The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Langa Lacerda, Marcela
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Görski, Edair Maria, Paza, Carla Regina Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070
Resumo: The systematization of the studies of variationist sociolinguistics in three waves (ECKERT, 2012), or phases, organizes in a way the work that has been carried out in the area since the 1960s. Refining this systematization, this article aims to discuss the epistemological (and therefore theoretical-methodological) (in)adequacy of the approximation between the waves based on favorable and unfavorable arguments to the idea of continuity/ complementarity between the phases. This investigation has an interpretative nature, constitutes a bibliographic research and examines Eckert (2000; 2008; 2012; 2016a; 2016b; 2018), Labov (2001, 2010), Eckert and Rickford (2001), Coupland (2001; 2007, 2014); Camacho (2013; 2015) Bell (2001; 2014; 2016), Eckert and Labov (2017), Hernández-Campoy (2019; 2020), among other authors. The reflections point to the possibility of two different interpretations about the relatioship established between the different variationist phases: on the one hand, one interpretation is that there is an epistemological continuum between the three phases, so that its assumptions would be integrated in the third wave, leading to a robust theory of variation; on the other hand, another interpretation is that there is no epistemological continuum between the three phases, since the first phase would harmonize with procedures of a structural approach and the third phase would harmonize with procedures of an antropological-discursive approach, leading to a robust theory of variation by the aspects that are constitutive to its (and not by an integration of assumptions of the three phases). In view of the discussion carried out, we highlight that is relevant for the area to consider this controversial metatheoretical point.   
id UFPR-12_6a8945af5c93b0ca3504cf2a557e53c1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/2070
network_acronym_str UFPR-12
network_name_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?A Terceira onda variacionista: continuidade ou descontinuidade de fases?Fases variacionistasEpistemologiaContinuidadeDescontinuidadeVariatinist phasesEpistemologyContinuityDiscontinuityThe systematization of the studies of variationist sociolinguistics in three waves (ECKERT, 2012), or phases, organizes in a way the work that has been carried out in the area since the 1960s. Refining this systematization, this article aims to discuss the epistemological (and therefore theoretical-methodological) (in)adequacy of the approximation between the waves based on favorable and unfavorable arguments to the idea of continuity/ complementarity between the phases. This investigation has an interpretative nature, constitutes a bibliographic research and examines Eckert (2000; 2008; 2012; 2016a; 2016b; 2018), Labov (2001, 2010), Eckert and Rickford (2001), Coupland (2001; 2007, 2014); Camacho (2013; 2015) Bell (2001; 2014; 2016), Eckert and Labov (2017), Hernández-Campoy (2019; 2020), among other authors. The reflections point to the possibility of two different interpretations about the relatioship established between the different variationist phases: on the one hand, one interpretation is that there is an epistemological continuum between the three phases, so that its assumptions would be integrated in the third wave, leading to a robust theory of variation; on the other hand, another interpretation is that there is no epistemological continuum between the three phases, since the first phase would harmonize with procedures of a structural approach and the third phase would harmonize with procedures of an antropological-discursive approach, leading to a robust theory of variation by the aspects that are constitutive to its (and not by an integration of assumptions of the three phases). In view of the discussion carried out, we highlight that is relevant for the area to consider this controversial metatheoretical point.   A sistematização dos estudos da sociolinguística variacionista em três ondas (ECKERT, 2012), ou fases, organiza, de certo modo, os trabalhos que vêm sendo realizados na área desde a década de 1960. Refinando essa sistematização, este artigo objetiva discutir a (in)adequação epistemológica (e teórico-metodológica, por conseguinte) da aproximação entre as ondas com base em argumentos favoráveis e desfavoráveis à ideia de continuidade/complementariedade entre as fases. De cunho interpretativista, esta investigação constitui-se como pesquisa bibliográfica e examina Eckert (2000; 2008; 2012; 2016a; 2016b; 2018), Labov (2001, 2010), Eckert e Rickford (2001), Coupland (2001; 2007, 2014); Camacho (2013; 2015) Bell (2001; 2014; 2016), Eckert e Labov (2017), Hernández-Campoy (2019; 2020), dentre outros autores. As reflexões apontam para a possibilidade de duas diferentes interpretações sobre a relação que se estabele entre as diferentes fases variacionistas: por um lado, a de que há um continuum epistemológico entre as três fases, de modo que seus preceitos se encontrariam integrados, na terceira onda, ensejando uma  teoria de variação robusta; por outro lado, a de que “não” há um continuum epistemológico entre as três fases, uma vez que a primeira fase se harmonizaria com procedimentos de uma abordagem estrutural e a terceira fase, com procedimentos de uma abordagem antropológico-discursiva, ensejando, essa última, uma teoria de variação robusta pelos aspectos que lhe são constitutivos (e não por uma integração de preceitos das três fases). Diante da discussão desenvolvida, destacamos a relevância de a área se debruçar sobre esse controverso ponto metateórico.