Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garbin, Artênio José Ísper
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Garbin, Cléa Adas Saliba, Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba, Rovida, Tânia Adas Saliba, Diniz, Diego Garcia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
Texto Completo: https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253
Resumo: Objective: To compare two forms of scheduling clinical dental care for the oral health teams (OHT) included in the strategy of family health, regarding productive aspects of assistance. Methods: Two OHT worked concurrently, using two methods of clinical care: the parameter recommended by the Ministry of Health Ordinance No. 1101, 2002, which establishes 03 dental visits per hour (c/h) per team, and a Testing model, with 02 c/h, being each method applied for a period of 615 hours. The quantitative data was collected in OHTs’ daily production spreadsheets, covering the following items: the number of dental visits (initial, for maintenance and for emergency procedures), procedures performed, consumption of material and sterilization cycles. Data was compared and statistically analyzed through the BioStat 5.0 by applying the paired t-test (p
id UFOR-2_f64f7adb3d44f4323f0881925470104d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/2253
network_acronym_str UFOR-2
network_name_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository_id_str
spelling Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255Parâmetros assistenciais em saúde bucal: comparação entre duas programações do atendimento clínico no serviço público - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255Health ServicesFamily HealthOral HealthEfficiency OrganizationalObjective: To compare two forms of scheduling clinical dental care for the oral health teams (OHT) included in the strategy of family health, regarding productive aspects of assistance. Methods: Two OHT worked concurrently, using two methods of clinical care: the parameter recommended by the Ministry of Health Ordinance No. 1101, 2002, which establishes 03 dental visits per hour (c/h) per team, and a Testing model, with 02 c/h, being each method applied for a period of 615 hours. The quantitative data was collected in OHTs’ daily production spreadsheets, covering the following items: the number of dental visits (initial, for maintenance and for emergency procedures), procedures performed, consumption of material and sterilization cycles. Data was compared and statistically analyzed through the BioStat 5.0 by applying the paired t-test (p Comparar duas formas de programação do atendimento clínico odontológico de equipes de saúde bucal (ESB) inseridas na estratégia de saúde da família em relação aos seus aspectos produtivos assistenciais. Métodos: Duas ESB executaram, concomitantemente, duas metodologias de atendimento clínico: o parâmetro recomendado pela portaria do Ministério da Saúde Nº 1101 de 2002, que estabelece 03 consultas por hora (c/h) por equipe e um modelo Teste, com 02 c/h, sendo cada método aplicado por um período de 615 horas. Os dados quantitativos foram coletados através das planilhas de produção diária das ESB, em que constavam os seguintes itens: quantidade de consultas (iniciadas, de manutenção e de urgência), número de procedimentos executados, consumo de material e ciclos de esterilização. Os mesmos foram comparados entre os modelos e avaliados estatisticamente, através do programa Bioestat 5.0, aplicando-se o Teste t pareado (p<0,05). Resultados: No método Ministerial e no Teste, foram realizadas, respectivamente, 288 e 365 primeiras consultas, 921 e 686 consultas de manutenção, 167 e 172 consultas de urgência, com 469 e 110 faltas de pacientes, finalizando 212 e 327 tratamentos e executando 2501 e 3046 procedimentos. Dos onze itens de consumo analisados, cinco foram utilizados em menor quantidade no modelo Teste: luvas (9%), anestésico (38%), agulha anestésica (34%), fio agulhado (24%) e sugador (11%), enquanto os 06 restantes tiveram consumos semelhantes entre os modelos. Conclusão: O modelo Teste revelou-se mais produtivo e econômico.Universidade de Fortaleza2012-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed Article""Avaliado pelos pares""Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/225310.5020/2253Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2012); 255-260Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2012); 255-260Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 25 n. 3 (2012); 255-2601806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253/2481Garbin, Artênio José ÍsperGarbin, Cléa Adas SalibaMoimaz, Suzely Adas SalibaRovida, Tânia Adas SalibaDiniz, Diego Garciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-02-16T11:23:46Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/2253Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2022-02-16T11:23:46Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
Parâmetros assistenciais em saúde bucal: comparação entre duas programações do atendimento clínico no serviço público - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
title Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
spellingShingle Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
Garbin, Artênio José Ísper
Health Services
Family Health
Oral Health
Efficiency Organizational
title_short Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
title_full Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
title_fullStr Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
title_full_unstemmed Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
title_sort Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
author Garbin, Artênio José Ísper
author_facet Garbin, Artênio José Ísper
Garbin, Cléa Adas Saliba
Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
Rovida, Tânia Adas Saliba
Diniz, Diego Garcia
author_role author
author2 Garbin, Cléa Adas Saliba
Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
Rovida, Tânia Adas Saliba
Diniz, Diego Garcia
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garbin, Artênio José Ísper
Garbin, Cléa Adas Saliba
Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
Rovida, Tânia Adas Saliba
Diniz, Diego Garcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Health Services
Family Health
Oral Health
Efficiency Organizational
topic Health Services
Family Health
Oral Health
Efficiency Organizational
description Objective: To compare two forms of scheduling clinical dental care for the oral health teams (OHT) included in the strategy of family health, regarding productive aspects of assistance. Methods: Two OHT worked concurrently, using two methods of clinical care: the parameter recommended by the Ministry of Health Ordinance No. 1101, 2002, which establishes 03 dental visits per hour (c/h) per team, and a Testing model, with 02 c/h, being each method applied for a period of 615 hours. The quantitative data was collected in OHTs’ daily production spreadsheets, covering the following items: the number of dental visits (initial, for maintenance and for emergency procedures), procedures performed, consumption of material and sterilization cycles. Data was compared and statistically analyzed through the BioStat 5.0 by applying the paired t-test (p
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-11-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Peer-reviewed Article"
"Avaliado pelos pares"
"Avaliado pelos pares"
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253
10.5020/2253
url https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253
identifier_str_mv 10.5020/2253
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253/2481
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Fortaleza
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2012); 255-260
Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2012); 255-260
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 25 n. 3 (2012); 255-260
1806-1230
reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron:UFOR
instname_str Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
instacron_str UFOR
institution UFOR
reponame_str Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
collection Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798313060603002880

Registros relacionados