventing misconducts, such as plagiarism, self-plagiarism, fraud, improper authorship, among others. Among those, plagiarism is gaining prominence on the international scene because of the increasing number of reports of such misconduct. In Brazil, the situation is worrying, being its proportion pointed out by renowned researcher in the field, when stated that “Brazil is among the twenty countries with the highest plagiarism and redundancy (self-plagiarism) occurrence index, which was evidenced by means of a sample of articles published in PubMed between 2008 and 2012” (8,p.1). In the guidelines of CNPq(6), it is considered plagiarism: “... presentation, as if it were of your own authorship, results or conclusions previously reached by another author, as well as full texts or a substantial part of foreign texts without the concerns that are detailed in the Guidelines.” In line with these movements, the Brazilian Association of Scientific Editors (ABEC - Associação Brasileira de Editores Científicos) promotes events and releases texts of renowned researchers in order to maintain constant debate about the quality and consolidation of publications/journals in the country, following the international standards of publishing and ethics. Ultimately, misconducts in research are subject of interest of the scientific journals, which must implement mechanisms to identify and discourage fraudulent practices in research and stimulate their integrity. Motivated by such desire, the Brazilian Journal of Health Promotion establishes, in 2015, a policy of manuscripts submission/evaluation that will involve, in addition to the inclusion of two mandatory documents, namely the project approval opinion by the ethics committee for research involving humans or animals, and the written statement of authorship, the use of antiplagiarism program in all manuscripts submitted for analysis, and thus, aims to educate authors and proliferate the idea that the published articles are in line with global ethics and integrity.
id UFOR-2_a66a138633d188ec3f9ab8dc0e18bc1c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/4007
network_acronym_str UFOR-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository_id_str
spelling Culture of research integrity: we are promotersCultura de integridade em pesquisa: somos agentes promotoresThe Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion, compelled by the need of a culture which encourages integrity in research, wants to emphasize its concern, not only with the content of its publications, but also with the ethical aspects involving the submission and publication of manuscripts. By doing so, it intends to raise the discussion of best practices in scientific research, highlighting the importance of such reinforcement since the early stages of the researchers’ career. Bad ethical conducts occur as a result of growing demands of intellectual production and, consequently, the pressure upon researchers affiliated to graduate programs that use the indicators, mainly the international ones(1). The proliferation of such unethical conducts is also influenced by the existing “reward system”, in which the researcher is evaluated for its productivity. The first global event on integrity in research took place in 2007 in Lisbon(2) and sought to sensitize the scientific community and editors to the importance of promoting responsible conduct in research. In 2010, the second world conference was held in Singapore(3). From that conference emerged the “Singapore Statement on integrity in research”, bringing as integrity principles: honesty, responsibility, respect and professional impartiality, and good research management(3). In 2013, the third edition took place in Montreal, having as big thematic line the investigations that cross boundaries and the international partnerships(4). Following the example of those international movements, Brazil was also mobilized. This concern, however, is recent, and took shape after series of publications on this subject prepared by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)(5) and the publication of the Report of the Research Integrity Committee of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)(6). In parallel to those publications, two important events took place in the years 2011 and 2012 in Brazil, which addressed actions for the promotion of scientific integrity, guiding researchers and Brazilian institutions, the I and II BRISPE (Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publication Ethics)(7). In 2015, Brazil will host the “4th Annual Conference on Research Integrity” (4thWorld Conference on Research Integrity) in Rio de Janeiro, that will explore the“excellence in scientific research in its different systems”. In addition to these national movements, we highlight the importance of having scientific journals discuss their editorial policies with the scientific community, thus exercising the role of educator regarding the good practices in research and preventing misconducts, such as plagiarism, self-plagiarism, fraud, improper authorship, among others. Among those, plagiarism is gaining prominence on the international scene because of the increasing number of reports of such misconduct. In Brazil, the situation is worrying, being its proportion pointed out by renowned researcher in the field, when stated that “Brazil is among the twenty countries with the highest plagiarism and redundancy (self-plagiarism) occurrence index, which was evidenced by means of a sample of articles published in PubMed between 2008 and 2012” (8,p.1). In the guidelines of CNPq(6), it is considered plagiarism: “... presentation, as if it were of your own authorship, results or conclusions previously reached by another author, as well as full texts or a substantial part of foreign texts without the concerns that are detailed in the Guidelines.” In line with these movements, the Brazilian Association of Scientific Editors (ABEC - Associação Brasileira de Editores Científicos) promotes events and releases texts of renowned researchers in order to maintain constant debate about the quality and consolidation of publications/journals in the country, following the international standards of publishing and ethics. Ultimately, misconducts in research are subject of interest of the