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2023-01-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/207010.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2070Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 1 (2022)Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 1 (2022)0102-715810.25189/rabralin.v21i1reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070/2672Copyright (c) 2023 Marcela Langa Lacerda, Edair Maria Görski, Carla Regina Martins Pazahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLanga Lacerda, Marcela Görski, Edair MariaPaza, Carla Regina Martins2023-06-09T17:21:16Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/2070Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2023-06-09T17:21:16Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?
A Terceira onda variacionista: continuidade ou descontinuidade de fases?
title The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?
spellingShingle The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?
Langa Lacerda, Marcela
Fases variacionistas
Epistemologia
Continuidade
Descontinuidade
Variatinist phases
Epistemology
Continuity
Discontinuity
title_short The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?
title_full The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?
title_fullStr The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?
title_full_unstemmed The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?
title_sort The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?
author Langa Lacerda, Marcela
author_facet Langa Lacerda, Marcela
Görski, Edair Maria
Paza, Carla Regina Martins
author_role author
author2 Görski, Edair Maria
Paza, Carla Regina Martins
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Langa Lacerda, Marcela
Görski, Edair Maria
Paza, Carla Regina Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fases variacionistas
Epistemologia
Continuidade
Descontinuidade
Variatinist phases
Epistemology
Continuity
Discontinuity
topic Fases variacionistas
Epistemologia
Continuidade
Descontinuidade
Variatinist phases
Epistemology
Continuity
Discontinuity
description The systematization of the studies of variationist sociolinguistics in three waves (ECKERT, 2012), or phases, organizes in a way the work that has been carried out in the area since the 1960s. Refining this systematization, this article aims to discuss the epistemological (and therefore theoretical-methodological) (in)adequacy of the approximation between the waves based on favorable and unfavorable arguments to the idea of continuity/ complementarity between the phases. This investigation has an interpretative nature, constitutes a bibliographic research and examines Eckert (2000; 2008; 2012; 2016a; 2016b; 2018), Labov (2001, 2010), Eckert and Rickford (2001), Coupland (2001; 2007, 2014); Camacho (2013; 2015) Bell (2001; 2014; 2016), Eckert and Labov (2017), Hernández-Campoy (2019; 2020), among other authors. The reflections point to the possibility of two different interpretations about the relatioship established between the different variationist phases: on the one hand, one interpretation is that there is an epistemological continuum between the three phases, so that its assumptions would be integrated in the third wave, leading to a robust theory of variation; on the other hand, another interpretation is that there is no epistemological continuum between the three phases, since the first phase would harmonize with procedures of a structural approach and the third phase would harmonize with procedures of an antropological-discursive approach, leading to a robust theory of variation by the aspects that are constitutive to its (and not by an integration of assumptions of the three phases). In view of the discussion carried out, we highlight that is relevant for the area to consider this controversial metatheoretical point.   
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070
10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2070
url https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070
identifier_str_mv 10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2070
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070/2672
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Marcela Langa Lacerda, Edair Maria Görski, Carla Regina Martins Paza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Marcela Langa Lacerda, Edair Maria Görski, Carla Regina Martins Paza
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Linguística
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 1 (2022)
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 1 (2022)
0102-7158
10.25189/rabralin.v21i1
reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
collection Revista da ABRALIN (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org
_version_ 1798329768214528000