Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romano, Andrea
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/e232
Resumo: The article employs comparative analysis to investigate the nexus between constitutional adjudication and electoral systems through the perspective of the principle of equality in elections. It delves into the different reasoning of the constitutional courts of Germany, Italy and Spain, trying to unpack the various interpretations attached to that principle under the case law of these courts. In particular, it explores the arguments revolving around the interpretation of equality as the “one person, one vote” rule and its potential wider meaning, comparing the approaches adopted in the case law of the three jurisdictions. On a theoretical level, this submission aims to provide insights on the functions and limits of constitutional review in electoral matters and, more generally, to contribute to studies of constitutional law concerned with the tension between legislative discretion and the role of constitutional courts.
id UFPR-14_2ac432263b0f4fac10689c1914a88a2e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/89827
network_acronym_str UFPR-14
network_name_str Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
repository_id_str
spelling Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral EqualityConstitutional Lawequality; electoral law; constitutional jurisdiction; comparative constitutionalismThe article employs comparative analysis to investigate the nexus between constitutional adjudication and electoral systems through the perspective of the principle of equality in elections. It delves into the different reasoning of the constitutional courts of Germany, Italy and Spain, trying to unpack the various interpretations attached to that principle under the case law of these courts. In particular, it explores the arguments revolving around the interpretation of equality as the “one person, one vote” rule and its potential wider meaning, comparing the approaches adopted in the case law of the three jurisdictions. On a theoretical level, this submission aims to provide insights on the functions and limits of constitutional review in electoral matters and, more generally, to contribute to studies of constitutional law concerned with the tension between legislative discretion and the role of constitutional courts.NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPRRomano, Andrea2023-10-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/e23210.5380/rinc.v10i2.89827Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 10, n. 2 (2023): maio/agosto; e232Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 10, n. 2 (2023): maio/agosto; e232Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 10, n. 2 (2023): maio/agosto; e2322359-563910.5380/rinc.v10i2reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionaisinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/e232/51340Direitos autorais 2023 Andrea Romanohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-04T20:38:43Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/89827Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rincPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/oairevista@ninc.com.br||2359-56392359-5639opendoar:2024-01-04T20:38:43Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
spellingShingle Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
Romano, Andrea
Constitutional Law
equality; electoral law; constitutional jurisdiction; comparative constitutionalism
title_short Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title_full Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title_fullStr Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
title_sort Constitutional Courts Dealing with Electoral Systems: a Comparative Look at Constitutional Adjudication on Electoral Equality
author Romano, Andrea
author_facet Romano, Andrea
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romano, Andrea
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Constitutional Law
equality; electoral law; constitutional jurisdiction; comparative constitutionalism
topic Constitutional Law
equality; electoral law; constitutional jurisdiction; comparative constitutionalism
description The article employs comparative analysis to investigate the nexus between constitutional adjudication and electoral systems through the perspective of the principle of equality in elections. It delves into the different reasoning of the constitutional courts of Germany, Italy and Spain, trying to unpack the various interpretations attached to that principle under the case law of these courts. In particular, it explores the arguments revolving around the interpretation of equality as the “one person, one vote” rule and its potential wider meaning, comparing the approaches adopted in the case law of the three jurisdictions. On a theoretical level, this submission aims to provide insights on the functions and limits of constitutional review in electoral matters and, more generally, to contribute to studies of constitutional law concerned with the tension between legislative discretion and the role of constitutional courts.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-10-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv


dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/e232
10.5380/rinc.v10i2.89827
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/e232
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/rinc.v10i2.89827
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/e232/51340
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2023 Andrea Romano
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2023 Andrea Romano
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 10, n. 2 (2023): maio/agosto; e232
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 10, n. 2 (2023): maio/agosto; e232
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 10, n. 2 (2023): maio/agosto; e232
2359-5639
10.5380/rinc.v10i2
reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
collection Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@ninc.com.br||
_version_ 1797174657143537664