METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Livania Norberta
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Cunha, Lucio Sobral, Pereira, Eugênia, Cruz, Maria Lucia Brito
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Geoamazônia
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/geoamazonia/article/view/13399
Resumo: The determination of resilience capacity constitutes an important tool for environmental conservation and preservation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the environmental resilience capacity of the lower course of the basin of the Poti River (LCPR) in the state of Piauí in northeastern Brazil. For such, analyses were performed of the natural and socioeconomic aspects of the area. A geographic information system was used for interpreting the lower Poti River and identifying the main existing environmental risks. The images were edited using SPRING 5.2 and ARCMAP 10.3. Environmental resilience capacity was determined by calculating an environmental resilience index (ERI) based on two additional indexes: the natural resilience index (NRI) and the municipal social vulnerability index (MSVI). Environmental resilience capacity was low in the urban areas of the river due to the greater pressure on the environment as a result of demographic density and the exploitation of natural resources. In contrast, rural areas (86 percent of LCRP) showed a moderate-to-high degree of environmental resilience, due to the occurrence of large areas predominantly covered with natural vegetation. The municipal social vulnerability index reflects the various public strategies adopted by administrators. Another finding was that the method developed for evaluating environmental resilience based on the analysis of natural resilience and social vulnerability is important to the planning and management of river basins in terms of the sustainable development of its uses in different geographic areas. KEYWORDS: Vulnerability; Resilience; Hydrographic basin; Sustainability
id UFPA-3_39c983864747567245e5025e68b05930
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufpa.br:article/13399
network_acronym_str UFPA-3
network_name_str Revista Geoamazônia
repository_id_str
spelling METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDSThe determination of resilience capacity constitutes an important tool for environmental conservation and preservation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the environmental resilience capacity of the lower course of the basin of the Poti River (LCPR) in the state of Piauí in northeastern Brazil. For such, analyses were performed of the natural and socioeconomic aspects of the area. A geographic information system was used for interpreting the lower Poti River and identifying the main existing environmental risks. The images were edited using SPRING 5.2 and ARCMAP 10.3. Environmental resilience capacity was determined by calculating an environmental resilience index (ERI) based on two additional indexes: the natural resilience index (NRI) and the municipal social vulnerability index (MSVI). Environmental resilience capacity was low in the urban areas of the river due to the greater pressure on the environment as a result of demographic density and the exploitation of natural resources. In contrast, rural areas (86 percent of LCRP) showed a moderate-to-high degree of environmental resilience, due to the occurrence of large areas predominantly covered with natural vegetation. The municipal social vulnerability index reflects the various public strategies adopted by administrators. Another finding was that the method developed for evaluating environmental resilience based on the analysis of natural resilience and social vulnerability is important to the planning and management of river basins in terms of the sustainable development of its uses in different geographic areas. KEYWORDS: Vulnerability; Resilience; Hydrographic basin; SustainabilityUniversidade Federal do ParáThe authors are grateful to the Brazilian fostering agencies FACEPE and CAPES for the doctoral grants awarded to the first author and CNPq for the Research Productivity grant awarded to the last author.Oliveira, Livania NorbertaCunha, Lucio SobralPereira, EugêniaCruz, Maria Lucia Brito2022-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/geoamazonia/article/view/1339910.18542/geo.v10i19.13399Revista GeoAmazônia; v. 10, n. 19 (2022): Revista GeoAmazônia & Resumos Expandidos do II Falas Geográficas; 01-222358-17781980-7759reponame:Revista Geoamazôniainstname:Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)instacron:UFPAporhttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/geoamazonia/article/view/13399/9320/*ref*/Adger, W.N., Hughes, T.P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., Rockström, J., 2005. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science. 309(1), pp.1036–1039. Burkhard, B., Fath, B.D., Müller, M., 2011. Adapting the adaptive cycle: hypotheses on the development of ecosystem properties and services. Ecol. Model. 222, pp.2878–2890. Chapin, F.S., Peterson, G., Berkes, F., Callaghan, T.V., Angelstam, P., Apps, M., Beier, C., Bergeron, Y., Crépin, A.S., Danell, Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Forbes, B., Fresco, N., Juday, G., Niemelä, J., Shvidenko, A., Whiteman, G., 2004. Resilience and vulnerability of northern regions to social and environmental change. AMBIO. 33, pp.344–349./*ref*/Costa, S.S.L; Moraes , M.V.A.R.; Portela , J.P., 2015. Geoenvironmental compartmentalization of the municipality of Demerval Lobão, Piauí. REGNE. 1, pp.21-37. Cumming, G.S., 2011. Spatial Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg/New York. Cunha, L., Mendes, J.M., Tavares, A., Freiria, S., 2011. Construção de modelos de avaliação de vulnerabilidade social a riscos naturais e tecnológicos. O desafio das escalas. In: Santos, N., Cunha, L. (Eds.), Trunfos de uma Geografia Activa: Desenvolvimento Local, Ambiente, Ordenamento e Tecnologia. IUC, Coimbra, pp. 627-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/978-989- 26-0244-8_71 Cutter, S.L., 2003. The Vulnerability of Science and the Science of Vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 93, pp.1-12. Cutter, S.L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., Webb, J., 2008. A placebased model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change.18, pp.598–606. Cutter, S. L., 2011. A ciência da vulnerabilidade: modelos, métodos e indicadores. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais. 93, pp.59-69. Delamare, T.O.; Sato, S.E.; Simon, A.L.H., 2017. Análise da cobertura e uso da terra da colônia de pescadores Z3 – Pelotas (RS): elementos para o zoneamento geoambiental. In: Pereza-Filho, A., Amorim, R.R. (Eds.), Os desafios da geografia física na fronteira do conhecimento. Campinas, UNICAMP, pp. 2733-2744. Evans, J.P., 2011. Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 36, pp.223–237. Fiksel, J. 2003. Designing resilient, sustainable, systems. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, pp.5330–5339. Fiksel, J. 2006. Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 2(2), pp.14–21. Francis J.L., Li, L., Janzen, H.H., Angers, D.A., Olson, B.M., 2016. Soil quality attributes, soil resilience, and legacy effects following topsoil removal and one-time amendments. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 96, pp.177-190./*ref*/Francis, R., Bekera, B.2014. A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 121, pp.90-103. Folke, C., 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change. 16(3), pp.253–267. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Available in: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/, Censo demográfico de 2010. [Accessed 12, July, 2015] IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Available in: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/66/pam_2016_v43_br.pdf , Produção Agrícola Municipal 2016. [Accessed July 2017] Klein, R.J.T., Nicholls, R.J., Thomalla, F., 2003. Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Environmental Hazards, 5, 35–45. Holling, C.S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, pp.1–23. Laliberté, E., Legendre, P., 2010. A distance?based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology, 91, pp.299-305. Lima, I.M.M.F.; Augustin, C.H.R.R., 2014. Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Poti: dinâmica e morfologia do canal principal no trecho do baixo curso. X Simpósio Nacional de Geomorfologia. Manaus, Amazônia. Melo, E.T; Sales, M.C.L.; Oliveira, J.G.B., 2011. Aplicação do índice de vegetação por diferença normalizada (NDVI) para análise da degradação ambiental da microbacia hidrográfica do riacho dos cavalos, Crateús-CE. RAEGA - o espaço geográfico em análise, 23, PP.520-533. Mendes, J.; Tavares, A.O.; Cunha, L.; Freiria, S., 2011. A vulnerabilidade social aos perigos naturais e tecnológicos em Portugal. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 93, PP.95-128. Mu, D., Seager, T.P, Rao, P.S.C., Park, J., Zhao, F., 2011. A resilience perspective on biofuel production. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7, pp.348–359. Müller, F., Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., 2010 a. Resilience, integrity and ecosystem dynamics: bridging ecosystem theory and management. In: Otto, J.C., Dikau, R. (Eds.), Landform– Structure, Evolution, Process Control. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences Series, Springer, 115, pp.221–242./*ref*/Müller, J. Noss, F.S., Bussler, H., Brandl, R., 2010 b. Learning from a “benign neglect strategy” in a national park: response of saproxylic beetles to dead wood accumulation. Biol. Conserv. 143, pp.2559–2569. Müller, F., Bergmann, M., Dannowski, D., Dippner, J.W., Gnauck, A., Haase, P. Jochimsen, M.C., Kasprzak, P., Kröncke, I., Kümmerlin, R., Küster, M., Meesenburg, H., Merz, C., Millat, G., Müller, J., Padisák, J., Schimming, C.G., Theuerkauf, M., 2016. Assessing resilience in long-termecological data sets. Ecological Indicators. 65, pp.10–43. Oliveira, L. N., & Aquino, C. M. S. de. (2020). Definições e aplicações da resiliência na ciência geográfica. Revista Do Departamento De Geografia, 39, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11606/rdg.v39i0.159581 Ponce-Campos, G.E., Moran, M.S., Huete, A., Zhang, Y., Bresloff, C., Huxman, T.E; Eamus, D., Bosch, D.D., Buda, A.R., Gunter, S.A., Scalley, T.H., Kitchen, S.G., McClaran, M.P., McNab, W,H., Montoya, D.S., Morgan, J.A., Peters, D.P., Sadler, E.J., Seyfried, M.S., Starks, P.J., 2013. Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions. Nature. 494, PP.349-352. Ramos, A., Cunha, L., Cunha, P.P., 2014. Application de la Méthode de l’Analyse Multicritère Hiérarchique à l’étude des glissements de terrain dans la région littorale du centre du Portugal: Figueira da Foz – Nazaré. Geo-Eco-Trop. 38, pp.33-44. Santos, F.A.; Aquino, C.M.S., 2015. Estimativa da erodibilidade dos solos em área suscetível à desertificação, no estado do Piauí: o caso dos municípios de Castelo do Piauí e Juazeiro do Piauí. Revista GeoPantanal. 10, pp.101-111. Tricart, J., 1977. Ecodinâmica. IBGE-SUPREN, Recursos Naturais e Meio Ambiente. Rio de Janeiro. 97. Vital, M.H.F., 2007. Impacto Ambiental de Florestas de Eucalipto. Revista do BNDES. 14, pp.235-276. Vogel, A., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Weigelt, A., 2012. Grassland Resistance and Resilience after Drought Depends on Management Intensity and Species Richness. PLoS ONE 7, (5) e36992.Direitos autorais 2022 Revista GeoAmazôniainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-10-14T22:58:22Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufpa.br:article/13399Revistahttp://www.geoamazonia.net/index.php/revistaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/geoamazonia/oairevistageoamazoniabrasil@gmail.com2358-17781980-7759opendoar:2022-10-14T22:58:22Revista Geoamazônia - Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDS
title METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDS
spellingShingle METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDS
Oliveira, Livania Norberta
title_short METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDS
title_full METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDS
title_fullStr METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDS
title_full_unstemmed METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDS
title_sort METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO DETERMINE THE CAPACITY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCE IN WATERSHEDS
author Oliveira, Livania Norberta
author_facet Oliveira, Livania Norberta
Cunha, Lucio Sobral
Pereira, Eugênia
Cruz, Maria Lucia Brito
author_role author
author2 Cunha, Lucio Sobral
Pereira, Eugênia
Cruz, Maria Lucia Brito
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv The authors are grateful to the Brazilian fostering agencies FACEPE and CAPES for the doctoral grants awarded to the first author and CNPq for the Research Productivity grant awarded to the last author.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Livania Norberta
Cunha, Lucio Sobral
Pereira, Eugênia
Cruz, Maria Lucia Brito