scientific journals, which must implement mechanisms to identify and discourage fraudulent practices in research and stimulate their integrity. Motivated by such desire, the Brazilian Journal of Health Promotion establishes, in 2015, a policy of manuscripts submission/evaluation that will involve, in addition to the inclusion of two mandatory documents, namely the project approval opinion by the ethics committee for research involving humans or animals, and the written statement of authorship, the use of antiplagiarism program in all manuscripts submitted for analysis, and thus, aims to educate authors and proliferate the idea that the published articles are in line with global ethics and integrity.A Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde (Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion), movida pela necessidade de uma cultura que estimule a integridade em pesquisa, quer enfatizar sua preocupação, não apenas com o conteúdo de suas publicações, mas também com os aspectos éticos que envolvem a submissão e a publicação dos manuscritos. Com isso, pretende levantar a discussão sobre boas práticas em pesquisa científica, ressaltando a importância de que este reforço ocorra desde os primeiros estágios da carreira dos pesquisadores. As más condutas éticas ocorrem em virtude das exigências crescente de produção intelectual e consequentemente as pressões sobre os pesquisadores vinculados aos programas de pós-graduação que utilizam os indicadores, principalmente, internacionais(1). A proliferação destas condutas antiéticas também é influenciada pelo “sistema de recompensas” existente, no qual o pesquisador é avaliado pela sua produtividade. O primeiro evento mundial sobre a integridade em pesquisa ocorreu em 2007 na cidade de Lisboa(2) e buscou sensibilizar a comunidade científica e editores para a importância de promover a conduta responsável na pesquisa. Em 2010, houve a segunda conferência mundial em Singapura(3). Desta conferência emergiu a “Declaração de Singapura sobre integridade em pesquisa” trazendo como princípios de integridade: a honestidade, a responsabilidade, o respeito e imparcialidade profissionais e a boa gestão da pesquisa(3). Em 2013, a terceira edição ocorreu em Montreal e teve como grande linha temática as investigações que cruzam as fronteiras e as parcerias internacionais(4). A exemplo destes movimentos internacionais, o Brasil também se mobilizou. Entretanto, esta preocupação é recente e tomou corpo após séries de publicações a respeito desta temática elaborado pela Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)(5) e pela publicação do Relatório da Comissão de Integridade de Pesquisa do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)(6). Paralelo a estas publicações, dois importantes eventos ocorreram nos anos de 2011 e 2012 no Brasil que abordaram ações para promoção da integridade científica norteando pesquisadores e instituições brasileiras, o I e II Brispe (Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publication Ethics)(7). Neste ano de 2015, o Brasil sediará a “4ª Conferência Anual para Integridade da Pesquisa” (4th World Conference on Research Integrity) no Rio de Janeiro, que irá explorar a “excelência da investigação científica em seus diferentes sistemas”(8). Somado a estes movimentos nacionais, destacamos a importância de que os periódicos científicos discutam suas políticas editoriais com a comunidade científica para exercermos o papel de educador das boas práticas em pesquisa e prevenir as más condutas, como plágio, autoplágio, fraude, autoria indevida, entre outros. Dentre estes, o plágio vem ganhando destaque no cenário internacional em virtude do crescente número de relatos deste tipo de má conduta. No Brasil, a situação é preocupante, calcula-se a proporção disto quando renomado pesquisador da área afirma “o Brasil encontra-se entre os vinte países com o maior índice de ocorrência de plágio e de redundância (autoplágio) o que foi constatado por meio de uma amostra de artigos publicados na PubMed entre 2008 e 2012”(8,p.1). Nas diretrizes do CNPq(6), considera-se plágio: “...apresentação, como se fosse de sua autoria, de resultados ou conclusões anteriormente obtidos por outro autor, bem como de textos integrais ou de parte substancial de textos alheios sem os cuidados detalhados nas Diretrizes.” Em consonância com estes movimentos, a Associação Brasileira de Editores Científicos (ABEC) promove eventos e lança textos de pesquisadores renomados no intuito de manter constante debate sobre a qualidade e consolidação das publicações/periódicos editados no país, seguindo os padrões internacionais de editoração e ética. Por fim, as más condutas na pesquisa são assunto de interesse das revistas científicas, que devem implantar mecanismos que permitam identificar e desestimular as práticas fraudulentas na pesquisa e estimular sua integridade. Movida por este desejo, a Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde institui, neste ano de 2015, uma política de submissão/avaliação dos manuscritos que envolverá, além da inclusão de dois documentos obrigatórios, o parecer de aprovação do projeto em comitê de ética em pesquisa com seres humanos ou com animais e a declaração de autoria, autilização de programa antiplágio em todos os manuscritos submetidos para análise, e com isso, almeja educar autores e proliferar a ideia de que os artigos publicados estão em consonância com a ética e integridade mundiais.Universidade de Fortaleza2015-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Non-refereed Book Review""Artigo não avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/400710.5020/18061230.2015.p1Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2015); 1-4Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 28 Núm. 1 (2015); 1-4Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 28 n. 1 (2015); 1-41806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporenghttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/4007/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/4007/pdf_1Abdon, Ana Paulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-02-16T12:25:39Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/4007Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2022-02-16T12:25:39Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Culture of research integrity: we are promoters
