Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/11555 |
Resumo: | The contemporary deontic logic uses besides of the deontic operators obligatory, permitted e forbidden also modern symbolic and mathematical techniques in the analysis of normative discourses. In that sense, given the complexity of this type of discourse, even today, a series of s questions are raised, as follows here: (i) What is the meaning of the expression “to be obligatory”? (ii) What is obligatory is the case?, (iii) What is the case, is permitted?, (iv) Can we consider deontic logic as a mere extension of modal logic, i.e. is it possible to convert all modal axioms into deontic axioms (equally valid)?, (v) The “possible worlds semantics” proposed by Kripke allows us to interpret adequately, or even intuitively, deontic propositions?, (vi) The algebraic semantics of closures developed by McKinsey and Tarski Jónsson to interpret the modal system S4 enables correctly to interpret the deontic propositions?, (vii) Observing the necessity of to understand the obligation operator according to the idea of degrees of truth, it would be more correct interpret this deontic operator with semantic structures of the fuzzy logic? We intend throughout this thesis to present answers to each of these questions. As initial strategy, we show that the notion of obligatory can be better understood in terms of the idea of gradation. We investigate this in the context of morality, politics, legality and logic (Chapter 01 and Chapter 02). The fuzzy logic is able to formalize vague expressions such as “more or less true”. This kind of logic admits to the truth different degrees. Based on this, we propose a fuzzy semantic able to interpret more adequately the obligation deontic operator, which binds of form “more or less strong” an agent to perform the obligatory legal norm (Chapter 03). This approach proves itslef to be quite significant once it allows to (i) validate of axioms of the deontic formal system OS5, (ii) invalidate the formulas not intuitive, and (iii) eliminate the following deontic paradoxes: “Paradox of Derived Obligation”, “Paradox of Compromise” (Prior’s Paradox), “Paradox of the Minor Murderer” and “The Must versus Ought Dilemma” (Chapter 4). |
id |
UFPB_c11c7534cce8031e38e7e315f4c5cbf3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufpb.br:123456789/11555 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPB |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicasNorma JurídicaObrigaçãoLógica DeônticaParadoxos DeônticosLógica FuzzyLegal NormObligationDeontic LogicDeontic ParadoxesFuzzy LogicCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAThe contemporary deontic logic uses besides of the deontic operators obligatory, permitted e forbidden also modern symbolic and mathematical techniques in the analysis of normative discourses. In that sense, given the complexity of this type of discourse, even today, a series of s questions are raised, as follows here: (i) What is the meaning of the expression “to be obligatory”? (ii) What is obligatory is the case?, (iii) What is the case, is permitted?, (iv) Can we consider deontic logic as a mere extension of modal logic, i.e. is it possible to convert all modal axioms into deontic axioms (equally valid)?, (v) The “possible worlds semantics” proposed by Kripke allows us to interpret adequately, or even intuitively, deontic propositions?, (vi) The algebraic semantics of closures developed by McKinsey and Tarski Jónsson to interpret the modal system S4 enables correctly to interpret the deontic propositions?, (vii) Observing the necessity of to understand the obligation operator according to the idea of degrees of truth, it would be more correct interpret this deontic operator with semantic structures of the fuzzy logic? We intend throughout this thesis to present answers to each of these questions. As initial strategy, we show that the notion of obligatory can be better understood in terms of the idea of gradation. We investigate this in the context of morality, politics, legality and logic (Chapter 01 and Chapter 02). The fuzzy logic is able to formalize vague expressions such as “more or less true”. This kind of logic admits to the truth different degrees. Based on this, we propose a fuzzy semantic able to interpret more adequately the obligation deontic operator, which binds of form “more or less strong” an agent to perform the obligatory legal norm (Chapter 03). This approach proves itslef to be quite significant once it allows to (i) validate of axioms of the deontic formal system OS5, (ii) invalidate the formulas not intuitive, and (iii) eliminate the following deontic paradoxes: “Paradox of Derived Obligation”, “Paradox of Compromise” (Prior’s Paradox), “Paradox of the Minor Murderer” and “The Must versus Ought Dilemma” (Chapter 4).NenhumaA lógica deôntica contemporânea emprega além de operadores deônticos de obrigação, permissão e proibição também técnicas simbólicas e matemáticas modernas na análise de discursos normativos. Subjaz a abordagem lógica deste tipo de discurso, ainda hoje, as seguintes questões, a saber: (i) Qual é o significado da expressão “estar obrigado a”?; (ii) O que é obrigatório, é o caso?; (iii) O que é o caso, é permitido?; (iv) Podemos considerar a lógica deôntica tão somente como uma reformulação da lógica modal, ou seja, é possível converter todos os axiomas modais em axiomas deônticos correspondentes (igualmente válidos)?; (v) A “semântica de mundos possíveis” proposta por Kripke nos permite interpretar de modo adequado as proposições deônticas?; (vi) A semântica algébrica de fechos desenvolvida por McKinsey, McKinsey e Tarski e, ainda, Jónsson e Tarski nos permite interpretar corretamenteasproposiçõesdeônticas?; (vii)Observadaanecessidadedeseentenderooperadordeobrigaçãoemfunçãodaideiadegrausdeverdade,nãoseriamais acertado interpretarmos este operador deôntico com estruturas semânticas da lógicafuzzy(oulógicadifusa)? Pretendemosaolongodestateseapresentarrespostas paracadaumadestasquestões. Comoestratégiainicial,mostramosqueanoçãode obrigação