description The determination of resilience capacity constitutes an important tool for environmental conservation and preservation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the environmental resilience capacity of the lower course of the basin of the Poti River (LCPR) in the state of Piauí in northeastern Brazil. For such, analyses were performed of the natural and socioeconomic aspects of the area. A geographic information system was used for interpreting the lower Poti River and identifying the main existing environmental risks. The images were edited using SPRING 5.2 and ARCMAP 10.3. Environmental resilience capacity was determined by calculating an environmental resilience index (ERI) based on two additional indexes: the natural resilience index (NRI) and the municipal social vulnerability index (MSVI). Environmental resilience capacity was low in the urban areas of the river due to the greater pressure on the environment as a result of demographic density and the exploitation of natural resources. In contrast, rural areas (86 percent of LCRP) showed a moderate-to-high degree of environmental resilience, due to the occurrence of large areas predominantly covered with natural vegetation. The municipal social vulnerability index reflects the various public strategies adopted by administrators. Another finding was that the method developed for evaluating environmental resilience based on the analysis of natural resilience and social vulnerability is important to the planning and management of river basins in terms of the sustainable development of its uses in different geographic areas. KEYWORDS: Vulnerability; Resilience; Hydrographic basin; Sustainability
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/geoamazonia/article/view/13399
10.18542/geo.v10i19.13399
url https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/geoamazonia/article/view/13399
identifier_str_mv 10.18542/geo.v10i19.13399
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpa.br/index.php/geoamazonia/article/view/13399/9320
/*ref*/Adger, W.N., Hughes, T.P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., Rockström, J., 2005. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science. 309(1), pp.1036–1039. Burkhard, B., Fath, B.D., Müller, M., 2011. Adapting the adaptive cycle: hypotheses on the development of ecosystem properties and services. Ecol. Model. 222, pp.2878–2890. Chapin, F.S., Peterson, G., Berkes, F., Callaghan, T.V., Angelstam, P., Apps, M., Beier, C., Bergeron, Y., Crépin, A.S., Danell, Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Forbes, B., Fresco, N., Juday, G., Niemelä, J., Shvidenko, A., Whiteman, G., 2004. Resilience and vulnerability of northern regions to social and environmental change. AMBIO. 33, pp.344–349.
/*ref*/Costa, S.S.L; Moraes , M.V.A.R.; Portela , J.P., 2015. Geoenvironmental compartmentalization of the municipality of Demerval Lobão, Piauí. REGNE. 1, pp.21-37. Cumming, G.S., 2011. Spatial Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg/New York. Cunha, L., Mendes, J.M., Tavares, A., Freiria, S., 2011. Construção de modelos de avaliação de vulnerabilidade social a riscos naturais e tecnológicos. O desafio das escalas. In: Santos, N., Cunha, L. (Eds.), Trunfos de uma Geografia Activa: Desenvolvimento Local, Ambiente, Ordenamento e Tecnologia. IUC, Coimbra, pp. 627-637. http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/978-989- 26-0244-8_71 Cutter, S.L., 2003. The Vulnerability of Science and the Science of Vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 93, pp.1-12. Cutter, S.L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., Webb, J., 2008. A placebased model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change.18, pp.598–606. Cutter, S. L., 2011. A ciência da vulnerabilidade: modelos, métodos e indicadores. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais. 93, pp.59-69. Delamare, T.O.; Sato, S.E.; Simon, A.L.H., 2017. Análise da cobertura e uso da terra da colônia de pescadores Z3 – Pelotas (RS): elementos para o zoneamento geoambiental. In: Pereza-Filho, A., Amorim, R.R. (Eds.), Os desafios da geografia física na fronteira do conhecimento. Campinas, UNICAMP, pp. 2733-2744. Evans, J.P., 2011. Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 36, pp.223–237. Fiksel, J. 2003. Designing resilient, sustainable, systems. Environmental Science and Technology, 37, pp.5330–5339. Fiksel, J. 2006. Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 2(2), pp.14–21. Francis J.L., Li, L., Janzen, H.H., Angers, D.A., Olson, B.M., 2016. Soil quality attributes, soil resilience, and legacy effects following topsoil removal and one-time amendments. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 96, pp.177-190.
