As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava Jato
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23128 |
Resumo: | The present study, based on the Theory of Argumentation in Language (TAL), as well as on Modalization Studies, is affiliated to the perspective that not only language is argumentative, but also its use, since we understand that the user of language, by selecting certain linguistic elements in detriment of others, imprints its subjectivity in the enunciation. Thus, the general objective of this research is to analyze the semantic-argumentative functioning of speaker polyphony, in direct and indirect style, of the SE-locutor, and of the modalizers in the judicial deposition genre, the corpus of this study. To this end, the thesis that guides this study is that the main phenomena of argumentative orientation used by these speakers during the judicial deposition are the speaker polyphony and the SE-locutor, together with discourse modalization, considering that the use of these resources constitutes a significant strategy of defense and/or accusation, depending on the speaker that uses these resources. Therefore, depending on the speaker that evokes these phenomena, the alien discourses introduced in the testimony are used to allow the commitment of the defendant (by the judge and the prosecutor) or his defense (by the defendant or the defense). The present research is justified by the unprecedented treatment given to the judicial testimony genre, given that among the existing studies on this genre, none of them focuses on the argumentative phenomena analyzed in this investigation, nor do they specifically turn to this testimony, from its characterization as a genre of discourse and the argumentative strategies that constitute it.As methodology, we adopted a descriptive and qualitative approach, since we described the phenomena identified in the research corpus in order to sustain the analyses developed. It should be noted, therefore, that the corpus for descriptive-interpretative analysis of this research is composed of eighteen (18) excerpts extracted from the first deposition of Former President Luís Inácio Lula da Silva granted to Judge Sérgio Fernando Moro, in Operation Lava Jato, in May 2017. The analyses undertaken confirm the thesis that the main phenomena of argumentative orientation used by the speakers, in this deposition, are speaker polyphony and SE-locutor, sometimes in conjunction with discourse modalization. Moreover, they reveal that depending on the speaker evoking such phenomena, the alien discourses introduced in the deposition are used to enable the defendant's commitment (by the judge and the prosecution) or his defense (by the defendant or the defense). In this sense, the results reveal that the polyphony of speakers, the SE-locutor and the modalizers used by the speaker, responsible for the whole enunciation, serve not only to introduce the voice of another in the discourse, but also to express his positioning in relation to the enunciated content and the voice of the other. Thus, the speaker marks in his discourse, through certain linguistic strategies, how the interlocutor should read or (re)act before what is said. |
id |
UFPB_f7e803e877cf03529955ece873d1bf1f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufpb.br:123456789/23128 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPB |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava JatoArgumentaçãoPolifonia de locutoresModalizaçãoDepoimento judicialArgumentationPolyphony of speakersModalizationJudicial testimonyCNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICAThe present study, based on the Theory of Argumentation in Language (TAL), as well as on Modalization Studies, is affiliated to the perspective that not only language is argumentative, but also its use, since we understand that the user of language, by selecting certain linguistic elements in detriment of others, imprints its subjectivity in the enunciation. Thus, the general objective of this research is to analyze the semantic-argumentative functioning of speaker polyphony, in direct and indirect style, of the SE-locutor, and of the modalizers in the judicial deposition genre, the corpus of this study. To this end, the thesis that guides this study is that the main phenomena of argumentative orientation used by these speakers during the judicial deposition are the speaker polyphony and the SE-locutor, together with discourse modalization, considering that the use of these resources constitutes a significant strategy of defense and/or accusation, depending on the speaker that uses these resources. Therefore, depending on the speaker that evokes these phenomena, the alien discourses introduced in the testimony are used to allow the commitment of the defendant (by the judge and the prosecutor) or his defense (by the defendant or the defense). The present research is justified by the unprecedented treatment given to the judicial testimony genre, given that among the existing studies on this genre, none of them focuses on the argumentative phenomena analyzed in this investigation, nor do they specifically turn to this testimony, from its characterization as a genre of discourse and the argumentative strategies that constitute it.As methodology, we adopted a descriptive and qualitative approach, since we described the phenomena identified in the research corpus in order to sustain the analyses developed. It should be