A dialética entre educação jurídica e educação do campo: a experiência da turma Evandro Lins e Silva da UFG derrubando as cercas do saber jurídico

• Autor(a) principal: Morais, Hugo Belarmino de
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/tede/4371
• topic: Educação Jurídica; Educação do Campo; Direitos Humanos; PRONERA; Teorias críticas do Direito; Law Education; Rural Education; Human Rights; PRONERA; Critical theories of Law; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

What happens when an experience that enables the understanding and operationalization of Law by rural populations, historically detached to work with and reflect on the legal phenomenon, is created within a hegemonic conservative course and impervious to the popular classes and groups? The objective of this study is to analyze and systematize a unique initiative: a Special Class of Law Studies to beneficiaries of Land Reform and Family Farming at the Federal University of Goiás (UFG- BRAZIL), founded in 2007 and currently under development at campus of Goiás city. This is the first initiative of Law Education at the shape of the National Education Program in Agrarian Reform (PRONERA) and was named by the students "Class Evandro Lins e Silva", an eminent Brazilian jurist. Through field research and critical-dialectical approach, we examined the reasons why a single Class, 60 students, sparked so many conflicts, understood as dialectically articulated themes that allow us to reflect on the bigger context that conditions and influences it. At first, we set out some details about the reality of the campus of Goias and the idealization of the proposal, following the administrative procedures until its approval and pointing out several conflicts that arose during this process. Soon after, we analyzed the so-called central pattern of Law Education established in Brazil, in order to characterize, from a little historical background, its basic points: dogmatism, decontextualization and unidisciplinarity. In the fourth chapter, we reflected on two conceptions of human rights - one traditional and other critical and dialectic - applying this discussion to the socio-historical context of the Brazilian Countryside, noting the statement of legal and constitutional rights to Territory and to Education as an insight into the so-called "Paradigm of Rural Education" as a Human Right. Finally, we returned to the experience with other informations from field research, by reviewing the arguments contained in court cases involving the class, systematized by the researcher. The opinions of the Class students were exposed, pointing difficulties for achievement of the proposal. On concluded that the Class "Evandro Lins e Silva" beyond legally appropriate represents a symbolic and material alternative landmark to the central model of Law Education, allowing a "pedagogical conflict" between these two models of "Education" Law Education and Rural Education. These results keep a great potential to reflect upon a redirectionment of Law Education in a more critical and emancipator way, given by the fact the discussions about the affirmative actions politics for the rural population in Law Education are recent in academic circles, at least in Brazil. The specificity of the Class indicates a possibility of expanding the debate beyond the traditional curricular 'solutions', enabling us to formulate hypotheses and questions only existent in practice of this initiative, which alone would justify its existence, with social and academic consequences of great importance.