/*ref*/Francis, R., Bekera, B.2014. A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 121, pp.90-103. Folke, C., 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change. 16(3), pp.253–267. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Available in: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/, Censo demográfico de 2010. [Accessed 12, July, 2015] IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Available in: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/periodicos/66/pam_2016_v43_br.pdf , Produção Agrícola Municipal 2016. [Accessed July 2017] Klein, R.J.T., Nicholls, R.J., Thomalla, F., 2003. Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Environmental Hazards, 5, 35–45. Holling, C.S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, pp.1–23. Laliberté, E., Legendre, P., 2010. A distance?based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology, 91, pp.299-305. Lima, I.M.M.F.; Augustin, C.H.R.R., 2014. Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Poti: dinâmica e morfologia do canal principal no trecho do baixo curso. X Simpósio Nacional de Geomorfologia. Manaus, Amazônia. Melo, E.T; Sales, M.C.L.; Oliveira, J.G.B., 2011. Aplicação do índice de vegetação por diferença normalizada (NDVI) para análise da degradação ambiental da microbacia hidrográfica do riacho dos cavalos, Crateús-CE. RAEGA - o espaço geográfico em análise, 23, PP.520-533. Mendes, J.; Tavares, A.O.; Cunha, L.; Freiria, S., 2011. A vulnerabilidade social aos perigos naturais e tecnológicos em Portugal. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 93, PP.95-128. Mu, D., Seager, T.P, Rao, P.S.C., Park, J., Zhao, F., 2011. A resilience perspective on biofuel production. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7, pp.348–359. Müller, F., Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., 2010 a. Resilience, integrity and ecosystem dynamics: bridging ecosystem theory and management. In: Otto, J.C., Dikau, R. (Eds.), Landform– Structure, Evolution, Process Control. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences Series, Springer, 115, pp.221–242.
/*ref*/Müller, J. Noss, F.S., Bussler, H., Brandl, R., 2010 b. Learning from a “benign neglect strategy” in a national park: response of saproxylic beetles to dead wood accumulation. Biol. Conserv. 143, pp.2559–2569. Müller, F., Bergmann, M., Dannowski, D., Dippner, J.W., Gnauck, A., Haase, P. Jochimsen, M.C., Kasprzak, P., Kröncke, I., Kümmerlin, R., Küster, M., Meesenburg, H., Merz, C., Millat, G., Müller, J., Padisák, J., Schimming, C.G., Theuerkauf, M., 2016. Assessing resilience in long-termecological data sets. Ecological Indicators. 65, pp.10–43. Oliveira, L. N., & Aquino, C. M. S. de. (2020). Definições e aplicações da resiliência na ciência geográfica. Revista Do Departamento De Geografia, 39, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11606/rdg.v39i0.159581 Ponce-Campos, G.E., Moran, M.S., Huete, A., Zhang, Y., Bresloff, C., Huxman, T.E; Eamus, D., Bosch, D.D., Buda, A.R., Gunter, S.A., Scalley, T.H., Kitchen, S.G., McClaran, M.P., McNab, W,H., Montoya, D.S., Morgan, J.A., Peters, D.P., Sadler, E.J., Seyfried, M.S., Starks, P.J., 2013. Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions. Nature. 494, PP.349-352. Ramos, A., Cunha, L., Cunha, P.P., 2014. Application de la Méthode de l’Analyse Multicritère Hiérarchique à l’étude des glissements de terrain dans la région littorale du centre du Portugal: Figueira da Foz – Nazaré. Geo-Eco-Trop. 38, pp.33-44. Santos, F.A.; Aquino, C.M.S., 2015. Estimativa da erodibilidade dos solos em área suscetível à desertificação, no estado do Piauí: o caso dos municípios de Castelo do Piauí e Juazeiro do Piauí. Revista GeoPantanal. 10, pp.101-111. Tricart, J., 1977. Ecodinâmica. IBGE-SUPREN, Recursos Naturais e Meio Ambiente. Rio de Janeiro. 97. Vital, M.H.F., 2007. Impacto Ambiental de Florestas de Eucalipto. Revista do BNDES. 14, pp.235-276. Vogel, A., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Weigelt, A., 2012. Grassland Resistance and Resilience after Drought Depends on Management Intensity and Species Richness. PLoS ONE 7, (5) e36992.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2022 Revista GeoAmazônia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2022 Revista GeoAmazônia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Pará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Pará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista GeoAmazônia; v. 10, n. 19 (2022): Revista GeoAmazônia & Resumos Expandidos do II Falas Geográficas; 01-22
2358-1778
1980-7759
reponame:Revista Geoamazônia
instname:Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
instacron:UFPA
instname_str Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
instacron_str UFPA
institution UFPA
reponame_str Revista Geoamazônia
collection Revista Geoamazônia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Geoamazônia - Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistageoamazoniabrasil@gmail.com
_version_ 1788989934257831936

Registros relacionados