The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070 |
Resumo: | The systematization of the studies of variationist sociolinguistics in three waves (ECKERT, 2012), or phases, organizes in a way the work that has been carried out in the area since the 1960s. Refining this systematization, this article aims to discuss the epistemological (and therefore theoretical-methodological) (in)adequacy of the approximation between the waves based on favorable and unfavorable arguments to the idea of continuity/ complementarity between the phases. This investigation has an interpretative nature, constitutes a bibliographic research and examines Eckert (2000; 2008; 2012; 2016a; 2016b; 2018), Labov (2001, 2010), Eckert and Rickford (2001), Coupland (2001; 2007, 2014); Camacho (2013; 2015) Bell (2001; 2014; 2016), Eckert and Labov (2017), Hernández-Campoy (2019; 2020), among other authors. The reflections point to the possibility of two different interpretations about the relatioship established between the different variationist phases: on the one hand, one interpretation is that there is an epistemological continuum between the three phases, so that its assumptions would be integrated in the third wave, leading to a robust theory of variation; on the other hand, another interpretation is that there is no epistemological continuum between the three phases, since the first phase would harmonize with procedures of a structural approach and the third phase would harmonize with procedures of an antropological-discursive approach, leading to a robust theory of variation by the aspects that are constitutive to its (and not by an integration of assumptions of the three phases). In view of the discussion carried out, we highlight that is relevant for the area to consider this controversial metatheoretical point. |
id |
UFPR-12_6a8945af5c93b0ca3504cf2a557e53c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/2070 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases?A Terceira onda variacionista: continuidade ou descontinuidade de fases?Fases variacionistasEpistemologiaContinuidadeDescontinuidadeVariatinist phasesEpistemologyContinuityDiscontinuityThe systematization of the studies of variationist sociolinguistics in three waves (ECKERT, 2012), or phases, organizes in a way the work that has been carried out in the area since the 1960s. Refining this systematization, this article aims to discuss the epistemological (and therefore theoretical-methodological) (in)adequacy of the approximation between the waves based on favorable and unfavorable arguments to the idea of continuity/ complementarity between the phases. This investigation has an interpretative nature, constitutes a bibliographic research and examines Eckert (2000; 2008; 2012; 2016a; 2016b; 2018), Labov (2001, 2010), Eckert and Rickford (2001), Coupland (2001; 2007, 2014); Camacho (2013; 2015) Bell (2001; 2014; 2016), Eckert and Labov (2017), Hernández-Campoy (2019; 2020), among other authors. The reflections point to the possibility of two different interpretations about the relatioship established between the different variationist phases: on the one hand, one interpretation is that there is an epistemological continuum between the three phases, so that its assumptions would be integrated in the third wave, leading to a robust theory of variation; on the other hand, another interpretation is that there is no epistemological continuum between the three phases, since the first phase would harmonize with procedures of a structural approach and the third phase would harmonize with procedures of an antropological-discursive approach, leading to a robust theory of variation by the aspects that are constitutive to its (and not by an integration of assumptions of the three phases). In view of the discussion carried out, we highlight that is relevant for the area to consider this controversial metatheoretical point. A sistematização dos estudos da sociolinguística variacionista em três ondas (ECKERT, 2012), ou fases, organiza, de certo modo, os trabalhos que vêm sendo realizados na área desde a década de 1960. Refinando essa sistematização, este artigo objetiva discutir a (in)adequação epistemológica (e teórico-metodológica, por conseguinte) da aproximação entre as ondas com base em argumentos favoráveis e desfavoráveis à ideia de continuidade/complementariedade entre as fases. De cunho interpretativista, esta investigação constitui-se como pesquisa bibliográfica e examina Eckert (2000; 2008; 2012; 2016a; 2016b; 2018), Labov (2001, 2010), Eckert e Rickford (2001), Coupland (2001; 2007, 2014); Camacho (2013; 2015) Bell (2001; 2014; 2016), Eckert e Labov (2017), Hernández-Campoy (2019; 2020), dentre outros autores. As reflexões apontam para a possibilidade de duas diferentes interpretações sobre a relação que se estabele entre as diferentes fases variacionistas: por um lado, a de que há um continuum epistemológico entre as três fases, de modo que seus preceitos se encontrariam integrados, na terceira onda, ensejando uma teoria de variação robusta; por outro lado, a de que “não” há um continuum epistemológico entre as três fases, uma vez que a primeira fase se harmonizaria com procedimentos de uma abordagem estrutural e a terceira fase, com procedimentos de uma abordagem antropológico-discursiva, ensejando, essa última, uma teoria de variação robusta pelos aspectos que lhe são constitutivos (e não por uma integração de preceitos das três fases). Diante da discussão desenvolvida, destacamos a relevância de a área se debruçar sobre esse controverso ponto metateórico.