Cultura de integridade em pesquisa: somos agentes promotores
title Culture of research integrity: we are promoters
spellingShingle Culture of research integrity: we are promoters
Abdon, Ana Paula
title_short Culture of research integrity: we are promoters
title_full Culture of research integrity: we are promoters
title_fullStr Culture of research integrity: we are promoters
title_full_unstemmed Culture of research integrity: we are promoters
title_sort Culture of research integrity: we are promoters
author Abdon, Ana Paula
author_facet Abdon, Ana Paula
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abdon, Ana Paula
description The Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion, compelled by the need of a culture which encourages integrity in research, wants to emphasize its concern, not only with the content of its publications, but also with the ethical aspects involving the submission and publication of manuscripts. By doing so, it intends to raise the discussion of best practices in scientific research, highlighting the importance of such reinforcement since the early stages of the researchers’ career. Bad ethical conducts occur as a result of growing demands of intellectual production and, consequently, the pressure upon researchers affiliated to graduate programs that use the indicators, mainly the international ones(1). The proliferation of such unethical conducts is also influenced by the existing “reward system”, in which the researcher is evaluated for its productivity. The first global event on integrity in research took place in 2007 in Lisbon(2) and sought to sensitize the scientific community and editors to the importance of promoting responsible conduct in research. In 2010, the second world conference was held in Singapore(3). From that conference emerged the “Singapore Statement on integrity in research”, bringing as integrity principles: honesty, responsibility, respect and professional impartiality, and good research management(3). In 2013, the third edition took place in Montreal, having as big thematic line the investigations that cross boundaries and the international partnerships(4). Following the example of those international movements, Brazil was also mobilized. This concern, however, is recent, and took shape after series of publications on this subject prepared by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)(5) and the publication of the Report of the Research Integrity Committee of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)(6). In parallel to those publications, two important events took place in the years 2011 and 2012 in Brazil, which addressed actions for the promotion of scientific integrity, guiding researchers and Brazilian institutions, the I and II BRISPE (Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publication Ethics)(7). In 2015, Brazil will host the “4th Annual Conference on Research Integrity” (4thWorld Conference on Research Integrity) in Rio de Janeiro, that will explore the“excellence in scientific research in its different systems”. In addition to these national movements, we highlight the importance of having scientific journals discuss their editorial policies with the scientific community, thus exercising the role of educator regarding the good practices in research and preventing misconducts, such as plagiarism, self-plagiarism, fraud, improper authorship, among others. Among those, plagiarism is gaining prominence on the international scene because of the increasing number of reports of such misconduct. In Brazil, the situation is worrying, being its proportion pointed out by renowned researcher in the field, when stated that “Brazil is among the twenty countries with the highest plagiarism and redundancy (self-plagiarism) occurrence index, which was evidenced by means of a sample of articles published in PubMed between 2008 and 2012” (8,p.1). In the guidelines of CNPq(6), it is considered plagiarism: “... presentation, as if it were of your own authorship, results or conclusions previously reached by another author, as well as full texts or a substantial part of foreign texts without the concerns that are detailed in the Guidelines.” In line with these movements, the Brazilian Association of Scientific Editors (ABEC - Associação Brasileira de Editores Científicos) promotes events and releases texts of renowned researchers in order to maintain constant debate about the quality and consolidation of publications/journals in the country, following the international standards of publishing and ethics. Ultimately, misconducts in research are subject of interest of the scientific journals, which must implement mechanisms to identify and discourage fraudulent practices in research and stimulate their integrity. Motivated by such desire, the Brazilian Journal of Health Promotion establishes, in 2015, a policy of manuscripts submission/evaluation that will involve, in addition to the inclusion of two mandatory documents, namely the project approval opinion by the ethics committee for research involving humans or animals, and the written statement of authorship, the use of antiplagiarism program in all manuscripts submitted for analysis, and thus, aims to educate authors and proliferate the idea that the published articles are in line with global ethics and integrity.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Non-refereed Book Review"
"Artigo não avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/4007
10.5020/18061230.2015.p1
url https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/4007
identifier_str_mv 10.5020/18061230.2015.p1
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/4007/pdf
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/4007/pdf_1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 28 No. 1 (2015); 1-4
Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 28 Núm. 1 (2015); 1-4
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 28 n. 1 (2015); 1-4
1806-1230
reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron:UFOR
instname_str Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron_str UFOR
institution UFOR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
collection Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798313063604027392