An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829 |
Resumo: | This is a second overview of the Brazilian conservation unit system for mid-2010. It updates author et al, 2009. It examines six dimensions of federal and state protected areas – age, numbers, types of units, absolute and average sizes, distribution by states and biomes, and degree of compliance with CBD-inspired goals. Major findings: (i) the system maintained a rapid growth rate; (ii) national parks and national forests are the most prominent units; (iii) distribution of units by region and biome remains unbalanced; (iv) state units grew remarkably over the last five years; (v) state units are biased towards sustainable use; (vi) sustainable use units grew more than fully protected units; (vii) Amazonia remains the most extensively protected biome; and (viii) quantitative goals of biome protection are closer to being reached. In 2010 Brazil held the fourth position globally in protected areas; it created the largest number of units between 2000 and 2010; it has the largest combined area of protected tropical formations. However, several regions and biomes remain under protected. |
id |
UFPA-2_bc9ea05eee7b69812d1d67b439c807a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufpa.br:article/10829 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPA-2 |
network_name_str |
Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second lookThis is a second overview of the Brazilian conservation unit system for mid-2010. It updates author et al, 2009. It examines six dimensions of federal and state protected areas – age, numbers, types of units, absolute and average sizes, distribution by states and biomes, and degree of compliance with CBD-inspired goals. Major findings: (i) the system maintained a rapid growth rate; (ii) national parks and national forests are the most prominent units; (iii) distribution of units by region and biome remains unbalanced; (iv) state units grew remarkably over the last five years; (v) state units are biased towards sustainable use; (vi) sustainable use units grew more than fully protected units; (vii) Amazonia remains the most extensively protected biome; and (viii) quantitative goals of biome protection are closer to being reached. In 2010 Brazil held the fourth position globally in protected areas; it created the largest number of units between 2000 and 2010; it has the largest combined area of protected tropical formations. However, several regions and biomes remain under protected. Núcleo de Altos Estudos AmazônicosDrummond, José Augusto LeitãoFranco, José Luiz de Andradede Oliveira, Daniela2012-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/1082910.5801/ncn.v15i1.10829Novos Cadernos NAEA; v. 15, n. 1 (2012)2179-75361516-6481reponame:Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)instacron:UFPAenghttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829/7462Direitos autorais 2016 Novos Cadernos NAEAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-04T18:38:30Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufpa.br:article/10829Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncnPUBhttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/oairevistanovoscadernosnaea@gmail.com||revistancnaea@ufpa.br2179-75361516-6481opendoar:2021-08-04T18:38:30Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online) - Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look |
title |
An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look |
spellingShingle |
An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look Drummond, José Augusto Leitão |
title_short |
An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look |
title_full |
An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look |
title_fullStr |
An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look |
title_full_unstemmed |
An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look |
title_sort |
An assessment of Brazilian conservation units – a second look |
author |
Drummond, José Augusto Leitão |
author_facet |
Drummond, José Augusto Leitão Franco, José Luiz de Andrade de Oliveira, Daniela |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Franco, José Luiz de Andrade de Oliveira, Daniela |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Drummond, José Augusto Leitão Franco, José Luiz de Andrade de Oliveira, Daniela |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
description |
This is a second overview of the Brazilian conservation unit system for mid-2010. It updates author et al, 2009. It examines six dimensions of federal and state protected areas – age, numbers, types of units, absolute and average sizes, distribution by states and biomes, and degree of compliance with CBD-inspired goals. Major findings: (i) the system maintained a rapid growth rate; (ii) national parks and national forests are the most prominent units; (iii) distribution of units by region and biome remains unbalanced; (iv) state units grew remarkably over the last five years; (v) state units are biased towards sustainable use; (vi) sustainable use units grew more than fully protected units; (vii) Amazonia remains the most extensively protected biome; and (viii) quantitative goals of biome protection are closer to being reached. In 2010 Brazil held the fourth position globally in protected areas; it created the largest number of units between 2000 and 2010; it has the largest combined area of protected tropical formations. However, several regions and biomes remain under protected. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-08-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829 10.5801/ncn.v15i1.10829 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5801/ncn.v15i1.10829 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/ncn/article/view/10829/7462 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Novos Cadernos NAEA info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Novos Cadernos NAEA |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Novos Cadernos NAEA; v. 15, n. 1 (2012) 2179-7536 1516-6481 reponame:Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA) instacron:UFPA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA) |
instacron_str |
UFPA |
institution |
UFPA |
reponame_str |
Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online) |
collection |
Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Novos Cadernos NAEA (Online) - Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistanovoscadernosnaea@gmail.com||revistancnaea@ufpa.br |
_version_ |
1799711020796608512 |