Características vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Francescatto, Poliana
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca
Texto Completo: http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/2132
Resumo: Quince has been used as an alternative of rootstock for pear trees because of its dwarfing effect which allows better tree vigor control, fruiting precocity and yield influence. However, highlighting the issue of rootstock versus cultivar, some combinations show severe problems regarding graft incompatibility. The main characteristics seen by incompatible combinations are cell necrosis and vascular discontinuity at the graft interface, leading to a rupture of the union or a slow tree decline. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the influence of different quince and Pyrus calleryana on vegetative growth of pear trees through combination performance, scion x rootstock. The work was carried out at the Centro Agropecuário da Palma in Capão do Leão, RS, from March 2007 to March 2009. The assessed cultivars were Carrick, Packham s Triumph and Williams, and the rootstocks were: P. calleryana and the quinces Adams, Alaranjado, Alongado, BA29, Berreckzi, Champion, D Angers, D Vranja, De Patras, Du Lot, Inta267, MC, Meliforme, Pineapple, Portugal and Smyrna. Tree height, increment of tree height; canopy volume; rootstock, union and scion diameters; diameters increment of rootstock, union and scion; fresh pruning weight and specific leaf area. The rootstock P. calleryana showed superior vigor for the three cultivars whether compared with all evaluated quince rootstocks. Incompatibility between plants is not individually defined only by the overgrowth at the graft union. Both observation and comparison of the all tree characteristics due scion/rootstock combination is of fundamental importance to diagnose incompatibility. Tree height, canopy volume and fresh pruning weight are the representative variables of pear tree vigor. The cultivar Carrick showed reduced vigor (64% in relation to P. calleryana) and compatibility with the quince rootstocks (in descending order of vigor): ‗Inta267 , ‗D Vranja , ‗BA29 , ‗Champion , ‗Portugal , ‗Pineapple , ‗Adams , ‗MC , ‗Berreckzi and ‗Meliforme . ‗Alaranjado and ‗Du Lot were incompatible with this cultivar. The cultivar Packham s showed reduced vigor (46.5% in relation to P. calleryana) and compatibility with the quince rootstocks (in descending order of vigor): ‗Smyrna , ‗D Angers and ‗Alongado . ‗Adams was incompatible with this cultivar. The cultivar Williams showed reduced vigor (60.4% in relation to P. calleryana) and compatibility only with the quince rootstocks (in descending order of vigor): 'Champion , ‗Meliforme and 'Du Lot . ‗BA29 , 'Smyrna , ‗Berreckzi , 'D Vranja , ‗De Patras and ‗MC were incompatible with this cultivar.
id UFPL_33853277dffc9d208ac0169d797eb588
oai_identifier_str oai:guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br:123456789/2132
network_acronym_str UFPL
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca
repository_id_str
spelling http://lattes.cnpq.br/0700480915666233http://lattes.cnpq.br/1832005293007635Rufato, Andrea de Rossihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8465804504704254Fachinello, José CarlosFrancescatto, Poliana2014-08-20T14:22:08Z2011-03-282014-08-20T14:22:08Z2009-06-12FRANCESCATTO, Poliana. Vegetative characteristics of pear trees grafted on quince and Pyrus calleryana.. 2009. 121 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, 2009.http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/2132Quince has been used as an alternative of rootstock for pear trees because of its dwarfing effect which allows better tree vigor control, fruiting precocity and yield influence. However, highlighting the issue of rootstock versus cultivar, some combinations show severe problems regarding graft incompatibility. The main characteristics seen by incompatible combinations are cell necrosis and vascular discontinuity at the graft interface, leading to a rupture of the union or a slow tree decline. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the influence of different quince and Pyrus calleryana on vegetative growth of pear trees through combination performance, scion x rootstock. The work was carried out at the Centro Agropecuário da Palma in Capão do Leão, RS, from March 2007 to March 2009. The assessed cultivars were Carrick, Packham s Triumph and Williams, and the rootstocks were: P. calleryana and the quinces Adams, Alaranjado, Alongado, BA29, Berreckzi, Champion, D Angers, D Vranja, De Patras, Du Lot, Inta267, MC, Meliforme, Pineapple, Portugal and Smyrna. Tree height, increment of tree height; canopy volume; rootstock, union and scion diameters; diameters increment of rootstock, union and scion; fresh pruning weight and specific leaf area. The rootstock P. calleryana showed superior vigor for the three cultivars whether compared with all evaluated quince rootstocks. Incompatibility between plants is not individually defined only by the overgrowth at the graft union. Both observation and comparison of the all tree characteristics due scion/rootstock combination is of fundamental importance to diagnose incompatibility. Tree height, canopy volume and fresh pruning weight are the representative variables of pear tree vigor. The cultivar Carrick showed reduced vigor (64% in relation to P. calleryana) and compatibility with the quince rootstocks (in descending order of vigor): ‗Inta267 , ‗D Vranja , ‗BA29 , ‗Champion , ‗Portugal , ‗Pineapple , ‗Adams , ‗MC , ‗Berreckzi and ‗Meliforme . ‗Alaranjado and ‗Du Lot were incompatible with this