A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/58990 |
Resumo: | Recently, the United States Supreme Court passed a victory to the current President Donald J. Trump by revitalizing parts of a travel ban on individuals from six Muslim-majority countries that he alleged is needed for national security and the interests of the United States but that adversaries criticize and claim as biased and discriminatory. The justices lessened the scope of lower court decisions that had entirely blocked crucial parts of a March 6, 2017 executive order that Trump had said was required to avert terrorism attacks, permitting his temporary ban to go into effect for folks with no strong ties to the United States. In this domain, the court issued its order on the last day of its current term and agreed to hear oral arguments again at a later stage, so it can decide lastly whether the ban is legitimate in a foremost test of presidential powers and controls. |
id |
UFPR-14_50016a1b9a35e908b9aa6bb9b6636024 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/58990 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-14 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban?Law; Constitutional Lawtravel ban; muslims; human rights; discrimination; religionHuman rightsRecently, the United States Supreme Court passed a victory to the current President Donald J. Trump by revitalizing parts of a travel ban on individuals from six Muslim-majority countries that he alleged is needed for national security and the interests of the United States but that adversaries criticize and claim as biased and discriminatory. The justices lessened the scope of lower court decisions that had entirely blocked crucial parts of a March 6, 2017 executive order that Trump had said was required to avert terrorism attacks, permitting his temporary ban to go into effect for folks with no strong ties to the United States. In this domain, the court issued its order on the last day of its current term and agreed to hear oral arguments again at a later stage, so it can decide lastly whether the ban is legitimate in a foremost test of presidential powers and controls.NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPRArafa, Mohamed2018-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/5899010.5380/rinc.v5i2.58990Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 5, n. 2 (2018): maio/agosto; 9-34Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 5, n. 2 (2018): maio/agosto; 9-34Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 5, n. 2 (2018): maio/agosto; 9-342359-563910.5380/rinc.v5i2reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionaisinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/58990/35884http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-10-17T15:00:56Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/58990Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rincPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/oairevista@ninc.com.br||2359-56392359-5639opendoar:2018-10-17T15:00:56Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban? |
title |
A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban? |
spellingShingle |
A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban? Arafa, Mohamed Law; Constitutional Law travel ban; muslims; human rights; discrimination; religion Human rights |
title_short |
A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban? |
title_full |
A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban? |
title_fullStr |
A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban? |
title_full_unstemmed |
A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban? |
title_sort |
A question to the President of the United States, Donald Trump: is it a travel ban, or a Muslim ban, or a travel Muslim ban? |
author |
Arafa, Mohamed |
author_facet |
Arafa, Mohamed |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Arafa, Mohamed |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Law; Constitutional Law travel ban; muslims; human rights; discrimination; religion Human rights |
topic |
Law; Constitutional Law travel ban; muslims; human rights; discrimination; religion Human rights |
description |
Recently, the United States Supreme Court passed a victory to the current President Donald J. Trump by revitalizing parts of a travel ban on individuals from six Muslim-majority countries that he alleged is needed for national security and the interests of the United States but that adversaries criticize and claim as biased and discriminatory. The justices lessened the scope of lower court decisions that had entirely blocked crucial parts of a March 6, 2017 executive order that Trump had said was required to avert terrorism attacks, permitting his temporary ban to go into effect for folks with no strong ties to the United States. In this domain, the court issued its order on the last day of its current term and agreed to hear oral arguments again at a later stage, so it can decide lastly whether the ban is legitimate in a foremost test of presidential powers and controls. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-05-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/58990 10.5380/rinc.v5i2.58990 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/58990 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5380/rinc.v5i2.58990 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/rinc/article/view/58990/35884 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
NINC - Núcleo de Investigações Constitucionais da UFPR |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 5, n. 2 (2018): maio/agosto; 9-34 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 5, n. 2 (2018): maio/agosto; 9-34 Revista de Investigações Constitucionais; v. 5, n. 2 (2018): maio/agosto; 9-34 2359-5639 10.5380/rinc.v5i2 reponame:Revista de Investigações Constitucionais instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
collection |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Investigações Constitucionais - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@ninc.com.br|| |
_version_ |
1797174658117664769 |