The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam Schembri
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1667 |
Resumo: | Adam Schembri discussed the concept of morphological complexity in sign languages, as well as the paradoxes that result from the analysis of these languages in the light of the views of Aronoff, Meier and Sandler (2005) and Trudgill (2011). According to the speaker, the first authors do not define such a concept, but it can be inferred from their work that they associate it with the plurimorphic composition of the sign. In this perspective, the paradox of the morphology of sign languages emerges from the fact that these languages have a mixture of characteristics typical of polysynthetic and creole languages. Alternatively, Trudgill defines the morphological complexity based on the acquisition difficulties faced by adult foreign language learners: the irregularity, the unpredictability of allomorphs, the redundancy and the morphological marking of categories. In this perspective, the paradox of sign language morphology stems from the scarcity of these properties in these languages, even though they present morphologically complex constructions involving indicating verbs and classifiers. |
id |
UFPR-12_6ab5c8dd00bc14c4a56641c0e564044b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1667 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam SchembriO ‘paradoxo’ da morfologia das línguas de sinais por Adam SchembriComplexidade morfológicaTipologia sociolinguísticaLínguas de sinaisMorphological complexitySociolinguistic typologySigned languagesAdam Schembri discussed the concept of morphological complexity in sign languages, as well as the paradoxes that result from the analysis of these languages in the light of the views of Aronoff, Meier and Sandler (2005) and Trudgill (2011). According to the speaker, the first authors do not define such a concept, but it can be inferred from their work that they associate it with the plurimorphic composition of the sign. In this perspective, the paradox of the morphology of sign languages emerges from the fact that these languages have a mixture of characteristics typical of polysynthetic and creole languages. Alternatively, Trudgill defines the morphological complexity based on the acquisition difficulties faced by adult foreign language learners: the irregularity, the unpredictability of allomorphs, the redundancy and the morphological marking of categories. In this perspective, the paradox of sign language morphology stems from the scarcity of these properties in these languages, even though they present morphologically complex constructions involving indicating verbs and classifiers.Adam Schembri discutiu o conceito de complexidade morfológica nas línguas sinalizadas, bem como os paradoxos que resultam da análise dessas línguas à luz das visões de Aronoff, Meier e Sandler (2005) e de Trudgill (2011). Segundo o conferencista, os primeiros autores não definem tal conceito, mas pode-se depreender de seu trabalho que eles o associam à composição plurimorfêmica do sinal. Nessa perspectiva, o paradoxo da morfologia das línguas de sinais emerge do fato de essas línguas apresentarem uma mistura de características típicas de línguas polissintéticas e de línguas crioulas. Alternativamente, Trudgill define a complexidade morfológica com base nas dificuldades de aquisição enfrentadas por aprendizes adultos de línguas estrangeiras: a irregularidade, a imprevisibilidade dos alomorfes, a redundância e a marcação morfológica de categorias. Nessa perspectiva, o paradoxo da morfologia das línguas de sinais decorre da escassez dessas propriedades nessas línguas, ainda que apresentem construções morfologicamente complexas envolvendo verbos indicadores e classificadores.Associação Brasileira de Linguística2020-09-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAbralin ao Vivotextoapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/166710.25189/rabralin.v19i2.1667Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 2 (2020); 1-6Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 2 (2020); 1-60102-715810.25189/rabralin.v19i2reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1667/1731https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1667/1788Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Abralininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva-Júnior, Daltro Roque Carvalho da Xavier, André Nogueira2021-12-23T21:09:52Zoai:ojs.revista.ojs.abralin.org:article/1667Revistahttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralinPUBhttps://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/oairkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org2178-76031678-1805opendoar:2021-12-23T21:09:52Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam Schembri O ‘paradoxo’ da morfologia das línguas de sinais por Adam Schembri |
title |
The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam Schembri |
spellingShingle |
The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam Schembri Silva-Júnior, Daltro Roque Carvalho da Complexidade morfológica Tipologia sociolinguística Línguas de sinais Morphological complexity Sociolinguistic typology Signed languages |
title_short |
The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam Schembri |
title_full |
The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam Schembri |
title_fullStr |
The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam Schembri |
title_full_unstemmed |
The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam Schembri |
title_sort |
The ‘paradox’ of sign language morphology” by Adam Schembri |
author |
Silva-Júnior, Daltro Roque Carvalho da |
author_facet |
Silva-Júnior, Daltro Roque Carvalho da Xavier, André Nogueira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Xavier, André Nogueira |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva-Júnior, Daltro Roque Carvalho da Xavier, André Nogueira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Complexidade morfológica Tipologia sociolinguística Línguas de sinais Morphological complexity Sociolinguistic typology Signed languages |
topic |
Complexidade morfológica Tipologia sociolinguística Línguas de sinais Morphological complexity Sociolinguistic typology Signed languages |
description |
Adam Schembri discussed the concept of morphological complexity in sign languages, as well as the paradoxes that result from the analysis of these languages in the light of the views of Aronoff, Meier and Sandler (2005) and Trudgill (2011). According to the speaker, the first authors do not define such a concept, but it can be inferred from their work that they associate it with the plurimorphic composition of the sign. In this perspective, the paradox of the morphology of sign languages emerges from the fact that these languages have a mixture of characteristics typical of polysynthetic and creole languages. Alternatively, Trudgill defines the morphological complexity based on the acquisition difficulties faced by adult foreign language learners: the irregularity, the unpredictability of allomorphs, the redundancy and the morphological marking of categories. In this perspective, the paradox of sign language morphology stems from the scarcity of these properties in these languages, even though they present morphologically complex constructions involving indicating verbs and classifiers. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Abralin ao Vivo texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1667 10.25189/rabralin.v19i2.1667 |
url |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1667 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25189/rabralin.v19i2.1667 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1667/1731 https://revista.abralin.org/index.php/abralin/article/view/1667/1788 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Abralin info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Abralin |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 2 (2020); 1-6 Revista da ABRALIN; V. 19, N. 2 (2020); 1-6 0102-7158 10.25189/rabralin.v19i2 reponame:Revista da ABRALIN (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABRALIN (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rkofreitag@uol.com.br || ra@abralin.org |
_version_ |
1798329771261689856 |