Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hölsgens, Rick
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Schubert, Cornelius
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Novation
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91143
Resumo: Users have no doubt become popular in innovation research. They are not considered a passive mass of adopters but as a more or less active agency in innovation processes. Diffusion research has, for instance, distinguished between several adopter categories: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. These categories can be mapped on the diffusion s-curve and indicate a temporal order along which innovations may be analysed. However, early or late adopters were still seen primarily as adopters. Concepts such as “reinvention” or “domestication” then put more emphasis on the ways in which an innovation may be changed within the adoption process. In these cases, innovations came from elsewhere (i.e., manufacturers), but the users were credited with more creative potential than simply adopting novelties. The turn towards user-driven innovations decidedly shifted the creative potential towards (specific) user groups, transgressing the traditional distinction between producers and consumers.The involvement of users in innovation processes has been addressed under different labels, for instance, user innovation, open innovation, or participatory design and from different fields such as management and innovation research, science and technology studies, or social innovation studies. The main gist of these approaches lies in reclaiming hitherto neglected aspects, perspectives, or sources of innovations, thus arguing against a top-down producer-centred models of innovation by emphasising bottom-up user-centred modes of innovation. They reconfigure ideas about pushes and pulls, about the constellations and locales in which invention and diffusion occur, and about the transformations of innovations as they emerge and evolve over time and space.This thematic issue of NOvation seeks to shed light on this increasing popularity of “the user” in innovation studies. We gather here contributions from diverse backgrounds that critically focus on the role of users in innovation studies, from empowerment and emancipation to valorisation and exploitation. We especially addressed the questions of why users have become popular both empirically and conceptually across a range of fields and spanning from academia to politics and civil society. How does user-centred innovation relate to more traditional models of producer-centred innovation? Which role do critical users play in innovation research? Are there specific fields in which users are seen to be more active than in others? Especially, who is considered to be a user or customer?
id UFPR-18_2770b8b92760f8f5a2df45ff964739a6
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/91143
network_acronym_str UFPR-18
network_name_str Novation
repository_id_str
spelling Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation processCritical Studies of Innovation; User-Driven Innovation; Popular Users; User TheoryUsers have no doubt become popular in innovation research. They are not considered a passive mass of adopters but as a more or less active agency in innovation processes. Diffusion research has, for instance, distinguished between several adopter categories: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. These categories can be mapped on the diffusion s-curve and indicate a temporal order along which innovations may be analysed. However, early or late adopters were still seen primarily as adopters. Concepts such as “reinvention” or “domestication” then put more emphasis on the ways in which an innovation may be changed within the adoption process. In these cases, innovations came from elsewhere (i.e., manufacturers), but the users were credited with more creative potential than simply adopting novelties. The turn towards user-driven innovations decidedly shifted the creative potential towards (specific) user groups, transgressing the traditional distinction between producers and consumers.The involvement of users in innovation processes has been addressed under different labels, for instance, user innovation, open innovation, or participatory design and from different fields such as management and innovation research, science and technology studies, or social innovation studies. The main gist of these approaches lies in reclaiming hitherto neglected aspects, perspectives, or sources of innovations, thus arguing against a top-down producer-centred models of innovation by emphasising bottom-up user-centred modes of innovation. They reconfigure ideas about pushes and pulls, about the constellations and locales in which invention and diffusion occur, and about the transformations of innovations as they emerge and evolve over time and space.This thematic issue of NOvation seeks to shed light on this increasing popularity of “the user” in innovation studies. We gather here contributions from diverse backgrounds that critically focus on the role of users in innovation studies, from empowerment and emancipation to valorisation and exploitation. We especially addressed the questions of why users have become popular both empirically and conceptually across a range of fields and spanning from academia to politics and civil society. How does user-centred innovation relate to more traditional models of producer-centred innovation? Which role do critical users play in innovation research? Are there specific fields in which users are seen to be more active than in others? Especially, who is considered to be a user or customer?Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil)Hölsgens, RickSchubert, Cornelius2021-05-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionInvited Commentaryapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/9114310.5380/nocsi.v0i3.91143NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 3 (2021): Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process; 1-5NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 3 (2021): Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process; 1-52562-714710.5380/nocsi.v0i3reponame:Novationinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91143/49252Copyright (c) 2023 Rick Hölsgens, Cornelius Schuberthttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-05T15:11:03Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/91143Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/oainovation@ufpr.br2562-71472562-7147opendoar:2023-12-05T15:11:03Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process
title Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process
spellingShingle Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process
Hölsgens, Rick
Critical Studies of Innovation; User-Driven Innovation; Popular Users; User Theory
title_short Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process
title_full Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process
title_fullStr Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process
title_full_unstemmed Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process
title_sort Thematic Issue Presentation. Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process
author Hölsgens, Rick
author_facet Hölsgens, Rick
Schubert, Cornelius
author_role author
author2 Schubert, Cornelius
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hölsgens, Rick
Schubert, Cornelius
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Critical Studies of Innovation; User-Driven Innovation; Popular Users; User Theory
topic Critical Studies of Innovation; User-Driven Innovation; Popular Users; User Theory
description Users have no doubt become popular in innovation research. They are not considered a passive mass of adopters but as a more or less active agency in innovation processes. Diffusion research has, for instance, distinguished between several adopter categories: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. These categories can be mapped on the diffusion s-curve and indicate a temporal order along which innovations may be analysed. However, early or late adopters were still seen primarily as adopters. Concepts such as “reinvention” or “domestication” then put more emphasis on the ways in which an innovation may be changed within the adoption process. In these cases, innovations came from elsewhere (i.e., manufacturers), but the users were credited with more creative potential than simply adopting novelties. The turn towards user-driven innovations decidedly shifted the creative potential towards (specific) user groups, transgressing the traditional distinction between producers and consumers.The involvement of users in innovation processes has been addressed under different labels, for instance, user innovation, open innovation, or participatory design and from different fields such as management and innovation research, science and technology studies, or social innovation studies. The main gist of these approaches lies in reclaiming hitherto neglected aspects, perspectives, or sources of innovations, thus arguing against a top-down producer-centred models of innovation by emphasising bottom-up user-centred modes of innovation. They reconfigure ideas about pushes and pulls, about the constellations and locales in which invention and diffusion occur, and about the transformations of innovations as they emerge and evolve over time and space.This thematic issue of NOvation seeks to shed light on this increasing popularity of “the user” in innovation studies. We gather here contributions from diverse backgrounds that critically focus on the role of users in innovation studies, from empowerment and emancipation to valorisation and exploitation. We especially addressed the questions of why users have become popular both empirically and conceptually across a range of fields and spanning from academia to politics and civil society. How does user-centred innovation relate to more traditional models of producer-centred innovation? Which role do critical users play in innovation research? Are there specific fields in which users are seen to be more active than in others? Especially, who is considered to be a user or customer?
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Invited Commentary
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91143
10.5380/nocsi.v0i3.91143
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91143
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/nocsi.v0i3.91143
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/91143/49252
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rick Hölsgens, Cornelius Schubert
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rick Hölsgens, Cornelius Schubert
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv


dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 3 (2021): Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process; 1-5
NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 3 (2021): Popular users: why and how innovation research started to consider users in the innovation process; 1-5
2562-7147
10.5380/nocsi.v0i3
reponame:Novation
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Novation
collection Novation
repository.name.fl_str_mv Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv novation@ufpr.br
_version_ 1787533920661667840