cultivar. The cultivar Packham s showed reduced vigor (46.5% in relation to P. calleryana) and compatibility with the quince rootstocks (in descending order of vigor): ‗Smyrna , ‗D Angers and ‗Alongado . ‗Adams was incompatible with this cultivar. The cultivar Williams showed reduced vigor (60.4% in relation to P. calleryana) and compatibility only with the quince rootstocks (in descending order of vigor): 'Champion , ‗Meliforme and 'Du Lot . ‗BA29 , 'Smyrna , ‗Berreckzi , 'D Vranja , ‗De Patras and ‗MC were incompatible with this cultivar.O marmeleiro é usado como uma alternativa de porta-enxerto para pereiras por possuir efeito ananizante, permitindo melhor controle do vigor da planta, e por induzir precocidade na frutificação e produtividade. No entanto, considerando o assunto porta-enxerto versus cultivar, algumas combinações apresentam sérios problemas de incompatibilidade de enxertia. As principais características mostradas pelas combinações incompatíveis são necrose celular e descontinuidade vascular na interface do enxerto, a qual leva a uma ruptura da união ou um lento declínio da planta. Neste contexto o projeto teve por objetivo avaliar a influência de diferentes porta-enxertos de marmeleiros e Pyrus calleryana sobre o crescimento vegetativo de plantas de pereira através do comportamento da respectiva combinação copa x porta-enxerto. O trabalho foi desenvolvido no Centro Agropecuário da Palma, Capão do Leão, RS, no período de março de 2007 a março de 2009. As cultivares testadas foram Carrick, Packham s Triumph e Williams, e os porta-enxertos: P. calleryana e os marmeleiros Adams, Alaranjado, Alongado, BA29, Berreckzi, Champion, D Angers, D Vranja, De Patras, Du Lot, Inta267, MC, Meliforme, Pineapple, Portugal e Smyrna. As variáveis avaliadas foram altura de planta; incremento de altura de planta; volume de copa; diâmetro de tronco do porta-enxerto, da cv. copa e do ponto de enxertia; incremento do diâmetro do tronco; massa verde de poda e área foliar específica. O porta-enxerto de pereira P. calleryana mostrou-se superior em vigor se comparado com todos os marmeleiros estudados para todas as cultivares. A incompatibilidade entre plantas não é definida, isoladamente, apenas pelo engrossamento na união de enxertia. A observação e comparação conjunta das características da planta, devido a combinação copa/porta-enxerto é de fundamental importância para diagnosticar incompatibilidade. Altura de planta, volume de copa e massa verde de poda foram as variáveis representativas de vigor de pereiras. A cultivar Carrick apresentou vigor reduzido (64% em relação a P. calleryana) e compatibilidade com os porta-enxertos de marmeleiros (em ordem decrescente de vigor): ‗Inta267 , ‗D Vranja , ‗BA29 , ‗Champion , ‗Portugal , ‗Pineapple , ‗Adams , ‗MC , ‗Berreckzi e ‗Meliforme . Os porta-enxertos ‗Alaranjado e ‗Du Lot foram incompatíveis com esta cultivar. A cultivar Packham s apresentou vigor reduzido (46,5% em relação a P. calleryana) e compatibilidade com os porta-enxertos de marmeleiros (em ordem decrescente de vigor): ‗Smyrna , ‗D Angers e ‗Alongado . O porta-enxerto ‗Adams foi incompatível com esta cultivar. A cultivar Williams apresentou vigor reduzido (60,4% em relação a P. calleryana) e compatibilidade apenas com os porta-enxertos de marmeleiros (em ordem decrescente de vigor): 'Champion , ‗Meliforme e 'Du Lot . Os porta-enxertos ‗BA29 , 'Smyrna , ‗Berreckzi , 'D Vranja , ‗De Patras e ‗MC foram incompatíveis com esta cultivar.application/pdfporUniversidade Federal de PelotasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em AgronomiaUFPelBRFaculdade de Agronomia Eliseu MacielPyrusCydoniaIncompatibilidade de enxertiaCrescimento vegetativoGraft incompatibilityVegetative growthCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIACaracterísticas vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.Vegetative characteristics of pear trees grafted on quince and Pyrus calleryana.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiacainstname:Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)instacron:UFPELORIGINALDissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdfapplication/pdf2354601http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2132/1/Dissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdff9edc628e12d95fd04503d6e3013ba1fMD51open accessTEXTDissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdf.txtDissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain199594http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2132/2/Dissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdf.txtde627f069dcdb3e60f1fb2652db011b5MD52open accessTHUMBNAILDissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdf.jpgDissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1328http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2132/3/Dissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdf.jpgfd0cfe4ab44ef7a637d650327609adfcMD53open access123456789/21322023-05-15 19:33:46.217open accessoai:guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br:123456789/2132Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.ufpel.edu.br/oai/requestrippel@ufpel.edu.br || repositorio@ufpel.edu.br || aline.batista@ufpel.edu.bropendoar:2023-05-15T22:33:46Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca - Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Características vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Vegetative characteristics of pear trees grafted on quince and Pyrus calleryana.
title Características vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.
spellingShingle Características vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.
