On the sublime feeling
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220 |
Resumo: | What does the feeling of the sublime consist of? What is its nature, its status? What kind of relationships do you weave with the imagination and intellectual intuition of the “element of the intelligible”? How are affectivity and Gemüt present there? How to understand its relationship with the affections, the affective, the feeling and the feelings? The answers to these questions are undertaken by Richir in this short text in which he comments and analyzes in detail some of the most notable paragraphs of Kant’s Critique of Judgement; Richir masterfully stops at the “General Observation on the Exposition of Reflective Aesthetic Judgments,” with which Kant closes the “Analytics of the Sublime,” to conclude with three observations that not only constitute a general vision of the text but also the general outlines of his own proposal: i) affections as sensations, temporalized in the present and situated in relation to space, and the Leib are always received by the Gemüt, not as a physical “sign”, but as something already incorporeal and capable of constituting, in intentional acts, the phenomenological hylé (otherwise immaterial); ii) affections are, in the Gemüt, that in which it experiences its movements, in itself foreign to the present and space, and which unfold without trajectory in an “element” that is not the element of the intelligible, although not foreign to him; iii) finally, the Gemüt, which has a relationship with affectivity, with the soul and even with the spirit, is something like the root, “the source of everything”, one of whose dimensions is affectivity, primordial or archaic, the heart (thymos) or the intimacy that can resonate with the “element of the intelligible” because it is radically external (although of a non-spatial exteriority), and this through the mediation of schematism and its interruption. These three positions will bring Richir very close to the Kantian definition of the Gemüt: the mood is by itself; It is all life, the very beginning of life |
id |
UFPR-17_2bea63d1c9ac4c707c0d4a617a8a6f96 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:phenomenology.com.br:article/220 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-17 |
network_name_str |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
On the sublime feelingSobre el sentimento de lo sublime Sobre o sentimento do sublimeSublimeAfetividadeGemütAfectoImaginaçãoKantSublimeAfectivityGemütAfectoImaginationKantSublimeAfectividadeGemütAfectoImaginacionKantWhat does the feeling of the sublime consist of? What is its nature, its status? What kind of relationships do you weave with the imagination and intellectual intuition of the “element of the intelligible”? How are affectivity and Gemüt present there? How to understand its relationship with the affections, the affective, the feeling and the feelings? The answers to these questions are undertaken by Richir in this short text in which he comments and analyzes in detail some of the most notable paragraphs of Kant’s Critique of Judgement; Richir masterfully stops at the “General Observation on the Exposition of Reflective Aesthetic Judgments,” with which Kant closes the “Analytics of the Sublime,” to conclude with three observations that not only constitute a general vision of the text but also the general outlines of his own proposal: i) affections as sensations, temporalized in the present and situated in relation to space, and the Leib are always received by the Gemüt, not as a physical “sign”, but as something already incorporeal and capable of constituting, in intentional acts, the phenomenological hylé (otherwise immaterial); ii) affections are, in the Gemüt, that in which it experiences its movements, in itself foreign to the present and space, and which unfold without trajectory in an “element” that is not the element of the intelligible, although not foreign to him; iii) finally, the Gemüt, which has a relationship with affectivity, with the soul and even with the spirit, is something like the root, “the source of everything”, one of whose dimensions is affectivity, primordial or archaic, the heart (thymos) or the intimacy that can resonate with the “element of the intelligible” because it is radically external (although of a non-spatial exteriority), and this through the mediation of schematism and its interruption. These three positions will bring Richir very close to the Kantian definition of the Gemüt: the mood is by itself; It is all life, the very beginning of life¿En qué consiste el sentimiento de lo sublime? ¿Cual es su naturaleza, su estatuto? ¿Qué tipo de relaciones teje con la imaginación y la intuición intelectual del “elemento de lo inteligible”? ¿Cómo están presentes allí afectividad y Gemüt? ¿Cómo entender su relación con los afectos, lo afectivo, el sentir y el sentimiento? Las respuestas a estas cuestiones son emprendidas por Richir en este corto texto en el que comenta y analiza detalladamente algunos de los parágrafos más notables de la Crítica del discernimiento de Kant; se detiene magistralmente en la “Observación general sobre la exposición de los juicios estéticos reflexionantes”, con la que Kant cierra la “Analítica de lo sublime”, para concluir con tres observaciones que no sólo constituyen una visión general del texto sino, también, los trazos generales de su propia propuesta: i) los afectos como sensaciones, temporalizados en presente y situados en relación al espacio y al Leib, son siempre acogidos por el Gemüt, no como una “señal” física, sino como algo ya incorpóreo y capaz de constituir, en los actos intencionales, la hylé fenomenológica (por lo demás inmaterial); ii) las afecciones son, en el Gemüt, aquello en lo que éste experimenta sus movimientos, de suyo ajenos al presente y al espacio, y que se despliegan sin trayectoria en un “elemento” que no es el elemento de lo inteligible, aunque no es ajeno a él. iii) finalmente, el Gemüt, que tiene relación con la afectividad, con el alma e incluso con el espíritu, es algo así como la raíz, “la fuente de todo”, una de cuyas dimensiones es la afectividad, primordial o arcaica, el corazón (thymos) o la intimidad que puede resonar con el elemento de lo inteligible por ser lo radicalmente externo (aunque de una exterioridad no espacial), y esto, por la mediación del esquematismo y de su interrupción. Estas tres posiciones llevarán a Richir muy cerca de la definición Kantiana del Gemüt: “el ánimo es por sí solo; es todo vida, el mismo principio de la vida”¿En qué consiste el sentimiento de lo sublime? ¿Cual es su naturaleza, su estatuto? ¿Qué tipo de relaciones