FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKET
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada |
Texto Completo: | http://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repa/article/view/1223 |
Resumo: | The feasibility study allows the consumer of electricity to obtain an analysis of the possibility of obtaining savings, so that he can choose whether to remain in the Captive Market or opt for the Free Market migration. For this purpose, a study was elaborated based on the amounts charged in each marketing environment, analyzing each tariff individually. Based on this, it could be observed that in the case in question the Free Energy Market is a good alternative when compared to the Captive Market, since the latter is more financially costly when compared to former. In addition to highlighting the more economical contracting mode, the study provided a better understanding of the tradable markets in the energy field, so that the user does not have to be always bound to the prices and conditions of the concessionaires. |
id |
UFPE-2_b2fe19fdaf26a8ed3b5bc748305797d5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.poli.br:article/1223 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPE-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKETEstudo de Viabilidade: Mercado Livre vs Mercado CativoThe feasibility study allows the consumer of electricity to obtain an analysis of the possibility of obtaining savings, so that he can choose whether to remain in the Captive Market or opt for the Free Market migration. For this purpose, a study was elaborated based on the amounts charged in each marketing environment, analyzing each tariff individually. Based on this, it could be observed that in the case in question the Free Energy Market is a good alternative when compared to the Captive Market, since the latter is more financially costly when compared to former. In addition to highlighting the more economical contracting mode, the study provided a better understanding of the tradable markets in the energy field, so that the user does not have to be always bound to the prices and conditions of the concessionaires.O estudo de viabilidade permite que o consumidor de energia elétrica obtenha uma análise acerca da possibilidade de obter economia, de maneira que ele pode escolher se permanece no Mercado Regulado ou opta pela migração para o Mercado Livre. Para tanto, foi elaborado um estudo com base nos valores cobrados em cada ambiente de comercialização, analisando cada tarifa individualmente. Com base nisso, pôde-se observar que,no caso em questão,o Mercado Livre de Energia é uma boa alternativa quando comparado ao Mercado Cativo, uma vez que este é mais oneroso financeiramente quando comparado àquele. Além de evidenciar o modo de contratação mais econômico, o estudoproporcionou uma melhor compreensão sobre os mercados passíveis de negociação no âmbito energético, de forma que o usuário não precise ficar sempre vinculado aos preços e condições das concessionárias.Escola Politécnica de Pernambuco2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repa/article/view/122310.25286/repa.v4i2.1223Journal of Engineering and Applied Research; Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Renewable Energy Issue; 81-89Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada; v. 4 n. 2 (2019): Edição Especial em Energias Renováveis; 81-892525-425110.25286/repa.v4i2reponame:Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicadainstname:Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)instacron:UFPEporhttp://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repa/article/view/1223/498http://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repa/article/view/1223/599-Copyright (c) 2019 Caio Rocha Teberge, Eduardo Sodréhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeberge, Caio RochaSodré, Eduardo2021-07-13T08:41:27Zoai:ojs.poli.br:article/1223Revistahttp://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repaONGhttp://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repa/oai||repa@poli.br2525-42512525-4251opendoar:2021-07-13T08:41:27Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKET Estudo de Viabilidade: Mercado Livre vs Mercado Cativo |
title |
FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKET |
spellingShingle |
FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKET Teberge, Caio Rocha |
title_short |
FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKET |
title_full |
FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKET |
title_fullStr |
FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKET |
title_full_unstemmed |
FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKET |
title_sort |
FEASIBILITY STUDY: FREE MARKET VS CAPTIVE MARKET |
author |
Teberge, Caio Rocha |
author_facet |
Teberge, Caio Rocha Sodré, Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sodré, Eduardo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teberge, Caio Rocha Sodré, Eduardo |
description |
The feasibility study allows the consumer of electricity to obtain an analysis of the possibility of obtaining savings, so that he can choose whether to remain in the Captive Market or opt for the Free Market migration. For this purpose, a study was elaborated based on the amounts charged in each marketing environment, analyzing each tariff individually. Based on this, it could be observed that in the case in question the Free Energy Market is a good alternative when compared to the Captive Market, since the latter is more financially costly when compared to former. In addition to highlighting the more economical contracting mode, the study provided a better understanding of the tradable markets in the energy field, so that the user does not have to be always bound to the prices and conditions of the concessionaires. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repa/article/view/1223 10.25286/repa.v4i2.1223 |
url |
http://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repa/article/view/1223 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25286/repa.v4i2.1223 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repa/article/view/1223/498 http://revistas.poli.br/index.php/repa/article/view/1223/599 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Caio Rocha Teberge, Eduardo Sodré http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Caio Rocha Teberge, Eduardo Sodré http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
- |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Politécnica de Pernambuco |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Politécnica de Pernambuco |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Engineering and Applied Research; Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Renewable Energy Issue; 81-89 Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada; v. 4 n. 2 (2019): Edição Especial em Energias Renováveis; 81-89 2525-4251 10.25286/repa.v4i2 reponame:Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada instname:Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) instacron:UFPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
instacron_str |
UFPE |
institution |
UFPE |
reponame_str |
Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada |
collection |
Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Engenharia e Pesquisa Aplicada - Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||repa@poli.br |
_version_ |
1798035999794659328 |