Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2012 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
Download full: | https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253 |
Summary: | Objective: To compare two forms of scheduling clinical dental care for the oral health teams (OHT) included in the strategy of family health, regarding productive aspects of assistance. Methods: Two OHT worked concurrently, using two methods of clinical care: the parameter recommended by the Ministry of Health Ordinance No. 1101, 2002, which establishes 03 dental visits per hour (c/h) per team, and a Testing model, with 02 c/h, being each method applied for a period of 615 hours. The quantitative data was collected in OHTs’ daily production spreadsheets, covering the following items: the number of dental visits (initial, for maintenance and for emergency procedures), procedures performed, consumption of material and sterilization cycles. Data was compared and statistically analyzed through the BioStat 5.0 by applying the paired t-test (p |
id |
UFOR-2_f64f7adb3d44f4323f0881925470104d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/2253 |
network_acronym_str |
UFOR-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255Parâmetros assistenciais em saúde bucal: comparação entre duas programações do atendimento clínico no serviço público - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255Health ServicesFamily HealthOral HealthEfficiency OrganizationalObjective: To compare two forms of scheduling clinical dental care for the oral health teams (OHT) included in the strategy of family health, regarding productive aspects of assistance. Methods: Two OHT worked concurrently, using two methods of clinical care: the parameter recommended by the Ministry of Health Ordinance No. 1101, 2002, which establishes 03 dental visits per hour (c/h) per team, and a Testing model, with 02 c/h, being each method applied for a period of 615 hours. The quantitative data was collected in OHTs’ daily production spreadsheets, covering the following items: the number of dental visits (initial, for maintenance and for emergency procedures), procedures performed, consumption of material and sterilization cycles. Data was compared and statistically analyzed through the BioStat 5.0 by applying the paired t-test (p Comparar duas formas de programação do atendimento clínico odontológico de equipes de saúde bucal (ESB) inseridas na estratégia de saúde da família em relação aos seus aspectos produtivos assistenciais. Métodos: Duas ESB executaram, concomitantemente, duas metodologias de atendimento clínico: o parâmetro recomendado pela portaria do Ministério da Saúde Nº 1101 de 2002, que estabelece 03 consultas por hora (c/h) por equipe e um modelo Teste, com 02 c/h, sendo cada método aplicado por um período de 615 horas. Os dados quantitativos foram coletados através das planilhas de produção diária das ESB, em que constavam os seguintes itens: quantidade de consultas (iniciadas, de manutenção e de urgência), número de procedimentos executados, consumo de material e ciclos de esterilização. Os mesmos foram comparados entre os modelos e avaliados estatisticamente, através do programa Bioestat 5.0, aplicando-se o Teste t pareado (p<0,05). Resultados: No método Ministerial e no Teste, foram realizadas, respectivamente, 288 e 365 primeiras consultas, 921 e 686 consultas de manutenção, 167 e 172 consultas de urgência, com 469 e 110 faltas de pacientes, finalizando 212 e 327 tratamentos e executando 2501 e 3046 procedimentos. Dos onze itens de consumo analisados, cinco foram utilizados em menor quantidade no modelo Teste: luvas (9%), anestésico (38%), agulha anestésica (34%), fio agulhado (24%) e sugador (11%), enquanto os 06 restantes tiveram consumos semelhantes entre os modelos. Conclusão: O modelo Teste revelou-se mais produtivo e econômico.Universidade de Fortaleza2012-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Peer-reviewed Article""Avaliado pelos pares""Avaliado pelos pares"application/pdfhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/225310.5020/2253Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2012); 255-260Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2012); 255-260Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 25 n. 3 (2012); 255-2601806-1230reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúdeinstname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)instacron:UFORporhttps://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253/2481Garbin, Artênio José ÍsperGarbin, Cléa Adas SalibaMoimaz, Suzely Adas SalibaRovida, Tânia Adas SalibaDiniz, Diego Garciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-02-16T11:23:46Zoai:ojs.ojs.unifor.br:article/2253Revistahttps://periodicos.unifor.br/RBPS/oai1806-12301806-1222opendoar:2022-02-16T11:23:46Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255 Parâmetros assistenciais em saúde bucal: comparação entre duas programações do atendimento clínico no serviço público - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255 |
title |
Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255 |
spellingShingle |
Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255 Garbin, Artênio José Ísper Health Services Family Health Oral Health Efficiency Organizational |
title_short |
Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255 |
title_full |
Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255 |
title_fullStr |
Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255 |
title_sort |
Oral health care parameters: comparison between two methods of scheduling clinical dental care in the public service - doi: 10.5020/18061230.2012.p255 |
author |
Garbin, Artênio José Ísper |
author_facet |
Garbin, Artênio José Ísper Garbin, Cléa Adas Saliba Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba Rovida, Tânia Adas Saliba Diniz, Diego Garcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Garbin, Cléa Adas Saliba Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba Rovida, Tânia Adas Saliba Diniz, Diego Garcia |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garbin, Artênio José Ísper Garbin, Cléa Adas Saliba Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba Rovida, Tânia Adas Saliba Diniz, Diego Garcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health Services Family Health Oral Health Efficiency Organizational |
topic |
Health Services Family Health Oral Health Efficiency Organizational |
description |
Objective: To compare two forms of scheduling clinical dental care for the oral health teams (OHT) included in the strategy of family health, regarding productive aspects of assistance. Methods: Two OHT worked concurrently, using two methods of clinical care: the parameter recommended by the Ministry of Health Ordinance No. 1101, 2002, which establishes 03 dental visits per hour (c/h) per team, and a Testing model, with 02 c/h, being each method applied for a period of 615 hours. The quantitative data was collected in OHTs’ daily production spreadsheets, covering the following items: the number of dental visits (initial, for maintenance and for emergency procedures), procedures performed, consumption of material and sterilization cycles. Data was compared and statistically analyzed through the BioStat 5.0 by applying the paired t-test (p |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-11-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion "Peer-reviewed Article" "Avaliado pelos pares" "Avaliado pelos pares" |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253 10.5020/2253 |
url |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5020/2253 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.unifor.br/RBPS/article/view/2253/2481 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de Fortaleza |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal in Health Promotion; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2012); 255-260 Revista Brasileña en Promoción de la Salud; Vol. 25 Núm. 3 (2012); 255-260 Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde; v. 25 n. 3 (2012); 255-260 1806-1230 reponame:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde instname:Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) instacron:UFOR |
instname_str |
Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
instacron_str |
UFOR |
institution |
UFOR |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
collection |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde - Universidade de Fortaleza (Unifor) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808844178370592768 |