An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Drummond, José Augusto Leitão
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Franco, José Luiz de Andrade, de Oliveira, Daniela
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829
Resumo: This is a second overview of the Brazilian conservation unit system for mid-2010. It updates author et al, 2009. It examines six dimensions of federal and state protected areas – age, numbers, types of units, absolute and average sizes, distribution by states and biomes, and degree of compliance with CBD-inspired goals. Major findings: (i) the system maintained a rapid growth rate; (ii) national parks and national forests are the most prominent units; (iii) distribution of units by region and biome remains unbalanced; (iv) state units grew remarkably over the last five years; (v) state units are biased towards sustainable use; (vi) sustainable use units grew more than fully protected units; (vii) Amazonia remains the most extensively protected biome; and (viii) quantitative goals of biome protection are closer to being reached. In 2010 Brazil held the fourth position globally in protected areas; it created the largest number of units between 2000 and 2010; it has the largest combined area of protected tropical formations. However, several regions and biomes remain under protected. 
id UFPA-2_bc9ea05eee7b69812d1d67b439c807a9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufpa.br:article/10829
network_acronym_str UFPA-2
network_name_str Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second lookThis is a second overview of the Brazilian conservation unit system for mid-2010. It updates author et al, 2009. It examines six dimensions of federal and state protected areas – age, numbers, types of units, absolute and average sizes, distribution by states and biomes, and degree of compliance with CBD-inspired goals. Major findings: (i) the system maintained a rapid growth rate; (ii) national parks and national forests are the most prominent units; (iii) distribution of units by region and biome remains unbalanced; (iv) state units grew remarkably over the last five years; (v) state units are biased towards sustainable use; (vi) sustainable use units grew more than fully protected units; (vii) Amazonia remains the most extensively protected biome; and (viii) quantitative goals of biome protection are closer to being reached. In 2010 Brazil held the fourth position globally in protected areas; it created the largest number of units between 2000 and 2010; it has the largest combined area of protected tropical formations. However, several regions and biomes remain under protected. Núcleo de Altos Estudos AmazônicosDrummond, José Augusto LeitãoFranco, José Luiz de Andradede Oliveira, Daniela2012-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/1082910.5801/ncn.v15i1.10829Novos Cadernos NAEA; v. 15, n. 1 (2012)2179-75361516-6481reponame:Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)instacron:UFPAenghttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829/7462Direitos autorais 2016 Novos Cadernos NAEAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-04T18:38:30Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufpa.br:article/10829Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncnPUBhttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/oairevistanovoscadernosnaea@gmail.com||revistancnaea@ufpa.br2179-75361516-6481opendoar:2021-08-04T18:38:30Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online) - Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look
title An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look
spellingShingle An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look
Drummond, José Augusto Leitão
title_short An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look
title_full An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look
title_fullStr An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look
title_sort An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look
author Drummond, José Augusto Leitão
author_facet Drummond, José Augusto Leitão
Franco, José Luiz de Andrade
de Oliveira, Daniela
author_role author
author2 Franco, José Luiz de Andrade
de Oliveira, Daniela
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Drummond, José Augusto Leitão
Franco, José Luiz de Andrade
de Oliveira, Daniela
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
description This is a second overview of the Brazilian conservation unit system for mid-2010. It updates author et al, 2009. It examines six dimensions of federal and state protected areas – age, numbers, types of units, absolute and average sizes, distribution by states and biomes, and degree of compliance with CBD-inspired goals. Major findings: (i) the system maintained a rapid growth rate; (ii) national parks and national forests are the most prominent units; (iii) distribution of units by region and biome remains unbalanced; (iv) state units grew remarkably over the last five years; (v) state units are biased towards sustainable use; (vi) sustainable use units grew more than fully protected units; (vii) Amazonia remains the most extensively protected biome; and (viii) quantitative goals of biome protection are closer to being reached. In 2010 Brazil held the fourth position globally in protected areas; it created the largest number of units between 2000 and 2010; it has the largest combined area of protected tropical formations. However, several regions and biomes remain under protected. 
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829
10.5801/ncn.v15i1.10829
url https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829
identifier_str_mv 10.5801/ncn.v15i1.10829
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829/7462
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Novos Cadernos NAEA
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Novos Cadernos NAEA
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Novos Cadernos NAEA; v. 15, n. 1 (2012)
2179-7536
1516-6481
reponame:Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
instacron:UFPA
instname_str Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
instacron_str UFPA
institution UFPA
reponame_str Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online)
collection Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online) - Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistanovoscadernosnaea@gmail.com||revistancnaea@ufpa.br
_version_ 1799711020796608512