Francescatto, Poliana
Pyrus
Cydonia
Incompatibilidade de enxertia
Crescimento vegetativo
Graft incompatibility
Vegetative growth
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
title_short Características vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.
title_full Características vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.
title_fullStr Características vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.
title_full_unstemmed Características vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.
title_sort Características vegetativas de pereiras enxertadas sobre marmeleiro e Pyrus calleryana.
author Francescatto, Poliana
author_facet Francescatto, Poliana
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorLattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0700480915666233
dc.contributor.advisorLattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/1832005293007635
dc.contributor.advisor-co1.fl_str_mv Rufato, Andrea de Rossi
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8465804504704254
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Fachinello, José Carlos
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Francescatto, Poliana
contributor_str_mv Rufato, Andrea de Rossi
Fachinello, José Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pyrus
Cydonia
Incompatibilidade de enxertia
Crescimento vegetativo
topic Pyrus
Cydonia
Incompatibilidade de enxertia
Crescimento vegetativo
Graft incompatibility
Vegetative growth
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Graft incompatibility
Vegetative growth
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::AGRONOMIA
description Quince has been used as an alternative of rootstock for pear trees because of its dwarfing effect which allows better tree vigor control, fruiting precocity and yield influence. However, highlighting the issue of rootstock versus cultivar, some combinations show severe problems regarding graft incompatibility. The main characteristics seen by incompatible combinations are cell necrosis and vascular discontinuity at the graft interface, leading to a rupture of the union or a slow tree decline. Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the influence of different quince and Pyrus calleryana on vegetative growth of pear trees through combination performance, scion x rootstock. The work was carried out at the Centro Agropecuário da Palma in Capão do Leão, RS, from March 2007 to March 2009. The assessed cultivars were Carrick, Packham s Triumph and Williams, and the rootstocks were: P. calleryana and the quinces Adams, Alaranjado, Alongado, BA29, Berreckzi, Champion, D Angers, D Vranja, De Patras, Du Lot, Inta267, MC, Meliforme, Pineapple, Portugal and Smyrna. Tree height, increment of tree height; canopy volume; rootstock, union and scion diameters; diameters increment of rootstock, union and scion; fresh pruning weight and specific leaf area. The rootstock P. calleryana showed superior vigor for the three cultivars whether compared with all evaluated quince rootstocks. Incompatibility between plants is not individually defined only by the overgrowth at the graft union. Both observation and comparison of the all tree characteristics due scion/rootstock combination is of fundamental importance to diagnose incompatibility. Tree height, canopy volume and fresh pruning weight are the representative variables of pear tree vigor. The cultivar Carrick showed reduced vigor (64% in relation to P. calleryana) and compatibility with the quince rootstocks (in descending order of vigor): ‗Inta267 , ‗D Vranja , ‗BA29 , ‗Champion , ‗Portugal , ‗Pineapple , ‗Adams , ‗MC , ‗Berreckzi and ‗Meliforme . ‗Alaranjado and ‗Du Lot were incompatible with this cultivar. The cultivar Packham s showed reduced vigor (46.5% in relation to P. calleryana) and compatibility with the quince rootstocks (in descending order of vigor): ‗Smyrna , ‗D Angers and ‗Alongado . ‗Adams was incompatible with this cultivar. The cultivar Williams showed reduced vigor (60.4% in relation to P. calleryana) and compatibility only with the quince rootstocks (in descending order of vigor): 'Champion , ‗Meliforme and 'Du Lot . ‗BA29 , 'Smyrna , ‗Berreckzi , 'D Vranja , ‗De Patras and ‗MC were incompatible with this cultivar.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2009-06-12
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2011-03-28
2014-08-20T14:22:08Z
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-08-20T14:22:08Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv FRANCESCATTO, Poliana. Vegetative characteristics of pear trees grafted on quince and Pyrus calleryana.. 2009. 121 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, 2009.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/2132
identifier_str_mv FRANCESCATTO, Poliana. Vegetative characteristics of pear trees grafted on quince and Pyrus calleryana.. 2009. 121 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia) - Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, 2009.
url http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/handle/123456789/2132
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Pelotas
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFPel
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Pelotas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca
instname:Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)
instacron:UFPEL
instname_str Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)
instacron_str UFPEL
institution UFPEL
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca
collection Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2132/1/Dissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdf
http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2132/2/Dissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdf.txt
http://guaiaca.ufpel.edu.br/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/2132/3/Dissertacao_Poliana_Francescatto.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f9edc628e12d95fd04503d6e3013ba1f
de627f069dcdb3e60f1fb2652db011b5
fd0cfe4ab44ef7a637d650327609adfc
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFPel - Guaiaca - Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rippel@ufpel.edu.br || repositorio@ufpel.edu.br || aline.batista@ufpel.edu.br
_version_ 1813710155839176704