Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalization
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1710 |
Resumo: | In a functionalist approach to grammar (cf. GIVÓN, 2001; 2018), the work aims (i) to present a qualitative and quantitative description of the range of functions performed by bem (well) and bom (good), considering both the prototypical grammatical status of adverb and adjective, respectively, as for the discursive uses as markers and other possible uses, from the examination of dialogical contexts in 72 sociolinguistic interviews (VARSUL Project); (ii) to treat comparatively the discursive uses, seeking contextual patterns of behavior; and (iii) to analyze the changes involved such as instances of grammaticalization (cf. HIMMELMANN, 2004; TRAUGOTT, 2010a; DIEWALD (2011b). Among the results we highlight: (i) in terms of frequency, the adverbial use of bem is greater than the adjetival use of bom; as a discourse marker, bom is more widely used than bem; and in other uses, bem presents a more polysemic behavior than bom; (ii) as discourse markers, the items share a general textual / interpersonal property and they signal a double movement (of discursive structuring and negotiation), with significant occurrence introducing immediate responses, but they present contextual specificities of use: while bom predominates in opening shifts, introducing particularly preamble, bem prevails in intraturn positions, in contexts of topical organization, especially of sequencing and resuming the discursive flow, focusing on the informant's own speech; (iii) the markers present different contextual patterns in the informant's speech and in the interviewer's speech. It is concluded that the functioning of the items is dependent on the type of communicative situation and the need for the analysis to consider textual / discursive genres and their particularities is pointed out, especially in comparative studies. |
id |
UFPR-12_691465e067ae78c733f83e35a91f3960 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1710 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalizationEspectro funcional de bem e bom no português falado: instâncias de gramaticalizaçãoVARSULContextos dialógicosMultifuncionalidadeBem e bomGramaticalizaçãoVARSULDialogical contextsMultifunctionalityBem (well) and bom (good)GrammaticalizationIn a functionalist approach to grammar (cf. GIVÓN, 2001; 2018), the work aims (i) to present a qualitative and quantitative description of the range of functions performed by bem (well) and bom (good), considering both the prototypical grammatical status of adverb and adjective, respectively, as for the discursive uses as markers and other possible uses, from the examination of dialogical contexts in 72 sociolinguistic interviews (VARSUL Project); (ii) to treat comparatively the discursive uses, seeking contextual patterns of behavior; and (iii) to analyze the changes involved such as instances of grammaticalization (cf. HIMMELMANN, 2004; TRAUGOTT, 2010a; DIEWALD (2011b). Among the results we highlight: (i) in terms of frequency, the adverbial use of bem is greater than the adjetival use of bom; as a discourse marker, bom is more widely used than bem; and in other uses, bem presents a more polysemic behavior than bom; (ii) as discourse markers, the items share a general textual / interpersonal property and they signal a double movement (of discursive structuring and negotiation), with significant occurrence introducing immediate responses, but they present contextual specificities of use: while bom predominates in opening shifts, introducing particularly preamble, bem prevails in intraturn positions, in contexts of topical organization, especially of sequencing and resuming the discursive flow, focusing on the informant's own speech; (iii) the markers present different contextual patterns in the informant's speech and in the interviewer's speech. It is concluded that the functioning of the items is dependent on the type of communicative situation and the need for the analysis to consider textual / discursive genres and their particularities is pointed out, especially in comparative studies.Numa abordagem funcionalista de gramática (cf. GIVÓN, 2001; 2018), o trabalho objetiva (i) apresentar uma descrição qualitativa e quantitativa do leque de funções desempenhadas por bem e bom, considerando tanto o estatuto gramatical prototípico de advérbio e adjetivo, respectivamente, quanto os usos discursivos como marcadores e outros possíveis usos, a partir do exame de situações dialógicas em 72 entrevistas sociolinguísticas (Projeto VARSUL); (ii) tratar comparativamente os usos discursivos, buscando padrões contextuais de comportamento; e (iii) analisar as mudanças envolvidas como instâncias de gramaticalização (cf. HIMMELMANN, 2004; TRAUGOTT, 2010a; DIEWALD (2011b). Entre os resultados destacam-se: (i) em termos frequenciais, o uso de bem adverbial é significativamente maior que o uso de bom adjetival; como marcador discursivo, bom é largamente mais usado que bem; e em outros usos, bem supera bom, apresentando um comportamento mais polissêmico; (ii) como marcadores discursivos, os itens compartilham uma propriedade geral textual/interpessoal e sinalizam um duplo movimento (de estruturação discursiva e de negociação), com presença significativa encabeçando respostas imediatas, mas apresentam especificidades contextuais de uso: enquanto bom predomina em abertura de turno, particularmente introduzindo preâmbulo, bem prevalece em posições intraturno, em contextos de organização tópica, especialmente de sequenciação e retomada do fluxo discursivo, incidindo sobre a fala do próprio informante; (iii) os marcadores apresentam padrões contextuais distintos na fala do informante e na fala do entrevistador. Conclui-se que o funcionamento dos itens é dependente do tipo de situação comunicativa e aponta-se a necessidade de as análises considerarem os gêneros textuais/ discursivos e suas particularidades, especialmente em estudos comparativos. Associação Brasileira de Linguística2020-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDossiê temáticotextoapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/171010.