noted, therefore, that the corpus for descriptive-interpretative analysis of this research is composed of eighteen (18) excerpts extracted from the first deposition of Former President Luís Inácio Lula da Silva granted to Judge Sérgio Fernando Moro, in Operation Lava Jato, in May 2017. The analyses undertaken confirm the thesis that the main phenomena of argumentative orientation used by the speakers, in this deposition, are speaker polyphony and SE-locutor, sometimes in conjunction with discourse modalization. Moreover, they reveal that depending on the speaker evoking such phenomena, the alien discourses introduced in the deposition are used to enable the defendant's commitment (by the judge and the prosecution) or his defense (by the defendant or the defense). In this sense, the results reveal that the polyphony of speakers, the SE-locutor and the modalizers used by the speaker, responsible for the whole enunciation, serve not only to introduce the voice of another in the discourse, but also to express his positioning in relation to the enunciated content and the voice of the other. Thus, the speaker marks in his discourse, through certain linguistic strategies, how the interlocutor should read or (re)act before what is said.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESO presente estudo, pautado na Teoria da Argumentação na Língua (TAL), bem como nos Estudos sobre a Modalização, filia-se à perspectiva de que não só a língua é argumentativa, mas também seu uso, uma vez que compreendemos que o usuário da língua ao selecionar determinados elementos linguísticos, em detrimento de outros, imprime no enunciado sua subjetividade. Desse modo, o objetivo geral desta pesquisa é analisar o funcionamento semântico-argumentativo da polifonia de locutores, em estilo direto e indireto, do SE-locutor, e dos modalizadores no gênero depoimento judicial, corpus do referido estudo. Para tanto, a tese que norteia o estudo em questão é a de que os principais fenômenos de orientação argumentativa utilizados por esses locutores, durante o depoimento judicial, são a polifonia de locutores e o SE-locutor, em conjunto com a modalização discursiva, tendo em vista que o uso desses recursos se constitui como significativa estratégia de defesa e/ou acusação a depender do locutor que utiliza esses recursos. Sendo assim, a depender do locutor que evoque tais fenômenos, os discursos alheios introduzidos no depoimento são utilizados para permitir o comprometimento do réu (por parte do juiz e do ministério público) ou a sua defesa (por parte do réu ou da defesa). A presente pesquisa se justifica pelo tratamento inédito dado ao gênero depoimento judicial, haja vista que entre os estudos já existentes sobre esse gênero nenhum se debruça sobre os fenômenos argumentativos analisados nesta investigação, tampouco se voltam, especificamente, para esse depoimento, a partir de sua caracterização enquanto gênero do discurso e das estratégias argumentativas que o constitui. Como metodologia, adotamos a abordagem de natureza descritiva e qualitativa, haja vista que descrevemos os fenômenos identificados no corpus da pesquisa, a fim de sustentar as análises desenvolvidas. Importa ressaltar, portanto, que o corpus para análise descritivo-interpretativista desta investigação é composto por 18 (dezoito) trechos extraídos do primeiro depoimento do Ex-presidente Luís Inácio Lula da Silva concedido ao juiz Sérgio Fernando Moro, na Operação Lava Jato, no mês de maio de 2017. As análises empreendidas confirmam a tese de que os principais fenômenos de orientação argumentativa utilizados pelos locutores, nesse depoimento, são a polifonia de locutores e o SE-locutor, algumas vezes em conjunto com a modalização discursiva. Além disso, revelam que a depender do locutor que evoque tais fenômenos, os discursos alheios introduzidos no depoimento são utilizados para permitir o comprometimento do réu (por parte do juiz e do ministério público) ou a sua defesa (por parte do réu ou da defesa). Nesse sentido, os resultados revelam que a polifonia de locutores, o SE-locutor e os modalizadores utilizados pelo locutor, responsável por todo enunciado, servem não só para introduzir a voz alheia no discurso, mas também para expressar seu posicionamento em relação ao conteúdo enunciado e à voz do outro. Com isso, o locutor marca em seu discurso, por meio de determinadas estratégias linguísticas, como o interlocutor deve ler ou (re)agir diante do dito.Universidade Federal da ParaíbaBrasilLinguísticaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em LinguísticaUFPBNascimento, Erivaldo Pereira dohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1387440188491826Morais, Maria Eliane Gomes2022-06-14T18:38:46Z2022-04-052022-06-14T18:38:46Z2022-02-23info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesishttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23128porAttribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPBinstname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)instacron:UFPB2022-06-15T16:30:25Zoai:repositorio.ufpb.br:123456789/23128Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufpb.br/PUBhttp://tede.biblioteca.ufpb.br:8080/oai/requestdiretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.bropendoar:2022-06-15T16:30:25Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava Jato |
title |
As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava Jato |
spellingShingle |
