LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃO

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Aires de Carvalho, Helder Buenos
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pensando
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/3288
Resumo: NICHOLAS, Jeffery L. Reason, Tradition, and the Good: MacIntyre's Tradition-Constituted Reason and Frankfurt School Critical Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012. In Reason, Tradition, and the Good, Jeffery L. Nicholas addresses the failure of reason in modernity to bring about a just society, a society in which people can attain fulfillment. Developing the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, Nicholas argues that we rely too heavily on a conception of rationality that is divorced from tradition and, therefore, incapable of judging ends. Without the ability to judge ends, we cannot engage in debate about the good life or the proper goods that we as individuals and as a society should pursue.Nicholas claims that the project of enlightenment—defined as the promotion of autonomous reason—failed because it was based on a deformed notion of reason as mere rationality, and that a critical theory of society aimed at human emancipation must turn to substantive reason, a reason constituted by and constitutive of tradition. To find a reason capable of judging ends, Nicholas suggests, we must turn to Alasdair MacIntyre’s Thomistic-Aristotelianism. Substantive reason comprises thinking and acting on the set of standards and beliefs within a particular tradition. It is the impossibility of enlightenment rationality to evaluate ends and the possibility of substantive reason to evaluate ends that makes the one unsuitable and the other suitable for a critical theory of society. Nicholas’s compelling argument, written in accessible language, remains committed to the promise of reason to help individuals achieve a good and just society and a good life. This requires, however, a complete revolution in the way we approach social life. Jeffery L. Nicholas é assistant professor of philosophy no Providence College.
id UFPI-1_5fbc7d27a7c0d042749ff3416838d079
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufpi.br:article/3288
network_acronym_str UFPI-1
network_name_str Pensando
repository_id_str
spelling LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃONICHOLAS, Jeffery L. Reason, Tradition, and the Good: MacIntyre's Tradition-Constituted Reason and Frankfurt School Critical Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012. In Reason, Tradition, and the Good, Jeffery L. Nicholas addresses the failure of reason in modernity to bring about a just society, a society in which people can attain fulfillment. Developing the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, Nicholas argues that we rely too heavily on a conception of rationality that is divorced from tradition and, therefore, incapable of judging ends. Without the ability to judge ends, we cannot engage in debate about the good life or the proper goods that we as individuals and as a society should pursue.Nicholas claims that the project of enlightenment—defined as the promotion of autonomous reason—failed because it was based on a deformed notion of reason as mere rationality, and that a critical theory of society aimed at human emancipation must turn to substantive reason, a reason constituted by and constitutive of tradition. To find a reason capable of judging ends, Nicholas suggests, we must turn to Alasdair MacIntyre’s Thomistic-Aristotelianism. Substantive reason comprises thinking and acting on the set of standards and beliefs within a particular tradition. It is the impossibility of enlightenment rationality to evaluate ends and the possibility of substantive reason to evaluate ends that makes the one unsuitable and the other suitable for a critical theory of society. Nicholas’s compelling argument, written in accessible language, remains committed to the promise of reason to help individuals achieve a good and just society and a good life. This requires, however, a complete revolution in the way we approach social life. Jeffery L. Nicholas é assistant professor of philosophy no Providence College.EDUFPI2015-09-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionimage/jpeghttps://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/328810.26694/pensando.v6i11.3616.g2080PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA; Vol. 6 No. 11 (2015): DOSSIÊ ALASDAIR MACINTYRE/VARIA; 448PENSANDO - REVUE DE PHILOSOPHIE; Vol. 6 No 11 (2015): DOSSIÊ ALASDAIR MACINTYRE/VARIA; 448PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA; v. 6 n. 11 (2015): DOSSIÊ ALASDAIR MACINTYRE/VARIA; 4482178-843Xreponame:Pensandoinstname:Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)instacron:UFPIporhttps://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/3288/2872Copyright (c) 2022 PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIAinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAires de Carvalho, Helder Buenos 2022-10-27T01:52:27Zoai:periodicos.ufpi.br:article/3288Revistahttp://www.ojs.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/oai||revista.pensando@gmail.com2178-843X2178-843Xopendoar:2022-10-27T01:52:27Pensando - Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃO
title LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃO
spellingShingle LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃO
Aires de Carvalho, Helder Buenos
title_short LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃO
title_full LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃO
title_fullStr LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃO
title_full_unstemmed LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃO
title_sort LIVRO DISCUTE MACINTYRE E A ESCOLA DE FRANKFURT EM TORNO DE UM CONCEITO DE RAZÃO
author Aires de Carvalho, Helder Buenos
author_facet Aires de Carvalho, Helder Buenos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Aires de Carvalho, Helder Buenos
description NICHOLAS, Jeffery L. Reason, Tradition, and the Good: MacIntyre's Tradition-Constituted Reason and Frankfurt School Critical Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012. In Reason, Tradition, and the Good, Jeffery L. Nicholas addresses the failure of reason in modernity to bring about a just society, a society in which people can attain fulfillment. Developing the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, Nicholas argues that we rely too heavily on a conception of rationality that is divorced from tradition and, therefore, incapable of judging ends. Without the ability to judge ends, we cannot engage in debate about the good life or the proper goods that we as individuals and as a society should pursue.Nicholas claims that the project of enlightenment—defined as the promotion of autonomous reason—failed because it was based on a deformed notion of reason as mere rationality, and that a critical theory of society aimed at human emancipation must turn to substantive reason, a reason constituted by and constitutive of tradition. To find a reason capable of judging ends, Nicholas suggests, we must turn to Alasdair MacIntyre’s Thomistic-Aristotelianism. Substantive reason comprises thinking and acting on the set of standards and beliefs within a particular tradition. It is the impossibility of enlightenment rationality to evaluate ends and the possibility of substantive reason to evaluate ends that makes the one unsuitable and the other suitable for a critical theory of society. Nicholas’s compelling argument, written in accessible language, remains committed to the promise of reason to help individuals achieve a good and just society and a good life. This requires, however, a complete revolution in the way we approach social life. Jeffery L. Nicholas é assistant professor of philosophy no Providence College.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-09-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/3288
10.26694/pensando.v6i11.3616.g2080
url https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/3288
identifier_str_mv 10.26694/pensando.v6i11.3616.g2080
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/3288/2872
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv image/jpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA; Vol. 6 No. 11 (2015): DOSSIÊ ALASDAIR MACINTYRE/VARIA; 448
PENSANDO - REVUE DE PHILOSOPHIE; Vol. 6 No 11 (2015): DOSSIÊ ALASDAIR MACINTYRE/VARIA; 448
PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA; v. 6 n. 11 (2015): DOSSIÊ ALASDAIR MACINTYRE/VARIA; 448
2178-843X
reponame:Pensando
instname:Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)
instacron:UFPI
instname_str Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)
instacron_str UFPI
institution UFPI
reponame_str Pensando
collection Pensando
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pensando - Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.pensando@gmail.com
_version_ 1799755925281570816