Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Søndergaard, Niels
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Sociologia e Política
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/78516
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: The article analyses domestic reactions to Chinese land deals in Brazil, Argentina and Bolivia, and how such attempts have affected these countries’ regulatory framework for foreign land acquisitions. Materials and Methods: Mobilizations against these deals are examined with focus on their internal composition of social forces, and the framings which they produce in order to press for regulatory restrictions. Results: The emergence of protest in Argentina and Brazil, relative to the lack of opposition in Bolivia, is explained through a most similar case design, emphasizing differences in the rural socio-economic structure and composition of capital within the agricultural sector as central explanatory factors, accounting for the variation of the outcome in the cases examined. Discussion: With point of departure in the debate about global land investment, the article contributes to understanding how foreign investment is accommodated within different modes of commodity dependent development.KEYWORDS: Land governance; South America; Land conflict; China; Agribusiness.
id UFPR-10_350c3af4e693e2ab5562b0e8d6c90aa0
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/78516
network_acronym_str UFPR-10
network_name_str Revista de Sociologia e Política
repository_id_str
spelling Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutionsABSTRACT Introduction: The article analyses domestic reactions to Chinese land deals in Brazil, Argentina and Bolivia, and how such attempts have affected these countries’ regulatory framework for foreign land acquisitions. Materials and Methods: Mobilizations against these deals are examined with focus on their internal composition of social forces, and the framings which they produce in order to press for regulatory restrictions. Results: The emergence of protest in Argentina and Brazil, relative to the lack of opposition in Bolivia, is explained through a most similar case design, emphasizing differences in the rural socio-economic structure and composition of capital within the agricultural sector as central explanatory factors, accounting for the variation of the outcome in the cases examined. Discussion: With point of departure in the debate about global land investment, the article contributes to understanding how foreign investment is accommodated within different modes of commodity dependent development.KEYWORDS: Land governance; South America; Land conflict; China; Agribusiness.UFPRSøndergaard, Niels2020-12-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/78516Revista de Sociologia e Política; v. 28, n. 74 (2020): JUNHO; 1-201678-98730104-4478reponame:Revista de Sociologia e Políticainstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/78516/42351Direitos autorais 2020 Revista de Sociologia e Políticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-15T21:05:42Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/78516Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rspPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/oai||editoriarsp@ufpr.br1678-98730104-4478opendoar:2020-12-15T21:05:42Revista de Sociologia e Política - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutions
title Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutions
spellingShingle Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutions
Søndergaard, Niels
title_short Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutions
title_full Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutions
title_fullStr Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutions
title_full_unstemmed Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutions
title_sort Repercussions of Chinese land deals in South America: vectors of mobilization and domestic institutions
author Søndergaard, Niels
author_facet Søndergaard, Niels
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Søndergaard, Niels
description ABSTRACT Introduction: The article analyses domestic reactions to Chinese land deals in Brazil, Argentina and Bolivia, and how such attempts have affected these countries’ regulatory framework for foreign land acquisitions. Materials and Methods: Mobilizations against these deals are examined with focus on their internal composition of social forces, and the framings which they produce in order to press for regulatory restrictions. Results: The emergence of protest in Argentina and Brazil, relative to the lack of opposition in Bolivia, is explained through a most similar case design, emphasizing differences in the rural socio-economic structure and composition of capital within the agricultural sector as central explanatory factors, accounting for the variation of the outcome in the cases examined. Discussion: With point of departure in the debate about global land investment, the article contributes to understanding how foreign investment is accommodated within different modes of commodity dependent development.KEYWORDS: Land governance; South America; Land conflict; China; Agribusiness.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/78516
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/78516
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/rsp/article/view/78516/42351
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Revista de Sociologia e Política
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Revista de Sociologia e Política
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Sociologia e Política; v. 28, n. 74 (2020): JUNHO; 1-20
1678-9873
0104-4478
reponame:Revista de Sociologia e Política
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista de Sociologia e Política
collection Revista de Sociologia e Política
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Sociologia e Política - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||editoriarsp@ufpr.br
_version_ 1799761023593349120