DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Giselle Lima de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: França, Giovanna Eliza Moreira, Souza, Thaís Rodrigues de, Macário, Vanessa de Moura, Camargo, Aline Figueiredo, Protti-Zanatta, Simone, Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87364
Resumo: Objective: to compare the performance of diagnostic exams and monitoring of tuberculosis between the general population and those in situations of social vulnerability from the municipality of Belo Horizonte/MG.Method: an epidemiological study of the tuberculosis cases recorded between 2001 and 2017 in the Information System of Belo Horizonte - Brazil. A descriptive analysis and a comparison were performed between the general population and those in street situations and deprived of their freedom.Results: diagnostic and follow-up tests were performed more frequently in vulnerable populations, in up to 30%, with low use of the rapid molecular test (mean of 35.4%) and of the observed treatment, with 22% of performance in the street population. and 38% in individuals deprived of freedom.Conclusion: the study points to the need to prioritize the rapid test and the observed treatment, especially among vulnerable groups. Disseminating the use of these tools can determine interruption of the transmission chain, the possibility of a cure and non-occurrence resistance.
id UFPR-15_c03eb949c08a93bb62290b371548a4f6
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/87364
network_acronym_str UFPR-15
network_name_str Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIESDIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIESTuberculosis; Social Vulnerability; Social Determinants of Health; Street People; Inmates.Objective: to compare the performance of diagnostic exams and monitoring of tuberculosis between the general population and those in situations of social vulnerability from the municipality of Belo Horizonte/MG.Method: an epidemiological study of the tuberculosis cases recorded between 2001 and 2017 in the Information System of Belo Horizonte - Brazil. A descriptive analysis and a comparison were performed between the general population and those in street situations and deprived of their freedom.Results: diagnostic and follow-up tests were performed more frequently in vulnerable populations, in up to 30%, with low use of the rapid molecular test (mean of 35.4%) and of the observed treatment, with 22% of performance in the street population. and 38% in individuals deprived of freedom.Conclusion: the study points to the need to prioritize the rapid test and the observed treatment, especially among vulnerable groups. Disseminating the use of these tools can determine interruption of the transmission chain, the possibility of a cure and non-occurrence resistance.Universidade Federal do ParanáFreitas, Giselle Lima deFrança, Giovanna Eliza MoreiraSouza, Thaís Rodrigues deMacário, Vanessa de MouraCamargo, Aline FigueiredoProtti-Zanatta, SimoneArcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre2022-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/8736410.5380/ce.v27i0.87364Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)2176-91331414-853610.5380/ce.v27i0reponame:Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87364/pdfDireitos autorais 2022 Giselle Lima de Freitas, Giovanna Eliza Moreira França, Thaís Rodrigues de Souza, Vanessa de Mora Macário, Aline Figueiredo Camargo, Simone Protti-Zanatta, Ricardo Alexandre Arcênciohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-09-26T15:41:38Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/87364Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/oaicogitare@ufpr.br2176-91331414-8536opendoar:2022-09-26T15:41:38Cogitare Enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES
DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES
title DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES
spellingShingle DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES
Freitas, Giselle Lima de
Tuberculosis; Social Vulnerability; Social Determinants of Health; Street People; Inmates.
title_short DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES
title_full DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES
title_fullStr DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES
title_full_unstemmed DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES
title_sort DIAGNOSIS AND MONITORING OF TUBERCULOSIS – DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GENERAL POPULATION AND THOSE WITH VULNERABILITIES
author Freitas, Giselle Lima de
author_facet Freitas, Giselle Lima de
França, Giovanna Eliza Moreira
Souza, Thaís Rodrigues de
Macário, Vanessa de Moura
Camargo, Aline Figueiredo
Protti-Zanatta, Simone
Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre
author_role author
author2 França, Giovanna Eliza Moreira
Souza, Thaís Rodrigues de
Macário, Vanessa de Moura
Camargo, Aline Figueiredo
Protti-Zanatta, Simone
Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas, Giselle Lima de
França, Giovanna Eliza Moreira
Souza, Thaís Rodrigues de
Macário, Vanessa de Moura
Camargo, Aline Figueiredo
Protti-Zanatta, Simone
Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv


dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tuberculosis; Social Vulnerability; Social Determinants of Health; Street People; Inmates.
topic Tuberculosis; Social Vulnerability; Social Determinants of Health; Street People; Inmates.
description Objective: to compare the performance of diagnostic exams and monitoring of tuberculosis between the general population and those in situations of social vulnerability from the municipality of Belo Horizonte/MG.Method: an epidemiological study of the tuberculosis cases recorded between 2001 and 2017 in the Information System of Belo Horizonte - Brazil. A descriptive analysis and a comparison were performed between the general population and those in street situations and deprived of their freedom.Results: diagnostic and follow-up tests were performed more frequently in vulnerable populations, in up to 30%, with low use of the rapid molecular test (mean of 35.4%) and of the observed treatment, with 22% of performance in the street population. and 38% in individuals deprived of freedom.Conclusion: the study points to the need to prioritize the rapid test and the observed treatment, especially among vulnerable groups. Disseminating the use of these tools can determine interruption of the transmission chain, the possibility of a cure and non-occurrence resistance.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-26
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv



dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87364
10.5380/ce.v27i0.87364
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87364
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/ce.v27i0.87364
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/87364/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)
Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)
Cogitare Enfermagem; v. 27 (2022)
2176-9133
1414-8536
10.5380/ce.v27i0
reponame:Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
collection Cogitare Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cogitare Enfermagem (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cogitare@ufpr.br
_version_ 1797068305247240192