On the sublime feeling

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Richir, Marc
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Suárez-Astaiza, Jeison Andrés
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
Texto Completo: https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220
Resumo: What does the feeling of the sublime consist of? What is its nature, its status? What kind of relationships do you weave with the imagination and intellectual intuition of the “element of the intelligible”? How are affectivity and Gemüt present there? How to understand its relationship with the affections, the affective, the feeling and the feelings? The answers to these questions are undertaken by Richir in this short text in which he comments and analyzes in detail some of the most notable paragraphs of Kant’s Critique of Judgement; Richir masterfully stops at the “General Observation on the Exposition of Reflective Aesthetic Judgments,” with which Kant closes the “Analytics of the Sublime,” to conclude with three observations that not only constitute a general vision of the text but also the general outlines of his own proposal: i) affections as sensations, temporalized in the present and situated in relation to space, and the Leib are always received by the Gemüt, not as a physical “sign”, but as something already incorporeal and capable of constituting, in intentional acts, the phenomenological hylé (otherwise immaterial); ii) affections are, in the Gemüt, that in which it experiences its movements, in itself foreign to the present and space, and which unfold without trajectory in an “element” that is not the element of the intelligible, although not foreign to him; iii) finally, the Gemüt, which has a relationship with affectivity, with the soul and even with the spirit, is something like the root, “the source of everything”, one of whose dimensions is affectivity, primordial or archaic, the heart (thymos) or the intimacy that can resonate with the “element of the intelligible” because it is radically external (although of a non-spatial exteriority), and this through the mediation of schematism and its interruption. These three positions will bring Richir very close to the Kantian definition of the Gemüt: the mood is by itself; It is all life, the very beginning of life
id UFPR-17_2bea63d1c9ac4c707c0d4a617a8a6f96
oai_identifier_str oai:phenomenology.com.br:article/220
network_acronym_str UFPR-17
network_name_str Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling On the sublime feelingSobre el sentimento de lo sublime Sobre o sentimento do sublimeSublimeAfetividadeGemütAfectoImaginaçãoKantSublimeAfectivityGemütAfectoImaginationKantSublimeAfectividadeGemütAfectoImaginacionKantWhat does the feeling of the sublime consist of? What is its nature, its status? What kind of relationships do you weave with the imagination and intellectual intuition of the “element of the intelligible”? How are affectivity and Gemüt present there? How to understand its relationship with the affections, the affective, the feeling and the feelings? The answers to these questions are undertaken by Richir in this short text in which he comments and analyzes in detail some of the most notable paragraphs of Kant’s Critique of Judgement; Richir masterfully stops at the “General Observation on the Exposition of Reflective Aesthetic Judgments,” with which Kant closes the “Analytics of the Sublime,” to conclude with three observations that not only constitute a general vision of the text but also the general outlines of his own proposal: i) affections as sensations, temporalized in the present and situated in relation to space, and the Leib are always received by the Gemüt, not as a physical “sign”, but as something already incorporeal and capable of constituting, in intentional acts, the phenomenological hylé (otherwise immaterial); ii) affections are, in the Gemüt, that in which it experiences its movements, in itself foreign to the present and space, and which unfold without trajectory in an “element” that is not the element of the intelligible, although not foreign to him; iii) finally, the Gemüt, which has a relationship with affectivity, with the soul and even with the spirit, is something like the root, “the source of everything”, one of whose dimensions is affectivity, primordial or archaic, the heart (thymos) or the intimacy that can resonate with the “element of the intelligible” because it is radically external (although of a non-spatial exteriority), and this through the mediation of schematism and its interruption. These three positions will bring Richir very close to the Kantian definition of the Gemüt: the mood is by itself; It is all life, the very beginning of life¿En qué consiste el sentimiento de lo sublime? ¿Cual es su naturaleza, su estatuto? ¿Qué tipo de relaciones teje con la imaginación y la intuición intelectual del “elemento de lo inteligible”? ¿Cómo están presentes allí afectividad y Gemüt? ¿Cómo entender su relación con los afectos, lo afectivo, el sentir y el sentimiento? Las respuestas a estas cuestiones son emprendidas por Richir en este corto texto en el que comenta y analiza detalladamente algunos de los parágrafos más notables de la Crítica del discernimiento de Kant; se detiene magistralmente en la “Observación general sobre la exposición de los juicios estéticos reflexionantes”, con la que Kant cierra la “Analítica de lo sublime”, para concluir con tres observaciones que no sólo constituyen una visión general del texto sino, también, los trazos generales de su propia propuesta: i) los afectos como sensaciones, temporalizados en presente y situados en relación al espacio y al Leib, son siempre acogidos por el Gemüt, no como una “señal” física, sino como algo ya incorpóreo y capaz de constituir, en los actos intencionales, la hylé fenomenológica (por lo demás inmaterial); ii) las afecciones son, en el Gemüt, aquello en lo que éste experimenta sus movimientos, de suyo ajenos al presente y al espacio, y que se despliegan sin trayectoria en un “elemento” que no es el elemento de lo inteligible, aunque no es ajeno a él. iii) finalmente, el Gemüt, que tiene relación con la afectividad, con el alma e incluso con el espíritu, es algo así como la raíz, “la fuente de todo”, una de cuyas dimensiones es la afectividad, primordial o arcaica, el corazón (thymos) o la intimidad que puede resonar con el elemento de lo inteligible por ser lo radicalmente externo (aunque de una exterioridad no espacial), y esto, por la mediación del esquematismo y de su interrupción. Estas tres posiciones llevarán a Richir muy cerca de la definición Kantiana del Gemüt: “el ánimo es por sí solo; es todo vida, el mismo principio