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2023-01-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/207010.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2070Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 1 (2022)Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 1 (2022)0102-715810.25189/rabralin.v21i1reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070/2672Copyright (c) 2023 Marcela Langa Lacerda, Edair Maria Görski, Carla Regina Martins Pazahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLanga Lacerda, Marcela Görski, Edair MariaPaza, Carla Regina Martins2023-06-09T17:21:16Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/2070Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2023-06-09T17:21:16Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases? A Terceira onda variacionista: continuidade ou descontinuidade de fases? |
title |
The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases? |
spellingShingle |
The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases? Langa Lacerda, Marcela Fases variacionistas Epistemologia Continuidade Descontinuidade Variatinist phases Epistemology Continuity Discontinuity |
title_short |
The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases? |
title_full |
The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases? |
title_fullStr |
The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases? |
title_full_unstemmed |
The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases? |
title_sort |
The third variationist wave: continuity or discontinuity of phases? |
author |
Langa Lacerda, Marcela |
author_facet |
Langa Lacerda, Marcela Görski, Edair Maria Paza, Carla Regina Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Görski, Edair Maria Paza, Carla Regina Martins |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Langa Lacerda, Marcela Görski, Edair Maria Paza, Carla Regina Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Fases variacionistas Epistemologia Continuidade Descontinuidade Variatinist phases Epistemology Continuity Discontinuity |
topic |
Fases variacionistas Epistemologia Continuidade Descontinuidade Variatinist phases Epistemology Continuity Discontinuity |
description |
The systematization of the studies of variationist sociolinguistics in three waves (ECKERT, 2012), or phases, organizes in a way the work that has been carried out in the area since the 1960s. Refining this systematization, this article aims to discuss the epistemological (and therefore theoretical-methodological) (in)adequacy of the approximation between the waves based on favorable and unfavorable arguments to the idea of continuity/ complementarity between the phases. This investigation has an interpretative nature, constitutes a bibliographic research and examines Eckert (2000; 2008; 2012; 2016a; 2016b; 2018), Labov (2001, 2010), Eckert and Rickford (2001), Coupland (2001; 2007, 2014); Camacho (2013; 2015) Bell (2001; 2014; 2016), Eckert and Labov (2017), Hernández-Campoy (2019; 2020), among other authors. The reflections point to the possibility of two different interpretations about the relatioship established between the different variationist phases: on the one hand, one interpretation is that there is an epistemological continuum between the three phases, so that its assumptions would be integrated in the third wave, leading to a robust theory of variation; on the other hand, another interpretation is that there is no epistemological continuum between the three phases, since the first phase would harmonize with procedures of a structural approach and the third phase would harmonize with procedures of an antropological-discursive approach, leading to a robust theory of variation by the aspects that are constitutive to its (and not by an integration of assumptions of the three phases). In view of the discussion carried out, we highlight that is relevant for the area to consider this controversial metatheoretical point. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070 10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2070 |
url |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25189/rabralin.v21i1.2070 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/2070/2672 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Marcela Langa Lacerda, Edair Maria Görski, Carla Regina Martins Paza https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Marcela Langa Lacerda, Edair Maria Görski, Carla Regina Martins Paza https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 1 (2022) Revista da ABRALIN; V. 21, N. 1 (2022) 0102-7158 10.25189/rabralin.v21i1 reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org |
_version_ |
1798329768214528000 |