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1710Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 131-158Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 131-1580102-715810.25189/rabralin.v19i3reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1710/1894https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1710/2018Copyright (c) 2020 Edair Maria Gorskiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGorski, Edair Maria2021-01-22T13:40:32Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1710Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2021-01-22T13:40:32Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalization Espectro funcional de bem e bom no português falado: instâncias de gramaticalização |
title |
Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalization |
spellingShingle |
Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalization Gorski, Edair Maria VARSUL Contextos dialógicos Multifuncionalidade Bem e bom Gramaticalização VARSUL Dialogical contexts Multifunctionality Bem (well) and bom (good) Grammaticalization |
title_short |
Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalization |
title_full |
Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalization |
title_fullStr |
Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalization |
title_sort |
Functional spectrum of bem (well) and bom (good) in spoken portuguese: instances of grammaticalization |
author |
Gorski, Edair Maria |
author_facet |
Gorski, Edair Maria |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gorski, Edair Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
VARSUL Contextos dialógicos Multifuncionalidade Bem e bom Gramaticalização VARSUL Dialogical contexts Multifunctionality Bem (well) and bom (good) Grammaticalization |
topic |
VARSUL Contextos dialógicos Multifuncionalidade Bem e bom Gramaticalização VARSUL Dialogical contexts Multifunctionality Bem (well) and bom (good) Grammaticalization |
description |
In a functionalist approach to grammar (cf. GIVÓN, 2001; 2018), the work aims (i) to present a qualitative and quantitative description of the range of functions performed by bem (well) and bom (good), considering both the prototypical grammatical status of adverb and adjective, respectively, as for the discursive uses as markers and other possible uses, from the examination of dialogical contexts in 72 sociolinguistic interviews (VARSUL Project); (ii) to treat comparatively the discursive uses, seeking contextual patterns of behavior; and (iii) to analyze the changes involved such as instances of grammaticalization (cf. HIMMELMANN, 2004; TRAUGOTT, 2010a; DIEWALD (2011b). Among the results we highlight: (i) in terms of frequency, the adverbial use of bem is greater than the adjetival use of bom; as a discourse marker, bom is more widely used than bem; and in other uses, bem presents a more polysemic behavior than bom; (ii) as discourse markers, the items share a general textual / interpersonal property and they signal a double movement (of discursive structuring and negotiation), with significant occurrence introducing immediate responses, but they present contextual specificities of use: while bom predominates in opening shifts, introducing particularly preamble, bem prevails in intraturn positions, in contexts of topical organization, especially of sequencing and resuming the discursive flow, focusing on the informant's own speech; (iii) the markers present different contextual patterns in the informant's speech and in the interviewer's speech. It is concluded that the functioning of the items is dependent on the type of communicative situation and the need for the analysis to consider textual / discursive genres and their particularities is pointed out, especially in comparative studies. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Dossiê temático texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1710 10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1710 |
url |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1710 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25189/rabralin.v19i3.1710 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1710/1894 https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1710/2018 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Edair Maria Gorski info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Edair Maria Gorski |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 131-158 Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 3 (2020); 131-158 0102-7158 10.25189/rabralin.v19i3 reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org |
_version_ |
1798329771298390016 |