As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava Jato Morais, Maria Eliane Gomes Argumentação Polifonia de locutores Modalização Depoimento judicial Argumentation Polyphony of speakers Modalization Judicial testimony CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA |
title_short |
As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava Jato |
title_full |
As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava Jato |
title_fullStr |
As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava Jato |
title_full_unstemmed |
As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava Jato |
title_sort |
As vozes que fundamentam o dizer: análise da polifonia e da modalização no primeiro depoimento de Lula a Sérgio Moro no âmbito da Lava Jato |
author |
Morais, Maria Eliane Gomes |
author_facet |
Morais, Maria Eliane Gomes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Nascimento, Erivaldo Pereira do http://lattes.cnpq.br/1387440188491826 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Morais, Maria Eliane Gomes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Argumentação Polifonia de locutores Modalização Depoimento judicial Argumentation Polyphony of speakers Modalization Judicial testimony CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA |
topic |
Argumentação Polifonia de locutores Modalização Depoimento judicial Argumentation Polyphony of speakers Modalization Judicial testimony CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA |
description |
The present study, based on the Theory of Argumentation in Language (TAL), as well as on Modalization Studies, is affiliated to the perspective that not only language is argumentative, but also its use, since we understand that the user of language, by selecting certain linguistic elements in detriment of others, imprints its subjectivity in the enunciation. Thus, the general objective of this research is to analyze the semantic-argumentative functioning of speaker polyphony, in direct and indirect style, of the SE-locutor, and of the modalizers in the judicial deposition genre, the corpus of this study. To this end, the thesis that guides this study is that the main phenomena of argumentative orientation used by these speakers during the judicial deposition are the speaker polyphony and the SE-locutor, together with discourse modalization, considering that the use of these resources constitutes a significant strategy of defense and/or accusation, depending on the speaker that uses these resources. Therefore, depending on the speaker that evokes these phenomena, the alien discourses introduced in the testimony are used to allow the commitment of the defendant (by the judge and the prosecutor) or his defense (by the defendant or the defense). The present research is justified by the unprecedented treatment given to the judicial testimony genre, given that among the existing studies on this genre, none of them focuses on the argumentative phenomena analyzed in this investigation, nor do they specifically turn to this testimony, from its characterization as a genre of discourse and the argumentative strategies that constitute it.As methodology, we adopted a descriptive and qualitative approach, since we described the phenomena identified in the research corpus in order to sustain the analyses developed. It should be noted, therefore, that the corpus for descriptive-interpretative analysis of this research is composed of eighteen (18) excerpts extracted from the first deposition of Former President Luís Inácio Lula da Silva granted to Judge Sérgio Fernando Moro, in Operation Lava Jato, in May 2017. The analyses undertaken confirm the thesis that the main phenomena of argumentative orientation used by the speakers, in this deposition, are speaker polyphony and SE-locutor, sometimes in conjunction with discourse modalization. Moreover, they reveal that depending on the speaker evoking such phenomena, the alien discourses introduced in the deposition are used to enable the defendant's commitment (by the judge and the prosecution) or his defense (by the defendant or the defense). In this sense, the results reveal that the polyphony of speakers, the SE-locutor and the modalizers used by the speaker, responsible for the whole enunciation, serve not only to introduce the voice of another in the discourse, but also to express his positioning in relation to the enunciated content and the voice of the other. Thus, the speaker marks in his discourse, through certain linguistic strategies, how the interlocutor should read or (re)act before what is said. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-14T18:38:46Z 2022-04-05 2022-06-14T18:38:46Z 2022-02-23 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23128 |
url |
https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23128 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brasil Linguística Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística UFPB |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba Brasil Linguística Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística UFPB |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB instname:Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) instacron:UFPB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) |
instacron_str |
UFPB |
institution |
UFPB |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFPB - Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
diretoria@ufpb.br|| diretoria@ufpb.br |
_version_ |
1801842994738888704 |