de la vida”¿En qué consiste el sentimiento de lo sublime? ¿Cual es su naturaleza, su estatuto? ¿Qué tipo de relaciones teje con la imaginación y la intuición intelectual del “elemento de lo inteligible”? ¿Cómo están presentes allí afectividad y Gemüt? ¿Cómo entender su relación con los afectos, lo afectivo, el sentir y el sentimiento? Las respuestas a estas cuestiones son emprendidas por Richir en este corto texto en el que comenta y analiza detalladamente algunos de los parágrafos más notables de la Crítica del discernimiento de Kant; se detiene magistralmente en la “Observación general sobre la exposición de los juicios estéticos reflexionantes”, con la que Kant cierra la “Analítica de lo sublime”, para concluir con tres observaciones que no sólo constituyen una visión general del texto sino, también, los trazos generales de su propia propuesta: i) los afectos como sensaciones, temporalizados en presente y situados en relación al espacio y al Leib, son siempre acogidos por el Gemüt, no como una “señal” física, sino como algo ya incorpóreo y capaz de constituir, en los actos intencionales, la hylé fenomenológica (por lo demás inmaterial); ii) las afecciones son, en el Gemüt, aquello en lo que éste experimenta sus movimientos, de suyo ajenos al presente y al espacio, y que se despliegan sin trayectoria en un “elemento” que no es el elemento de lo inteligible, aunque no es ajeno a él. iii) finalmente, el Gemüt, que tiene relación con la afectividad, con el alma e incluso con el espíritu, es algo así como la raíz, “la fuente de todo”, una de cuyas dimensiones es la afectividad, primordial o arcaica, el corazón (thymos) o la intimidad que puede resonar con el elemento de lo inteligible por ser lo radicalmente externo (aunque de una exterioridad no espacial), y esto, por la mediación del esquematismo y de su interrupción. Estas tres posiciones llevarán a Richir muy cerca de la definición Kantiana del Gemüt: “el ánimo es por sí solo; es todo vida, el mismo principio de la vida”Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno)2024-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Journal Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2024): Revista Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; v. 5 n. 1 (2024): Revista Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-662675-467310.62506/phs.v5i1reponame:Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciencesinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRspahttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220/147Copyright (c) 2024 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRichir, MarcSuárez-Astaiza, Jeison Andrés2024-04-16T16:27:38Zoai:phenomenology.com.br:article/220Revistahttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phePUBhttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/index/oaicontato@phenomenology.com.br || aholanda@yahoo.com2675-46732675-4673opendoar:2024-04-16T16:27:38Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On the sublime feeling
Sobre el sentimento de lo sublime
Sobre o sentimento do sublime
title On the sublime feeling
spellingShingle On the sublime feeling
Richir, Marc
Sublime
Afetividade
Gemüt
Afecto
Imaginação
Kant
Sublime
Afectivity
Gemüt
Afecto
Imagination
Kant
Sublime
Afectividade
Gemüt
Afecto
Imaginacion
Kant
title_short On the sublime feeling
title_full On the sublime feeling
title_fullStr On the sublime feeling
title_full_unstemmed On the sublime feeling
title_sort On the sublime feeling
author Richir, Marc
author_facet Richir, Marc
Suárez-Astaiza, Jeison Andrés
author_role author
author2 Suárez-Astaiza, Jeison Andrés
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Richir, Marc
Suárez-Astaiza, Jeison Andrés
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sublime
Afetividade
Gemüt
Afecto
Imaginação
Kant
Sublime
Afectivity
Gemüt
Afecto
Imagination
Kant
Sublime
Afectividade
Gemüt
Afecto
Imaginacion
Kant
topic Sublime
Afetividade
Gemüt
Afecto
Imaginação
Kant
Sublime
Afectivity
Gemüt
Afecto
Imagination
Kant
Sublime
Afectividade
Gemüt
Afecto
Imaginacion
Kant
description What does the feeling of the sublime consist of? What is its nature, its status? What kind of relationships do you weave with the imagination and intellectual intuition of the “element of the intelligible”? How are affectivity and Gemüt present there? How to understand its relationship with the affections, the affective, the feeling and the feelings? The answers to these questions are undertaken by Richir in this short text in which he comments and analyzes in detail some of the most notable paragraphs of Kant’s Critique of Judgement; Richir masterfully stops at the “General Observation on the Exposition of Reflective Aesthetic Judgments,” with which Kant closes the “Analytics of the Sublime,” to conclude with three observations that not only constitute a general vision of the text but also the general outlines of his own proposal: i) affections as sensations, temporalized in the present and situated in relation to space, and the Leib are always received by the Gemüt, not as a physical “sign”, but as something already incorporeal and capable of constituting, in intentional acts, the phenomenological hylé (otherwise immaterial); ii) affections are, in the Gemüt, that in which it experiences its movements, in itself foreign to the present and space, and which unfold without trajectory in an “element” that is not the element of the intelligible, although not foreign to him; iii) finally, the Gemüt, which has a relationship with affectivity, with the soul and even with the spirit, is something like the root, “the source of everything”, one of whose dimensions is affectivity, primordial or archaic, the heart (thymos) or the intimacy that can resonate with the “element of the intelligible” because it is radically external (although of a non-spatial exteriority), and this through the mediation of schematism and its interruption. These three positions will bring Richir very close to the Kantian definition of the Gemüt: the mood is by itself; It is all life, the very beginning of life
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220
url https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220/147
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Journal Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2024): Revista Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; v. 5 n. 1 (2024): Revista Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66
2675-4673
10.62506/phs.v5i1
reponame:Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
collection Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@phenomenology.com.br || aholanda@yahoo.com
_version_ 1796798428028600320