USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABOR

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Klein, Bruna Euzebio
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Gouveia, Helga Geremias
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87101
Resumo: Objective: to analyze the practice of using non-pharmacological pain relief methodsduring labor.Method: a quantitative and descriptive cross-sectional study developed from December 2019 to September 2020 in a Maternal and Child Nursing Service from southern Brazil. A total of 560 medical charts were analyzed and data collection took place in the institutional database. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normality of the variables and, for associations, the t test for independent samples, chi-square or Fischer’s exact test.Results: It was found that 164 (29.3%) of the parturients resorted to at least one type of method, the most used being hydrotherapy with 137 (24.5%), change of position with 124 (22.1%) and breathing exercises with 121 (21.6%). There was a significant association (p<0.05) between methods, type of delivery, pregnancy and parity.Conclusion: This study highlights the profile of parturients who benefit from these practices and exposes the low frequency of their use, showing a promising area for studies and continuing education activities.
id UFPR-15_265a211f5f5209f763d4ad37b6eea1c4
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/87101
network_acronym_str UFPR-15
network_name_str Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABORObstetrics; Humanized Delivery; Labor Pain; Nursing; Women’s Health.Objective: to analyze the practice of using non-pharmacological pain relief methodsduring labor.Method: a quantitative and descriptive cross-sectional study developed from December 2019 to September 2020 in a Maternal and Child Nursing Service from southern Brazil. A total of 560 medical charts were analyzed and data collection took place in the institutional database. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normality of the variables and, for associations, the t test for independent samples, chi-square or Fischer’s exact test.Results: It was found that 164 (29.3%) of the parturients resorted to at least one type of method, the most used being hydrotherapy with 137 (24.5%), change of position with 124 (22.1%) and breathing exercises with 121 (21.6%). There was a significant association (p<0.05) between methods, type of delivery, pregnancy and parity.Conclusion: This study highlights the profile of parturients who benefit from these practices and exposes the low frequency of their use, showing a promising area for studies and continuing education activities.Universidade Federal do ParanáKlein, Bruna EuzebioGouveia, Helga Geremias2022-08-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/8710110.5380/ce.v27i0.87101Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)2176-91331414-853610.5380/ce.v27i0reponame:Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87101/pdfDireitos autorais 2022 Bruna Euzebio Klein, Helga Geremias Gouveiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-08-17T14:07:40Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/87101Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/oaicogitare@ufpr.br2176-91331414-8536opendoar:2022-08-17T14:07:40Cogitare Enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABOR
title USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABOR
spellingShingle USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABOR
Klein, Bruna Euzebio
Obstetrics; Humanized Delivery; Labor Pain; Nursing; Women’s Health.
title_short USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABOR
title_full USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABOR
title_fullStr USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABOR
title_full_unstemmed USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABOR
title_sort USE OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN RELIEF METHODS IN LABOR
author Klein, Bruna Euzebio
author_facet Klein, Bruna Euzebio
Gouveia, Helga Geremias
author_role author
author2 Gouveia, Helga Geremias
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Klein, Bruna Euzebio
Gouveia, Helga Geremias
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv


dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Obstetrics; Humanized Delivery; Labor Pain; Nursing; Women’s Health.
topic Obstetrics; Humanized Delivery; Labor Pain; Nursing; Women’s Health.
description Objective: to analyze the practice of using non-pharmacological pain relief methodsduring labor.Method: a quantitative and descriptive cross-sectional study developed from December 2019 to September 2020 in a Maternal and Child Nursing Service from southern Brazil. A total of 560 medical charts were analyzed and data collection took place in the institutional database. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normality of the variables and, for associations, the t test for independent samples, chi-square or Fischer’s exact test.Results: It was found that 164 (29.3%) of the parturients resorted to at least one type of method, the most used being hydrotherapy with 137 (24.5%), change of position with 124 (22.1%) and breathing exercises with 121 (21.6%). There was a significant association (p<0.05) between methods, type of delivery, pregnancy and parity.Conclusion: This study highlights the profile of parturients who benefit from these practices and exposes the low frequency of their use, showing a promising area for studies and continuing education activities.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv



dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87101
10.5380/ce.v27i0.87101
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87101
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/ce.v27i0.87101
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87101/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2022 Bruna Euzebio Klein, Helga Geremias Gouveia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2022 Bruna Euzebio Klein, Helga Geremias Gouveia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)
Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)
Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)
2176-9133
1414-8536
10.5380/ce.v27i0
reponame:Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
collection Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cogitare Enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cogitare@ufpr.br
_version_ 1797068304738680832

Registros relacionados