The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/28 |
Resumo: | The objective is to describe the main features of the sympathy phenomenon from Max Scheler’s phenomenology. The central problem is to show how sympathy shows itself as a privileged “place” for understanding the experiences of others, because it implies a psychic-affective identification with whom one sympathizes and accepts. However, compassion and co-rejoicing cannot be understood as the apprehension of psychic contents unrelated tothe reproduction of the feelings of the other, equating mistakenly sympathizing with emotional infection. Consequently, in the first place, some reasons and ways of transformations of anthropologies and historical consolidation of the modern ratio that led to such mistake are outlined. Then, after distinguishing the plural forms of sympathy, showing its law of internal reasoning, the discussion turned to the meaning of how sympathy is to suffer and to rejoice by spelling out its intentional structure. To know the other, however, is not only to unite affectionately with others, but the free decision, proper of a spiritual being, to take part in the opening of the personal being of others, to participate in their intentional acts. It follows, then, that sympathizing presupposes the supreme form of love. |
id |
UFPR-17_a02b01f101bd126048c5812ed8c82f51 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:phenomenology.com.br:article/28 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-17 |
network_name_str |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler. Las Formas de Simpatía y su Papel en la Comprensión de las Experiencias de Otros en Scheler.As Formas da Simpatia e o seu Papel na Compreensão das Vivências Alheias em Scheler.Sentimientossimpatíaamorconocimiento del otroFeelingssympathyloveknowledge of each otherSentimientossimpatíaamorconocimiento del otroThe objective is to describe the main features of the sympathy phenomenon from Max Scheler’s phenomenology. The central problem is to show how sympathy shows itself as a privileged “place” for understanding the experiences of others, because it implies a psychic-affective identification with whom one sympathizes and accepts. However, compassion and co-rejoicing cannot be understood as the apprehension of psychic contents unrelated tothe reproduction of the feelings of the other, equating mistakenly sympathizing with emotional infection. Consequently, in the first place, some reasons and ways of transformations of anthropologies and historical consolidation of the modern ratio that led to such mistake are outlined. Then, after distinguishing the plural forms of sympathy, showing its law of internal reasoning, the discussion turned to the meaning of how sympathy is to suffer and to rejoice by spelling out its intentional structure. To know the other, however, is not only to unite affectionately with others, but the free decision, proper of a spiritual being, to take part in the opening of the personal being of others, to participate in their intentional acts. It follows, then, that sympathizing presupposes the supreme form of love.El objetivo es describir las características principales del fenómeno de simpatía a partir de la fenomenología de Max Scheler. El problema central es demostrar cómo se muestra la simpatía como un “lugar” privilegiado para la comprensión de las experiencias de otras personas, porque implica una unificación psíquico-afectiva con la que uno simpatiza o da la bienvenida. Sin embargo, la compasión y el regocijo no pueden entenderse como la aprehensión de contenidos psíquicos no relacionados con la reproducción de los sentimientos del otro, equiparando erróneamente la simpatía con el contagio afectivo. Así, primero, se describen algunas razones y formas de transformación de las antropologías y la consolidación histórica de la relación moderna que condujo a tal error. Luego, después de distinguir las formas plurales de simpatía, mostrando su ley de fundamento interno, se discute en qué sentido la simpatía es sufrir y regocijarse al deletrear su estructura intencional. Sin embargo, conocer al otro no es solo unirse afectuosamente con los demás, sino la libre decisión, propia de un ser espiritual, de participar en la apertura del ser personal de los demás, de participar en sus actos intencionales. Se deduce finalmente, entonces, que simpatizar presupone la forma suprema de amor.El objetivo es describir las características principales del fenómeno de simpatía a partir de la fenomenología de Max Scheler. El problema central es demostrar cómo se muestra la simpatía como un “lugar” privilegiado para la comprensión de las experiencias de otras personas, porque implica una unificación psíquico-afectiva con la que uno simpatiza o da la bienvenida. Sin embargo, la compasión y el regocijo no pueden entenderse como la aprehensión de contenidos psíquicos no relacionados con la reproducción de los sentimientos del otro, equiparando erróneamente la simpatía con el contagio afectivo. Así, primero, se describen algunas razones y formas de transformación de las antropologías y la consolidación histórica de la relación moderna que condujo a tal error. Luego, después de distinguir las formas plurales de simpatía, mostrando su ley de fundamento interno, se discute en qué sentido la simpatía es sufrir y regocijarse al deletrear su estructura intencional. Sin embargo, conocer al otro no es solo unirse afectuosamente con los demás, sino la libre decisión, propia de un ser espiritual, de participar en la apertura del ser personal de los demás, de participar en sus actos intencionales. Se deduce finalmente, entonces, que simpatizar presupone la forma suprema de amor.Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno)2020-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/28Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Phenomenology, Humanities and Science; 260-270Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2020): Phenomenology, Humanities and Science; 260-270Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; v. 1 n. 2 (2020): Phenomenology, Humanities and Science; 260-2702675-467310.62506/phs.v1i2reponame:Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciencesinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/28/30Copyright (c) 2020 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamos, Daniel Rodrigues2024-04-15T18:26:23Zoai:phenomenology.com.br:article/28Revistahttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phePUBhttps://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/index/oaicontato@phenomenology.com.br || aholanda@yahoo.com2675-46732675-4673opendoar:2024-04-15T18:26:23Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler. Las Formas de Simpatía y su Papel en la Comprensión de las Experiencias de Otros en Scheler. As Formas da Simpatia e o seu Papel na Compreensão das Vivências Alheias em Scheler. |
title |
The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler. |
spellingShingle |
The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler. Ramos, Daniel Rodrigues Sentimientos simpatía amor conocimiento del otro Feelings sympathy love knowledge of each other Sentimientos simpatía amor conocimiento del otro |
title_short |
The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler. |
title_full |
The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler. |
title_fullStr |
The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler. |
title_sort |
The Forms Of Sympathy And Understanding Of Others’Experiences In Scheler. |
author |
Ramos, Daniel Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Ramos, Daniel Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramos, Daniel Rodrigues |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sentimientos simpatía amor conocimiento del otro Feelings sympathy love knowledge of each other Sentimientos simpatía amor conocimiento del otro |
topic |
Sentimientos simpatía amor conocimiento del otro Feelings sympathy love knowledge of each other Sentimientos simpatía amor conocimiento del otro |
description |
The objective is to describe the main features of the sympathy phenomenon from Max Scheler’s phenomenology. The central problem is to show how sympathy shows itself as a privileged “place” for understanding the experiences of others, because it implies a psychic-affective identification with whom one sympathizes and accepts. However, compassion and co-rejoicing cannot be understood as the apprehension of psychic contents unrelated tothe reproduction of the feelings of the other, equating mistakenly sympathizing with emotional infection. Consequently, in the first place, some reasons and ways of transformations of anthropologies and historical consolidation of the modern ratio that led to such mistake are outlined. Then, after distinguishing the plural forms of sympathy, showing its law of internal reasoning, the discussion turned to the meaning of how sympathy is to suffer and to rejoice by spelling out its intentional structure. To know the other, however, is not only to unite affectionately with others, but the free decision, proper of a spiritual being, to take part in the opening of the personal being of others, to participate in their intentional acts. It follows, then, that sympathizing presupposes the supreme form of love. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/28 |
url |
https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/28 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://phenomenology.com.br/index.php/phe/article/view/28/30 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação de Pesquisas em Fenomenologia (APFeno) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Phenomenology, Humanities and Science; 260-270 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2020): Phenomenology, Humanities and Science; 260-270 Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences; v. 1 n. 2 (2020): Phenomenology, Humanities and Science; 260-270 2675-4673 10.62506/phs.v1i2 reponame:Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
collection |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Phenomenology, Humanities and Sciences - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@phenomenology.com.br || aholanda@yahoo.com |
_version_ |
1796798427727659008 |