teje con la imaginación y la intuición intelectual del “elemento de lo inteligible”? ¿Cómo están presentes allí afectividad y Gemüt? ¿Cómo entender su relación con los afectos, lo afectivo, el sentir y el sentimiento? Las respuestas a estas cuestiones son emprendidas por Richir en este corto texto en el que comenta y analiza detalladamente algunos de los parágrafos más notables de la Crítica del discernimiento de Kant; se detiene magistralmente en la “Observación general sobre la exposición de los juicios estéticos reflexionantes”, con la que Kant cierra la “Analítica de lo sublime”, para concluir con tres observaciones que no sólo constituyen una visión general del texto sino, también, los trazos generales de su propia propuesta: i) los afectos como sensaciones, temporalizados en presente y situados en relación al espacio y al Leib, son siempre acogidos por el Gemüt, no como una “señal” física, sino como algo ya incorpóreo y capaz de constituir, en los actos intencionales, la hylé fenomenológica (por lo demás inmaterial); ii) las afecciones son, en el Gemüt, aquello en lo que éste experimenta sus movimientos, de suyo ajenos al presente y al espacio, y que se despliegan sin trayectoria en un “elemento” que no es el elemento de lo inteligible, aunque no es ajeno a él. iii) finalmente, el Gemüt, que tiene relación con la afectividad, con el alma e incluso con el espíritu, es algo así como la raíz, “la fuente de todo”, una de cuyas dimensiones es la afectividad, primordial o arcaica, el corazón (thymos) o la intimidad que puede resonar con el elemento de lo inteligible por ser lo radicalmente externo (aunque de una exterioridad no espacial), y esto, por la mediación del esquematismo y de su interrupción. Estas tres posiciones llevarán a Richir muy cerca de la definición Kantiana del Gemüt: “el ánimo es por sí solo; es todo vida, el mismo principio de la vida”Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno)2024-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Journal Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2024): Revista Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; v. 5 n. 1 (2024): Revista Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-662675-467310.62506/phs.v5i1reponame:Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciencesinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRspahttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220/147Copyright (c) 2024 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRichir, MarcSuárez-Astaiza, Jeison Andrés2024-04-16T16:27:38Zoai:phenomenology.com.br:article/220Revistahttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phePUBhttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/index/oaicontato@phenomenology.com.br || aholanda@yahoo.com2675-46732675-4673opendoar:2024-04-16T16:27:38Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
On the sublime feeling Sobre el sentimento de lo sublime Sobre o sentimento do sublime |
title |
On the sublime feeling |
spellingShingle |
On the sublime feeling Richir, Marc Sublime Afetividade Gemüt Afecto Imaginação Kant Sublime Afectivity Gemüt Afecto Imagination Kant Sublime Afectividade Gemüt Afecto Imaginacion Kant |
title_short |
On the sublime feeling |
title_full |
On the sublime feeling |
title_fullStr |
On the sublime feeling |
title_full_unstemmed |
On the sublime feeling |
title_sort |
On the sublime feeling |
author |
Richir, Marc |
author_facet |
Richir, Marc Suárez-Astaiza, Jeison Andrés |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Suárez-Astaiza, Jeison Andrés |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Richir, Marc Suárez-Astaiza, Jeison Andrés |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sublime Afetividade Gemüt Afecto Imaginação Kant Sublime Afectivity Gemüt Afecto Imagination Kant Sublime Afectividade Gemüt Afecto Imaginacion Kant |
topic |
Sublime Afetividade Gemüt Afecto Imaginação Kant Sublime Afectivity Gemüt Afecto Imagination Kant Sublime Afectividade Gemüt Afecto Imaginacion Kant |
description |
What does the feeling of the sublime consist of? What is its nature, its status? What kind of relationships do you weave with the imagination and intellectual intuition of the “element of the intelligible”? How are affectivity and Gemüt present there? How to understand its relationship with the affections, the affective, the feeling and the feelings? The answers to these questions are undertaken by Richir in this short text in which he comments and analyzes in detail some of the most notable paragraphs of Kant’s Critique of Judgement; Richir masterfully stops at the “General Observation on the Exposition of Reflective Aesthetic Judgments,” with which Kant closes the “Analytics of the Sublime,” to conclude with three observations that not only constitute a general vision of the text but also the general outlines of his own proposal: i) affections as sensations, temporalized in the present and situated in relation to space, and the Leib are always received by the Gemüt, not as a physical “sign”, but as something already incorporeal and capable of constituting, in intentional acts, the phenomenological hylé (otherwise immaterial); ii) affections are, in the Gemüt, that in which it experiences its movements, in itself foreign to the present and space, and which unfold without trajectory in an “element” that is not the element of the intelligible, although not foreign to him; iii) finally, the Gemüt, which has a relationship with affectivity, with the soul and even with the spirit, is something like the root, “the source of everything”, one of whose dimensions is affectivity, primordial or archaic, the heart (thymos) or the intimacy that can resonate with the “element of the intelligible” because it is radically external (although of a non-spatial exteriority), and this through the mediation of schematism and its interruption. These three positions will bring Richir very close to the Kantian definition of the Gemüt: the mood is by itself; It is all life, the very beginning of life |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220 |
url |
https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/220/147 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Journal Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2024): Revista Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; v. 5 n. 1 (2024): Revista Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; 61-66 2675-4673 10.62506/phs.v5i1 reponame:Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
collection |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@phenomenology.com.br || aholanda@yahoo.com |
_version_ |
1796798428028600320 |