pode ser melhor compreendida em função da ideia de gradação. Investigamosistonoscontextosdamoral, dapolítica, dalegalidadeedalógica(Capítulo 01 e Capítulo 02). A lógica fuzzy é capaz de formalizar expressões vagas. Este tipo de lógica admite vários graus de valor-de-verdade. Com base nisto, em seguida, propomosumasemânticafuzzycapazdeinterpretardemodomaisadequadoooperador deôntico de obrigação, que vincula de modo “mais ou menos forte” um agente à norma jurídica obrigatória (Capítulo 03). Esta interpretação revela-se profícua na medida em que permite (i) validar os esquemas de axiomas do sistema deôntico OS5, (ii) invalidar fórmulas não intuitivas e (iii) eliminar os seguintes paradoxos deônticos: “Paradoxo da obrigação Derivada”, “Paradoxo do Compromisso” (Paradoxo de Prior), “Paradoxo do Dever versus Dever-ser” e “Paradoxo do Homicida Menor de Idade” (Capítulo 04).Universidade Federal da ParaíbaBrasilFilosofiaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFPBQueiroz, Giovanni da Silva dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5394233116315220Ferreira, Rodrigo Costa2018-08-28T20:32:16Z2018-08-282018-08-28T20:32:16Z2014-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesishttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/11555porinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPBinstname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)instacron:UFPB2018-09-06T02:51:29Zoai:repositorio.ufpb.br:123456789/11555Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/PUBhttp://tede.biblioteca.ufpb.br:8080/oai/requestdiretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.bropendoar:2018-09-06T02:51:29Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicas |
title |
Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicas |
spellingShingle |
Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicas Ferreira, Rodrigo Costa Norma Jurídica Obrigação Lógica Deôntica Paradoxos Deônticos Lógica Fuzzy Legal Norm Obligation Deontic Logic Deontic Paradoxes Fuzzy Logic CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicas |
title_full |
Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicas |
title_fullStr |
Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicas |
title_sort |
Interpretação deôntica e difusa das normas jurídicas |
author |
Ferreira, Rodrigo Costa |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Rodrigo Costa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Queiroz, Giovanni da Silva de http://lattes.cnpq.br/5394233116315220 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Rodrigo Costa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Norma Jurídica Obrigação Lógica Deôntica Paradoxos Deônticos Lógica Fuzzy Legal Norm Obligation Deontic Logic Deontic Paradoxes Fuzzy Logic CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
topic |
Norma Jurídica Obrigação Lógica Deôntica Paradoxos Deônticos Lógica Fuzzy Legal Norm Obligation Deontic Logic Deontic Paradoxes Fuzzy Logic CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The contemporary deontic logic uses besides of the deontic operators obligatory, permitted e forbidden also modern symbolic and mathematical techniques in the analysis of normative discourses. In that sense, given the complexity of this type of discourse, even today, a series of s questions are raised, as follows here: (i) What is the meaning of the expression “to be obligatory”? (ii) What is obligatory is the case?, (iii) What is the case, is permitted?, (iv) Can we consider deontic logic as a mere extension of modal logic, i.e. is it possible to convert all modal axioms into deontic axioms (equally valid)?, (v) The “possible worlds semantics” proposed by Kripke allows us to interpret adequately, or even intuitively, deontic propositions?, (vi) The algebraic semantics of closures developed by McKinsey and Tarski Jónsson to interpret the modal system S4 enables correctly to interpret the deontic propositions?, (vii) Observing the necessity of to understand the obligation operator according to the idea of degrees of truth, it would be more correct interpret this deontic operator with semantic structures of the fuzzy logic? We intend throughout this thesis to present answers to each of these questions. As initial strategy, we show that the notion of obligatory can be better understood in terms of the idea of gradation. We investigate this in the context of morality, politics, legality and logic (Chapter 01 and Chapter 02). The fuzzy logic is able to formalize vague expressions such as “more or less true”. This kind of logic admits to the truth different degrees. Based on this, we propose a fuzzy semantic able to interpret more adequately the obligation deontic operator, which binds of form “more or less strong” an agent to perform the obligatory legal norm (Chapter 03). This approach proves itslef to be quite significant once it allows to (i) validate of axioms of the deontic formal system OS5, (ii) invalidate the formulas not intuitive, and (iii) eliminate the following deontic paradoxes: “Paradox of Derived Obligation”, “Paradox of Compromise” (Prior’s Paradox), “Paradox of the Minor Murderer” and “The Must versus Ought Dilemma” (Chapter 4). |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-09-01 2018-08-28T20:32:16Z 2018-08-28 2018-08-28T20:32:16Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/11555 |
url |
https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/11555 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brasil Filosofia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia UFPB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brasil Filosofia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia UFPB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB instname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) instacron:UFPB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) |
instacron_str |
UFPB |
institution |
UFPB |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
diretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.br |
_version_ |
1801842931699548160 |