Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult Population
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
| Outros Autores: | , , , , |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por eng |
| Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
| Texto Completo: | https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3596 |
Resumo: | Objective: to characterize the profile of religiosity and lifestyle of an adult population and to analyze the association between these variables. Methods: Quantitative descriptive cross-sectional research conducted with participants (n=206) of two Health Fairs held in the city of São Paulo on October, 10th 2013 and May, 4th 2014. Two questionnaires were applied, The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL, subdivided into the dimensions Organizational, Non-organizational and Intrinsic Religiosity) and the FANTASTIC Lifestyle Assessment. Spearman’s Rho test was performed to associate the variables “lifestyle” and “religiosity”, and the chi-squared test was used for the bivariate analysis between sex and religiosity. Results: We found a mostly good religiosity profile in the three dimensions, particularly the Intrinsic Religiosity, which reached 83.5% (n=167) in the three questions. As to lifestyle (FANTASTIC), the following rating was obtained: 26.6% (n=34) “Good”, 48.4% (n=62) “Very Good”, and 12.5% (n=16) “Excellent”. Of the 125 bivariate analysis, 13 (11.3%) presented a weak (ρ |
| id |
UFOR-2_bad0cb075a08b2ad9b3d14d774cf71c9 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/3596 |
| network_acronym_str |
UFOR-2 |
| network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult PopulationReligiosidad y estilo de vida de una población adultaReligiosidade e estilo de vida de uma população adultaReligionSpiritualityLife StyleHealth Promotion.ReligiónEspiritualidadEstilo de VidaPromoción de la Salud.ReligiãoEspiritualidadeEstilo de VidaPromoção da Saúde.Objective: to characterize the profile of religiosity and lifestyle of an adult population and to analyze the association between these variables. Methods: Quantitative descriptive cross-sectional research conducted with participants (n=206) of two Health Fairs held in the city of São Paulo on October, 10th 2013 and May, 4th 2014. Two questionnaires were applied, The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL, subdivided into the dimensions Organizational, Non-organizational and Intrinsic Religiosity) and the FANTASTIC Lifestyle Assessment. Spearman’s Rho test was performed to associate the variables “lifestyle” and “religiosity”, and the chi-squared test was used for the bivariate analysis between sex and religiosity. Results: We found a mostly good religiosity profile in the three dimensions, particularly the Intrinsic Religiosity, which reached 83.5% (n=167) in the three questions. As to lifestyle (FANTASTIC), the following rating was obtained: 26.6% (n=34) “Good”, 48.4% (n=62) “Very Good”, and 12.5% (n=16) “Excellent”. Of the 125 bivariate analysis, 13 (11.3%) presented a weak (ρObjetivo: Caracterizar el perfil de religiosidad y estilo de vida de una población adulta y analizar la asociación entre esas variables. Métodos: Investigación descriptiva, transversal y cuantitativa realizada con participantes (n=206) de dos Férias de Salud de la ciudad de São Paulo en 20/10/2013 y 04/05/2014. Se aplicaron dos instrumentos, el Duke University Religion Index (DUREL, subdividido en las dimensiones Religiosidad Organizacional, No Organizacional e Intrínseca) y el Estilo de Vida FANTÁSTICO. Se realizaron las pruebas Rho de Spearman para la asociación de las variables “estilo de vida” y “religiosidad”, y el Cui-Cuadrado para el análisis bivariado entre el sexo y La religiosidad. Resultados: Se encontró el perfil de religiosidad en su mayoría bueno para las tres dimensiones en especial para la Religiosidad Intrínseca que alcanzo el 83,5% (n=167) em las tres cuestiones. Respecto el estilo de vida (FANTÁSTICO) se obtuvo la clasificación de: 26,6% (n=34) “Bueno”, 48,4% (n=62) “Muy Bueno” y el 12,5% (n=16) “Excelente”. De los 125 análisis bivariados, 13 (11,3%) presentaron correlación débil (ρ< 0,30) pero significativa (pObjetivo: Caracterizar o perfil de religiosidade e estilo de vida de uma população adulta e analisar a associação entre essas variáveis. Métodos: Pesquisa descritiva, transversal e quantitativa, realizada com participantes (n=206) de duas Feiras de Saúde na cidade de São Paulo, em 20/10/2013 e 04/05/2014. Aplicaram-se dois instrumentos, o Duke University Religion Index (DUREL, subdividido nas dimensões Religiosidade Organizacional, Não Organizacional e Intrínseca) e o Estilo de Vida FANTÁSTICO. Realizaram-se os testes Rho de Spearman para associação das variáveis “estilo de vida” e “religiosidade”, e Qui-Quadrado para análise bivariada entre sexo e religiosidade. Resultados: Encontrou-se perfil de religiosidade predominantemente bom nas três dimensões, com destaque para a Religiosidade Intrínseca, que alcançou 83,5% (n=167) nos três quesitos. Quanto ao estilo de vida (FANTÁSTICO), obteve-se a classificação de: 26,6% (n=34) “Bom”, 48,4% (n=62) “Muito Bom” e 12,5% (n=16) “Excelente”. Das 125 análises bivariadas, 13 (11,3%) apresentaram correlação fraca (ρ< 0,30), porém significativa (pUniversidade de Fortaleza2015-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed Article""Avaliado pelos pares""Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/359610.5020/18061230.2015.p240Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2015); 240-250Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2015); 240-250Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 28 n. 2 (2015); 240-2501806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporenghttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3596/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3596/pdf_1Cres, Marli RosangelaAbdala, Gina AndradeMeira, Maria Dyrce DiasTeixeira, Carlos AntonioNinahuaman, Maria Fernanda M. L.Moraes, Maria Cecília Leite deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-02-16T12:26:36Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/3596Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2022-02-16T12:26:36Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult Population Religiosidad y estilo de vida de una población adulta Religiosidade e estilo de vida de uma população adulta |
| title |
Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult Population |
| spellingShingle |
Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult Population Cres, Marli Rosangela Religion Spirituality Life Style Health Promotion. Religión Espiritualidad Estilo de Vida Promoción de la Salud. Religião Espiritualidade Estilo de Vida Promoção da Saúde. |
| title_short |
Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult Population |
| title_full |
Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult Population |
| title_fullStr |
Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult Population |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult Population |
| title_sort |
Religiosity and Lifestyle of an Adult Population |
| author |
Cres, Marli Rosangela |
| author_facet |
Cres, Marli Rosangela Abdala, Gina Andrade Meira, Maria Dyrce Dias Teixeira, Carlos Antonio Ninahuaman, Maria Fernanda M. L. Moraes, Maria Cecília Leite de |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Abdala, Gina Andrade Meira, Maria Dyrce Dias Teixeira, Carlos Antonio Ninahuaman, Maria Fernanda M. L. Moraes, Maria Cecília Leite de |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cres, Marli Rosangela Abdala, Gina Andrade Meira, Maria Dyrce Dias Teixeira, Carlos Antonio Ninahuaman, Maria Fernanda M. L. Moraes, Maria Cecília Leite de |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Religion Spirituality Life Style Health Promotion. Religión Espiritualidad Estilo de Vida Promoción de la Salud. Religião Espiritualidade Estilo de Vida Promoção da Saúde. |
| topic |
Religion Spirituality Life Style Health Promotion. Religión Espiritualidad Estilo de Vida Promoción de la Salud. Religião Espiritualidade Estilo de Vida Promoção da Saúde. |
| description |
Objective: to characterize the profile of religiosity and lifestyle of an adult population and to analyze the association between these variables. Methods: Quantitative descriptive cross-sectional research conducted with participants (n=206) of two Health Fairs held in the city of São Paulo on October, 10th 2013 and May, 4th 2014. Two questionnaires were applied, The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL, subdivided into the dimensions Organizational, Non-organizational and Intrinsic Religiosity) and the FANTASTIC Lifestyle Assessment. Spearman’s Rho test was performed to associate the variables “lifestyle” and “religiosity”, and the chi-squared test was used for the bivariate analysis between sex and religiosity. Results: We found a mostly good religiosity profile in the three dimensions, particularly the Intrinsic Religiosity, which reached 83.5% (n=167) in the three questions. As to lifestyle (FANTASTIC), the following rating was obtained: 26.6% (n=34) “Good”, 48.4% (n=62) “Very Good”, and 12.5% (n=16) “Excellent”. Of the 125 bivariate analysis, 13 (11.3%) presented a weak (ρ |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-29 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed Article" "Avaliado pelos pares" "Avaliado pelos pares" |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3596 10.5020/18061230.2015.p240 |
| url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3596 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/18061230.2015.p240 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
| language |
por eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3596/pdf https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/3596/pdf_1 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 28 No. 2 (2015); 240-250 Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2015); 240-250 Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 28 n. 2 (2015); 240-250 1806-1230 reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) instacron:UFOR |
| instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
| instacron_str |
UFOR |
| institution |
UFOR |
| reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
| collection |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1798313063483441152 |