Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonarist

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sousa Assai, José Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pensando
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/4064
Resumo: The basic scope of a Critical Theory is based on emancipation, which results from analysis, diagnosis, and a corrective attitude toward a social pathology. Taking this assumption into account, the current scenario of political Brazilian is rooted in populism which obliterates the constitutive elements of the “Social” understood as institutions, practices, and social relations. Under the mainstay of an “Aufklärung” of a critical theory of politics and based on the current Brazilian social and political context, I aim to explicit, in this research, the demand for an ethical and solidary conception as an answer to the social and political problems of “Bolsonarist” populism that undermines the “Social” sphere in Brazil. In this regard, I start from the basic idea that a critical theory should take on a decolonial thought as an assumption of its social and normative understanding (1). Considering (1), an immanent criticism of the current populism moves towards an ethical-solidary action as an attempt to correct this political “dasein” (2).
id UFPI-1_9e7b8f8826ff9616f289dc32ab0f56f8
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufpi.br:article/4064
network_acronym_str UFPI-1
network_name_str Pensando
repository_id_str
spelling Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonaristÉtica solidária, para quê? Entre a Crítica e o “Social” como apontamentos ao populismo bolsonarista Teoria CríticaPopulismosolidariedadeFilosofia SocialFilosofia políticacritical theorypopulismsolidarityPolitical philosophySocial philosophyThe basic scope of a Critical Theory is based on emancipation, which results from analysis, diagnosis, and a corrective attitude toward a social pathology. Taking this assumption into account, the current scenario of political Brazilian is rooted in populism which obliterates the constitutive elements of the “Social” understood as institutions, practices, and social relations. Under the mainstay of an “Aufklärung” of a critical theory of politics and based on the current Brazilian social and political context, I aim to explicit, in this research, the demand for an ethical and solidary conception as an answer to the social and political problems of “Bolsonarist” populism that undermines the “Social” sphere in Brazil. In this regard, I start from the basic idea that a critical theory should take on a decolonial thought as an assumption of its social and normative understanding (1). Considering (1), an immanent criticism of the current populism moves towards an ethical-solidary action as an attempt to correct this political “dasein” (2).O escopo basilar de uma Teoria Crítica tem como fundamento a emancipação na qual decorre da análise, do diagnóstico e de uma atitude corretiva perante uma determinada patologia social. Levando-se em consideração esses pressupostos, o atual cenário político brasileiro centrado sob uma forma populista tende a obliterar os elementos constitutivos do “Social” entendido preliminarmente enquanto instituições, práticas e relações sociais.  Sob o esteio de uma Aufklärung de uma teoria crítica da política, e tendo como base empírica o atual contexto social e político brasileiro, pretendo explicitar, nesta pesquisa, a exigência de uma ética-solidária como forma de responder aos problemas de ordem social e político nos quais se emolduram sob o modo de um populismo “bolsonarista” no qual solapa a esfera “Social” no Brasil. Para tal tratativa, parto da ideia básica de que uma teoria crítica deva assumir um pensamento decolonial como plataforma de sua compreensiva socionormatividade (1). Ao assumir (1), uma crítica imanente ao vigente populismo se move para uma ação ético-solidária como tentativa de correção desse “dasein” político (2).EDUFPI2023-05-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/406410.26694/pensando.vol14i31.4064PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA; Vol. 14 No. 31 (2023): VARIA; 18-32PENSANDO - REVUE DE PHILOSOPHIE; Vol. 14 No 31 (2023): VARIA; 18-32PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA; v. 14 n. 31 (2023): VARIA; 18-322178-843X10.26694/pensando.vol14i31reponame:Pensandoinstname:Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)instacron:UFPIporhttps://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/4064/3635https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/4064/3646Copyright (c) 2023 PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIAhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSousa Assai, José Henrique2023-05-06T21:51:03Zoai:periodicos.ufpi.br:article/4064Revistahttp://www.ojs.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/oai||revista.pensando@gmail.com2178-843X2178-843Xopendoar:2023-05-06T21:51:03Pensando - Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonarist
Ética solidária, para quê? Entre a Crítica e o “Social” como apontamentos ao populismo bolsonarista
title Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonarist
spellingShingle Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonarist
Sousa Assai, José Henrique
Teoria Crítica
Populismo
solidariedade
Filosofia Social
Filosofia política
critical theory
populism
solidarity
Political philosophy
Social philosophy
title_short Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonarist
title_full Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonarist
title_fullStr Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonarist
title_full_unstemmed Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonarist
title_sort Solidarity Ethics, but for what? Between Critique and “Das Soziale”: remarks about populism bolsonarist
author Sousa Assai, José Henrique
author_facet Sousa Assai, José Henrique
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sousa Assai, José Henrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Teoria Crítica
Populismo
solidariedade
Filosofia Social
Filosofia política
critical theory
populism
solidarity
Political philosophy
Social philosophy
topic Teoria Crítica
Populismo
solidariedade
Filosofia Social
Filosofia política
critical theory
populism
solidarity
Political philosophy
Social philosophy
description The basic scope of a Critical Theory is based on emancipation, which results from analysis, diagnosis, and a corrective attitude toward a social pathology. Taking this assumption into account, the current scenario of political Brazilian is rooted in populism which obliterates the constitutive elements of the “Social” understood as institutions, practices, and social relations. Under the mainstay of an “Aufklärung” of a critical theory of politics and based on the current Brazilian social and political context, I aim to explicit, in this research, the demand for an ethical and solidary conception as an answer to the social and political problems of “Bolsonarist” populism that undermines the “Social” sphere in Brazil. In this regard, I start from the basic idea that a critical theory should take on a decolonial thought as an assumption of its social and normative understanding (1). Considering (1), an immanent criticism of the current populism moves towards an ethical-solidary action as an attempt to correct this political “dasein” (2).
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/4064
10.26694/pensando.vol14i31.4064
url https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/4064
identifier_str_mv 10.26694/pensando.vol14i31.4064
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/4064/3635
https://periodicos.ufpi.br/index.php/pensando/article/view/4064/3646
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFPI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFPI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA; Vol. 14 No. 31 (2023): VARIA; 18-32
PENSANDO - REVUE DE PHILOSOPHIE; Vol. 14 No 31 (2023): VARIA; 18-32
PENSANDO - REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA; v. 14 n. 31 (2023): VARIA; 18-32
2178-843X
10.26694/pensando.vol14i31
reponame:Pensando
instname:Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)
instacron:UFPI
instname_str Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)
instacron_str UFPI
institution UFPI
reponame_str Pensando
collection Pensando
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pensando - Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.pensando@gmail.com
_version_ 1799755926611165184

Registros relacionados